The MachineRecord
Side by side

iRobot vs Ecovacs

iRobot: 3 incidents on record recorded between 2016 and 2026, 1 where a person was hurt. Every case links to the sources it rests on.

Ecovacs: 3 incidents on record recorded between 2019 and 2024, none recording an injury. Every case links to the sources it rests on.

Counts are events documented in the press the register reads that cleared verification, not a safety rating: fleet sizes are not public, and a widely covered company accumulates more cases than a smaller one with the same incident. The escalation share is the one number that normalises itself. Formula on the methodology page.

Reading the numbers

iRobot and Ecovacs have the same number of cases on record, 3 each. iRobot's record begins earlier, in 2016, against 2019.

A person was hurt in 33% of iRobot's cases and 0% of Ecovacs's. Both have the same escalation share, 0%.

Both records are mostly about consumer robots. The more recent case belongs to iRobot, dated 2026-02-05.

iRobot

  • Cases on record3
  • A person was hurt1
  • Fatal0
  • Reached a regulator, recall or court0
  • Escalation share0%
  • First case on file2016
  • Latest case2026-02-05

Ecovacs

  • Cases on record3
  • A person was hurt0
  • Fatal0
  • Reached a regulator, recall or court0
  • Escalation share0%
  • First case on file2019
  • Latest case2024-05-24
Cases

Both records, newest first

Each case links to its timeline and to the sources it rests on.

Weekly digest

New cases, once a week, by email

Every case added to the register in the last seven days, with its sources. Free, no account, and the register is the only sender.

One email a week, Monday morning. Unsubscribe in one click.