The MachineRecord
NHTSA Standing General Order 2021-01

The SGO file, in a form you can search

NHTSA publishes the crash reports as three CSV files of 116 columns each, with several versions of the same report mixed in. This is the same data as one table: driverless systems (ADS) and Level 2 driver assistance side by side, 2021 to today including NHTSA's archive, one row per report at its latest version, every row traceable to its NHTSA report number. Free, CC BY 4.0, refreshed from NHTSA on every pipeline run.

Reports
8612
Fatal
87
Of them Level 2
79
Reporting entities
64
Incidents
2019-08 to 2026-09
Clear filters

1674 reports, showing 901 to 1000.

Report IDCaseProgramEntityIncidentPlaceVehicleEngagedCrash withSeveritySpeed, mphRoadwayNarrative
30270-7543ADSWaymo LLC2024-03 18:01San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries Reported2Street
On March [XXX], 2024, Waymo received notice of an allegation that a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California contributed to a collision involving two passenger cars near [XXX]. On March…On March [XXX], 2024, Waymo received notice of an allegation that a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California contributed to a collision involving two passenger cars near [XXX]. On March [XXX], 2024 at 6:01 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was traveling southeast on [XXX] when a passenger car began to exit from a driveway to the left of the Waymo AV. Simultaneously, a passenger car traveling northwest on [XXX] was approaching at a high rate of speed. The Waymo AV began to slow as the oncoming passenger car partially entered the same lane as the Waymo AV. The passenger car to the left of the Waymo AV continued exiting the driveway as the oncoming passenger car continued approaching. The passenger side of the oncoming passenger car then made contact with the driver side of the passenger car entering traffic. Neither passenger car made contact with the Waymo AV. The Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both passenger cars sustained damage. The oncoming passenger car left the scene without exchanging information. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30291-7361ADSNuro2024-03 20:20Mountain View, CA2022 Toyota PriusADSOther Fixed ObjectNo Injuries Reported10Street
On Tuesday, March [XXX], a Nuro Prius vehicle operating in manual was turning left from [XXX] onto [XXX] in Mountain View, California. The Prius vehicle bumped the medium and knocked over a white pylon. The vehicle had m…On Tuesday, March [XXX], a Nuro Prius vehicle operating in manual was turning left from [XXX] onto [XXX] in Mountain View, California. The Prius vehicle bumped the medium and knocked over a white pylon. The vehicle had minor damage and no injuries were reported. No other vehicles or VRUs were involved. Law enforcement was not involved. Nuro determined that the Prius was in autonomous mode within 30 seconds prior to the incident. There was no evidence that the autonomous operation had any impact on the incident.
30530-7475ADSAurora Operations, Inc.2024-03 13:52Barstow, TX2023 Peterbilt 579ADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported64Highway / Freeway
This incident occurred on March [XXX], 2024 at approximately 13:52 CT near Barstow, TX on [XXX]. The Aurora truck was operating in autonomy at the time. Weather and road conditions were clear. A white passenger car veere…This incident occurred on March [XXX], 2024 at approximately 13:52 CT near Barstow, TX on [XXX]. The Aurora truck was operating in autonomy at the time. Weather and road conditions were clear. A white passenger car veered into the lane of the Aurora truck and made contact with the left rear of the trailer. The Aurora Driver detected the collision and both the passenger car and the Aurora truck pulled over to the shoulder. Aurora notified law enforcement who arrived on the scene. We have no reports of injuries. The Aurora truck had damage to its rear left impact guard (ICC bar). The white passenger car had damage to its right side front quarter panel. Both vehicles departed the scene.
30531-7368ADSTransdev Alternative Services2024-03 1:03San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Street
On February [XXX], 2024 at 1:03 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped in traffic for…On February [XXX], 2024 at 1:03 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped in traffic for a red light on [XXX] southbound when a passenger car approached from behind and made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the driver's seating position). Both vehicles sustained damage and the passenger car left the scene. Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. This is a duplicate of Report ID 30270-7310-1.
