Jacksonville, FL

On November [XXX], 2025, a Beep-operated Ford E-Transit (€œ003C”) equipped with an automated driving system (ADS) develop by Oxa Autonomy Ltd. was involved in a collision with a third-party vehicle in Jacksonville, FL. While navigating eastbound on [XXX], vehicle 003C was struck on the driver-side rear quarter panel by a 2020 Toyota Prius performing an illegal U-turn from the opposing lane. No passengers were on board at the time of the incident. There were no injuries reported at the scene, and both vehicles were driven away from the site of the collision. Given construction in this area, vehicle 003C was under manual control while driving along [XXX]. The operator engaged the automated driving system as they exited the construction area, approximately one second prior to the collision. Vehicle data and dashcam video indicate the operator attempted to intervene but was unable to avoid contact by the other vehicle. The [XXX] responded to the scene. The driver of the other vehicle was cited for making an improper turn, and the responding officer noted that vehicle 003C was not at fault for the accident.

On August [XXX], 2025, a Beep-operated Ford E-Transit (002B) equipped with an automated driving system developed by Oxa Autonomy Ltd. was involved in a collision with a stationary object in Jacksonville, FL. While navigating westbound on [XXX] along a predefined route, vehicle 002B began to slowly veer towards the right curb. The vehicle eventually climbed the curb with the right front and rear wheels and the passenger-side mirror contacted a stationary light pole. There was one passenger onboard at the time of the incident, an employee of the Jacksonville Transportation Authority. There were no reported injuries, and the vehicle was driven from the scene. Review of the automated driving system logs as well as onboard video footage determined that the operator disengaged the automated driving system 7.5 seconds prior to the vehicle mounting the curb. Further examination of the onboard video footage noted that the operator appeared to be drowsy and inattentive prior to the incident. Beep confirmed that the operators shift was in compliance with anti-fatigue policies for this operation. The operator was referred for a post-accident drug and alcohol testing following the incident and tested negative for any impairment. Following the conclusion of the investigation into this incident, the operator was separated from employment.

On June [XXX], 2025, a Beep-operated Ford E-Transit (004D) equipped with an automated driving system developed by Oxa Autonomy Ltd. was involved in a collision with a third-party vehicle in Jacksonville, FL. While navigating northbound on [XXX], vehicle 004D approached the intersection of [XXX] under automated control. As vehicle 004D proceeded through the intersection, a 2020 Nissan Pathfinder navigating eastbound on [XXX] entered the intersection and struck vehicle 004D on the drivers door. Vehicle 004D had right of way through the intersection with no stop or yield the other vehicle had been stopped at a stop sign prior to the collision. There were no injuries reported at the scene, and both vehicles were driven away from the site of the collision. Prior to the collision, the safety operator in vehicle 004D stated that they noticed the other vehicle entering the intersection, applied the vehicles brakes, and steered away from the path of the other vehicle. Though they were able to bring vehicle 004D to a complete stop, they were unable to completely avoid the collision. Review of dashcam footage and of CCTV footage covering the intersection corroborate this narrative. The safety operator was referred for a post-accident drug and alcohol testing after the incident. They tested negative for any impairment. Analysis of the ADS logs determined that the ADS had detected the potential collision and had planned an emergency braking action. The safety operators intervention revoked control of the vehicle from the ADS preventing any automated braking actions. The [XXX] responded to the accident scene. The driver of the other vehicle was cited for failing to stop at the stop sign, and the JSO CSO noted that vehicle 004D was not at fault for the accident.