30531-7545ADSTransdev Alternative Services2024-03 07:30Los Angeles, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported2Intersection
On March [XXX], 2024 at 7:30 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Los Angeles, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. While making a tight left turn from southbou…On March [XXX], 2024 at 7:30 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Los Angeles, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. While making a tight left turn from southbound [XXX] onto northeastbound [XXX], the Waymo AV made contact with the driver side of a parked passenger car. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the driver's seating position). Both vehicles sustained damage. Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General order 2021-01. Transdev may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This is a duplicate of report ID 30270-7534-1.
30531-7546ADSTransdev Alternative Services2024-03 15:12San Francisco, CA2024 Jaguar I-PaceADSPickup TruckNo Injuries Reported13Street
On March [XXX], 2024 at 3:12 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a pick-up truck near the 2300 block of [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling west…On March [XXX], 2024 at 3:12 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a pick-up truck near the 2300 block of [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling westbound on [XXX] towards [XXX] when it approached a pick-up truck which was oriented with its rear partially in the roadway on the north side of [XXX]. The pick-up truck was stationary but its reverse lights were illuminated. The Waymo AV came to a stop momentarily to yield to the pick-up truck, then began moving again to pass the pick-up truck, which had remained stopped. After the Waymo AV started moving, the pick-up truck began reversing further out of the driveway and the rear of the pick-up truck made contact with the right side of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode and a test driver was present (in the driver's seat). This is a duplicate of report ID 30270-7523-1.
30531-7548ADSTransdev Alternative Services2024-03 10:03Austin, TX2024 Jaguar I-PaceADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On March [XXX], 2024 at 10:03 AM CDT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Austin, Texas was in a collision involving a heavy truck on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling sout-eastbound on [XXX] i…On March [XXX], 2024 at 10:03 AM CDT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Austin, Texas was in a collision involving a heavy truck on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling sout-eastbound on [XXX] in autonomous mode when it came to a stop behind a heavy truck stopped at a stop sign at the intersection of [XXX]. The heavy truck then began reversing, and the Waymo AV test driver transitioned to manual mode. While the Waymo AV remained stopped, the heavy truk continued reversing and made contact with the front of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was not engaged and a test driver was operating the Waymo AV in manual mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. This is a duplicate of report ID 30270-7541-1.
30610-7464ADSZoox, Inc.2024-03 14:45Paradise, NV2017 Toyota HighlanderADSSUVNo Injuries Reported3Street
A Zoox vehicle (Vehicle 1) in autonomy was traveling east on [XXX] in stop and go traffic in the right travel lane, approaching the intersection with [XXX]. The Zoox vehicle slowed gradually for a stopped vehicle ahead i…A Zoox vehicle (Vehicle 1) in autonomy was traveling east on [XXX] in stop and go traffic in the right travel lane, approaching the intersection with [XXX]. The Zoox vehicle slowed gradually for a stopped vehicle ahead in the same travel lane, when it was rear ended by an SUV (Vehicle 2) that was traveling directly behind. The Zoox vehicle sustained moderate damage and it appears that the SUV may have sustained moderate damage as well. There were no reported injuries. The Police and EMS were then called to the scene, however, it was reported that only the EMS personnel arrived at the scene.
988-7550ADSPACCAR Incorporated2024-03 13:52Barstow, TX2023 Peterbilt 579ADSPassenger CarNo Injuries ReportedHighway / Freeway
This incident occurred on March [XXX], 2024 at approximately 13:52 CT near Barstow, TX on [XXX]. The Aurora truck was operating in autonomy at the time. Weather and road conditions were clear. A white passenger car veere…This incident occurred on March [XXX], 2024 at approximately 13:52 CT near Barstow, TX on [XXX]. The Aurora truck was operating in autonomy at the time. Weather and road conditions were clear. A white passenger car veered into the lane of the Aurora truck and made contact with the left rear of the trailer. The Aurora Driver detected the collision and both the passenger car and the Aurora truck pulled over to the shoulder. Aurora notified law enforcement who arrived on the scene. We have no reports of injuries. The Aurora truck had damage to its rear left impact guard (ICC bar). The white passenger car had damage to its right side front quarter panel. Both vehicles departed the scene.
1420-7244ADSVolkswagen Group of America, Inc.2024-02 11:20Austin, TX2023 Volkswagen ID.BuzzADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
The subject vehicle was stopped at the intersection of [XXX] and [XXX] with the ADS system engaged, waiting for the traffic light to turn green. The passenger car (Toyota Tacoma, equipped with front grille/brush guard) a…The subject vehicle was stopped at the intersection of [XXX] and [XXX] with the ADS system engaged, waiting for the traffic light to turn green. The passenger car (Toyota Tacoma, equipped with front grille/brush guard) approached from behind, honked the horn, and struck the stationary subject vehicle. The driver of the subject vehicle proceed through the intersection and pulled over into an empty parking lot to safely assess the incident. The passenger car is noted as remaining at the light for an additional cycle of the traffic light before driving off and not pulling over with the vehicle it just struck. The subject vehicle's 3 occupants reported feeling the impact but report no injuries, airbag deployments, or tow-aways. The subject vehicle's damage was to the right rear bumper, including the right rear sensor and mounting bracket.
30270-7164 v2ADSWaymo LLC2024-02 17:01Austin, TX2024 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
This report is being submitted to correct a clerical error in the Driver / Operator Type field that was originally reported on February 15, 2024 [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION]. Otherwise, the c…This report is being submitted to correct a clerical error in the Driver / Operator Type field that was originally reported on February 15, 2024 [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION]. Otherwise, the content of this report is unchanged. On February [XXX], 2024 at 3:01 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Austin, Texas was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle on a slip-lane between [XXX] and [XXX]. The Waymo AV was in the slip-lane connecting [XXX] and [XXX], preparing to merge onto northbound [XXX] with a passenger vehicle behind it. As the Waymo AV proceeded forward, actively yielding to approaching traffic, it stopped for additional approaching traffic. The passenger vehicle traveling behind the Waymo AV then made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-7190 v2ADSWaymo LLC2024-02 13:35San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSMotorcycleNo Injuries Reported1Intersection
The content of this report is unchanged from the initial report submitted on February 20, 2024 [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION] On February [XXX], 2024 at 1:35 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("…The content of this report is unchanged from the initial report submitted on February 20, 2024 [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION] On February [XXX], 2024 at 1:35 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a motorcyclist on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling northbound on [XXX] and was stopped at a red traffic light at [XXX], with a motorcyclist stopped behind the Waymo AV. When the light turned green, the Waymo AV proceeded into the intersection with the motorcyclist traveling close behind. In the intersection, the Waymo AV braked, and the motorcyclist then made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage, and the motorcyclist left the scene. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vulnerable road user was involved. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-7308ADSWaymo LLC2024-02 22:01Los Angeles, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSOther Fixed ObjectNo Injuries Reported8Street
On February [XXX], 2024 at 10:01 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Los Angeles, California was in a collision involving a gate at [XXX] and [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling south on [XXX] when i…On February [XXX], 2024 at 10:01 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Los Angeles, California was in a collision involving a gate at [XXX] and [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling south on [XXX] when it approached an automatic gate as it had started to close. The right side of the Waymo AV made contact with the door of the gate. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01.
30270-7309ADSWaymo LLC2024-02 20:55Tempe, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSSUVNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On February [XXX], 2024 at 8:55 PM MST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped at a red light on southbound [X…On February [XXX], 2024 at 8:55 PM MST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped at a red light on southbound [XXX] at [XXX] when an SUV approached from behind and made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage and the SUV left the scene. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01.
30270-7310ADSWaymo LLC2024-02 1:03San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Street
On February [XXX], 2024 at 1:03 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped in traffic for…On February [XXX], 2024 at 1:03 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped in traffic for a red light on [XXX] southbound when a passenger car approached from behind and made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the drivers seating position). Both vehicles sustained damage and the passenger car left the scene. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01.
30270-7311ADSWaymo LLC2024-02 18:41Phoenix, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSSUVNo Injuries Reported0Street
On February [XXX], 2024 at 6:41 PM MT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] and [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped at a traffic light on…On February [XXX], 2024 at 6:41 PM MT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] and [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped at a traffic light on eastbound [XXX] at the intersection with [XXX] and waiting for lead traffic to proceed when a passenger car approached from behind and made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage and the passenger car left the scene. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01.
30270-7312ADSWaymo LLC2024-02 1:42Phoenix, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries Reported26Street
On February [XXX], 2024 at 1:42 AM MT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving debris on [XXX] towards [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX] in t…On February [XXX], 2024 at 1:42 AM MT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving debris on [XXX] towards [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX] in the center lane when the vehicle made contact with a white object that was less than 12" in height and located in the middle of the AVs lane. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01.
30270-7313ADSWaymo LLC2024-02 9:30Phoenix, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported0Street
On February [XXX], 2024 at 9:30 AM MT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a heavy truck and trailer near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling east on [XXX] whe…On February [XXX], 2024 at 9:30 AM MT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a heavy truck and trailer near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling east on [XXX] when it came to a stop for a heavy truck that was preparing to back into a driveway on the north side of [XXX]. While the Waymo remained stationary, the heavy truck continued to reverse and the right side of the heavy trucks trailer made contact with the front of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01.
30270-7315ADSWaymo LLC2024-02 13:23San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported0Street
On February [XXX], 2024 at 1:23 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a heavy truck on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was departing a parking spa…On February [XXX], 2024 at 1:23 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a heavy truck on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was departing a parking space on the right side of [XXX] when a heavy truck came to a stop in the rightmost traffic lane in front of the Waymo AV. The Waymo AV came to a stop partially out of the parking space to yield to the stopped truck and await a gap in passing traffic in the center lane to merge and pass the stopped truck. While the Waymo was stopped, the truck reversed towards the parking space that the Waymo was still partially occupying and the rear left corner of the truck made contact with the right side of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01.
30270-7318 v3ADSWaymo LLC2024-02 16:58Phoenix, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Street
The content of this report is unchanged from the initial report submitted on March 15, 2024 [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION] A previous version of this 10-Day update incorrectly listed the initia…The content of this report is unchanged from the initial report submitted on March 15, 2024 [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION] A previous version of this 10-Day update incorrectly listed the initial report's submission date as February 20, 2024. On February [XXX], 2024 at 4:58 MT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] and [XXX]. The Waymo AV was turning right from eastbound [XXX] onto southbound [XXX] during a green light with the passenger car traveling close behind. The Waymo AV yielded for a pedestrian about to enter the crosswalk facing a "walk" signal, and the passenger car made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01.
30270-9169ADSWaymo LLC2024-02 16:36Tempe, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSOther Fixed ObjectNo Injuries Reported12Street
On February [XXX], 2024 at 4:36 PM MT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving a fence on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling east on [XXX] in the rightmos…On February [XXX], 2024 at 4:36 PM MT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving a fence on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling east on [XXX] in the rightmost lane when it approached a fence that was down partially on the rightmost lane and sidewalk from an abutting construction site. The front of the Waymo AV came in contact with the fence. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The fence sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30410-7276 v2ADSMotional2024-02 14:30Las Vegas, NV2024 Hyundai Ioniq 5ADSOther Fixed ObjectNo Injuries Reported15StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30413-7307ADSMay Mobility2024-02 11:40Ann Arbor, MI2022 Toyota SiennaADSSUVNo Injuries Reported29Street
The May vehicle was in autonomous mode on experimental test software (not deployed to the Commercial fleet), in light snow conditions. A vehicle behind the AV was traveling approximately the same speed as the May shuttl…The May vehicle was in autonomous mode on experimental test software (not deployed to the Commercial fleet), in light snow conditions. A vehicle behind the AV was traveling approximately the same speed as the May shuttle. The May AV began to slow for an object ahead. Due to weather conditions, the AV misclassified a speed limit sign as a pedestrian, which intersected with the predicted trajectory of the AV. This caused the May AV to apply additional braking to avoid the projected collision with the misclassified object. The following vehicle did not react promptly when the May AV started to slow down, resulting in the following vehicle braking too late to avoid collision and impacting the May AV from behind. The following vehicle then pulled around the May vehicle and drove away. Resimulation of this event with an upcoming software version shows that the May AV would not misidentify the non-exist object so would not have decelerated unnecessarily. This improved software is set to be deployed to the full commercial fleet soon. In addition, per May policy, the commercial fleet would not operate in weather conditions like those present in this incident.
30530-7141ADSAurora Operations, Inc.2024-02 14:03Streetman, TX2023 Peterbilt 579ADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported62Highway / Freeway
This incident occurred near Streetman, TX on [XXX] at approximately 3:03 PM CT on February [XXX], 2024. The Aurora vehicle was operating in autonomy at the time. Conditions were clear. As the Aurora vehicle was driving i…This incident occurred near Streetman, TX on [XXX] at approximately 3:03 PM CT on February [XXX], 2024. The Aurora vehicle was operating in autonomy at the time. Conditions were clear. As the Aurora vehicle was driving in its lane at 62 mph, a box truck veered into the lane of the Aurora vehicle. The box truck's mirror appeared to make contact with the back of the trailer that the Aurora Driver was pulling. At this time, we are not aware of any injuries, and camera footage appears to show that the box truck continued to drive. From the post-trip inspection, there was not any visible trailer damage. Before the collision, the Aurora Driver was driving straight in its lane and passing the box truck. Shortly thereafter, the box truck began to encroach into the lane of the Aurora Driver. The Aurora Driver detected the box truck's encroachment into the Aurora vehicle's lane and initiated a nudge away from the box truck to provide space. The Aurora Driver detected the collision and made the decision to initiate an incident response, but before it could execute that response, the Vehicle Operator took over control of the system and proceeded in manual. The Aurora vehicle then re-engaged in autonomy approximately two minutes later. The Vehicle Operator did not visually observe the collision, assumed the reaction of the Aurora Driver to be a software anomaly, and reported the vehicle nudge through our standard annotation protocol rather than through our incident response protocols. We identified the incident at approximately 1:03 PM CT on February [XXX], 2024 through a review of our data logs.
30531-7177ADSTransdev Alternative Services2024-02 17:01Austin, TX2024 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On February [XXX], 2024 at 3:01 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Austin, Texas was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle on a slip-lane between [XXX] and [XXX]. The Waymo AV was in a slip…On February [XXX], 2024 at 3:01 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Austin, Texas was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle on a slip-lane between [XXX] and [XXX]. The Waymo AV was in a slip-lane connecting [XXX] and [XXX], preparing to merge onto northbound [XXX] with a passenger vehicle behind it. As the Waymo AV proceeded forward, actively yielding to approaching traffic, it stopped for additional approaching traffic. The passenger vehicle traveling behind the Waymo AV the made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Transdev may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This is a duplicate of report ID 30270-7164-1.
30610-7292ADSZoox, Inc.2024-02 13:52San Francisco, CA2019 Toyota HighlanderADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
A Zoox vehicle (Vehicle 1) in autonomy was traveling southwest on [XXX] and turning right onto [XXX] on a green traffic signal. While executing the turn, the Zoox vehicle braked to achieve a minimal risk condition due to…A Zoox vehicle (Vehicle 1) in autonomy was traveling southwest on [XXX] and turning right onto [XXX] on a green traffic signal. While executing the turn, the Zoox vehicle braked to achieve a minimal risk condition due to an unexpected system fault, the safety operator disengaged, and then was rear ended by a passenger car (Vehicle 2) that was also turning directly behind the Zoox vehicle. The rear bumper cover and rear radar unit on the Zoox vehicle sustained damage. The hood, front grille and front bumper cover on the passenger car appeared to have sustained damage. There were no reported injuries and police were not called.
30610-7293ADSZoox, Inc.2024-02 11:00San Francisco, CA2019 Toyota HighlanderADSBusNo Injuries Reported1Street
A Zoox vehicle (Vehicle 1) in autonomy, traveling northeast on [XXX], was stopped in lane for a red traffic light at [XXX]. A SamTrans bus (Vehicle 2), with a front-mounted triple-bike rack extending past the width of th…A Zoox vehicle (Vehicle 1) in autonomy, traveling northeast on [XXX], was stopped in lane for a red traffic light at [XXX]. A SamTrans bus (Vehicle 2), with a front-mounted triple-bike rack extending past the width of the bus on the driver's side, was traveling southeast on [XXX] and attempting a right turn onto [XXX]. The protruding edge of the bike rack was encroaching into the Zoox vehicle's travel lane as the bus was executing the right hand turn. As the light turned green the Zoox vehicle inched forward and attempted to steer away from the bus. Just as the safety operator disengaged from autonomy, the protruding edge of the bike rack made contact with the driver's side fender on the Zoox vehicle. There were no reported injuries and the police were not called.
33175-9306ADSMobileye Vision Technologies2024-02 11:20Austin, TX2023 Volkswagen ID.BuzzADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On MAR-2024, Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. ("VW") filed an Incident Report (NHTSA-provided Report ID-1420-7244 - the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "SGO").…On MAR-2024, Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. ("VW") filed an Incident Report (NHTSA-provided Report ID-1420-7244 - the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "SGO"). The subject vehicle referred to in the Report contains the Reporter's software and hardware. Since the Reporter is also a Reporting Entity under the SGO, the Reporter hereby submits this report. In order to avoid duplications and additional CBI requests, this submission includes the publicly available information of the Report and incorporates the Report by reference. This submission is based on the information provided to the Reporter by VW. The Reporter currently believes that it has no independent knowledge of the information in this report. From Volkswagen: The subject vehicle was stopped at the intersection of [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION] and [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION] with the ADS system engaged, waiting for the traffic light to turn green. The passenger car (Toyota Tacoma, equipped with front grille/brush guard) approached from behind, honked the horn, and struck the stationary subject vehicle. The driver of the subject vehicle proceed through the intersection and pulled over into an empty parking lot to safely assess the incident. The passenger car is noted as remaining at the light for an additional cycle of the traffic light before driving off and not pulling over with the vehicle it just struck. The subject vehicle's 3 occupants reported feeling the impact but report no injuries, airbag deployments, or tow-aways. The subject vehicle's damage was to the right rear bumper, including the right rear sensor and mounting bracket.
669-7320ADSHyundai Motor America2024-02 14:30Las Vegas, NV2024 Hyundai IONIQ 5ADSOther Fixed ObjectNo Injuries Reported15StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
988-7317ADSPACCAR Incorporated2024-02 14:03Streetman, TX2023 Peterbilt 579ADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries ReportedHighway / Freeway
This incident occurred near Streetman, TX on [XXX] at approximately 3:03 PM CT on February [XXX], 2024. The Aurora vehicle was operating in autonomy at the time. Conditions were clear. As the Aurora vehicle was driving i…This incident occurred near Streetman, TX on [XXX] at approximately 3:03 PM CT on February [XXX], 2024. The Aurora vehicle was operating in autonomy at the time. Conditions were clear. As the Aurora vehicle was driving in its lane at 62 mph, a box truck veered into the lane of the Aurora vehicle. The box truck's mirror appeared to make contact with the back of the trailer that the Aurora Driver was pulling. At this time, we are not aware of any injuries, and camera footage appears to show that the box truck continued to drive. From the post-trip inspection, there was not any visible trailer damage. Before the collision, the Aurora Driver was driving straight in its lane and passing the box truck. Shortly thereafter, the box truck began to encroach into the lane of the Aurora Driver. The Aurora Driver detected the box truck's encroachment into the Aurora vehicle's lane and initiated a nudge away from the box truck to provide space. The Aurora Driver detected the collision and made the decision to initiate an incident response, but before it could execute that response, the Vehicle Operator took over control of the system and proceeded in manual. The Aurora vehicle then re-engaged in autonomy approximately two minutes later. The Vehicle Operator did not visually observe the collision, assumed the reaction of the Aurora Driver to be a software anomaly, and reported the vehicle nudge through the standard annotation protocol rather than through the incident response protocols. The incident was identified at approximately 1:03 PM CT on February 2, 2024, through a review of Aurora's data logs.
1420-7081ADSVolkswagen Group of America, Inc.2024-01 9:00Austin, TX2023 Volkswagen ID.BuzzADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
The subject vehicle was stopped at a traffic light at the corner of [XXX] and [XXX] (Austin,TX) while traveling westbound on [XXX] While ADS was engaged, the subject vehicle was stationary, the passenger car behind the …The subject vehicle was stopped at a traffic light at the corner of [XXX] and [XXX] (Austin,TX) while traveling westbound on [XXX] While ADS was engaged, the subject vehicle was stationary, the passenger car behind the subject vehicle proceeded forward from a stationary position and bumped into the rear bumper of the subject vehicle. The passenger vehicle reversed away from the subject vehicle. The operator of the subject vehicle then turned on the hazard lights, proceeded through the intersection once the light changed to green and turned right onto [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION] in order to check for a safe spot to park. The passenger vehicle, after reversing away from the subject vehicle, did not follow the subject vehicle and instead proceeded to turn right onto [XXX]. Once the operator pulled over they then followed protocol to call in the incident, took photos to document, and waited for manager and service to arrive at the scene to verify the damage. There were no known injuries, airbag deployments, or tow-away of anyone involved. There was no significant damage to the subject vehicle and it was driven back to the depot to debrief and provide information to incident response team on the incident.
30270-6981 v2ADSWaymo LLC2024-01 10:52San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PACEADSMotorcycleNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
This report includes the following updates to the initial report submitted on January 14, 2024 [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION]: corrected event year in the narrative from 2023 to 2024 LOCATION A…This report includes the following updates to the initial report submitted on January 14, 2024 [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION]: corrected event year in the narrative from 2023 to 2024 LOCATION ADDRESS / DESCRIPTION field updated to reflect the location listed in the narrative clarifications added to the narrative and correction to the Waymo AVs mileage. The remainder is unchanged from the initial report. On January [XXX], 2024 at 10:52AM PT a rider of a moped lost control of the moped they were operating and fell and slid in front of a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California on [XXX] at [XXX] neither the moped nor its driver made contact with the Waymo AV. The Waymo AV was stopped on northbound [XXX] at the intersection with [XXX] when it started to proceed forward while facing a red traffic light. As the Waymo AV entered the intersection, it detected a moped traveling on eastbound [XXX] and braked. As the Waymo AV braked to a stop, the rider of the moped braked then fell on the wet roadway before sliding to a stop in front of the stationary Waymo AV. There was no contact between the moped or its rider and the Waymo AV. The Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a passenger of the Waymo AV reported that the moped may have been damaged. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-7034ADSWaymo LLC2024-01 3:07Chandler, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSSUVNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On January [XXX], 2024 at 2:07 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Chandler, Arizona was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped for a red light on southbound [XXX…On January [XXX], 2024 at 2:07 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Chandler, Arizona was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped for a red light on southbound [XXX] when an SUV approached from behind and made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the drivers seating position). Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-7048ADSWaymo LLC2024-01 12:35Gilbert, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries Reported2Parking Lot
On January [XXX], 2024 at 12:35 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Gilbert, Arizona was in an event involving parking lot spikes at a parking lot entrance on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV had appro…On January [XXX], 2024 at 12:35 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Gilbert, Arizona was in an event involving parking lot spikes at a parking lot entrance on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV had approached an apartment complex parking lot entrance on [XXX] near [XXX], and encountered a closed gate, preventing access to the parking lot. Next to the closed entrance gate lane was an open exit lane, with parking lot spikes preventing wrong-way access. As the Waymo AV attempted a multi-point turn to exit the parking lot driveway and proceed on [XXX], the front passenger side tire drove over the parking lot spikes and deflated. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-7054ADSWaymo LLC2024-01 17:50Phoenix, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries Reported35Street
On January [XXX], 2024 at 4:50 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in an event involving a rock in the road on [XXX] past [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling northbound on [XXX] in…On January [XXX], 2024 at 4:50 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in an event involving a rock in the road on [XXX] past [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling northbound on [XXX] in the far right lane when its front passenger side tire made contact with a rock in the road and immediately deflated. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-7058ADSWaymo LLC2024-01 09:03Scottsdale, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries Reported10Parking Lot
On January [XXX], 2024 at 8:03 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Scottsdale, Arizona was in a collision involving an automatic gate in an apartment complex parking lot entrance on [XXX] near [XXX].…On January [XXX], 2024 at 8:03 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Scottsdale, Arizona was in a collision involving an automatic gate in an apartment complex parking lot entrance on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV attempted to enter the apartment complex parking lot entrance as an automatic gate was closing. As the Waymo AV passed the closing gate, the gate made contact with the rear passenger side corner of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-7071ADSWaymo LLC2024-01 17:15San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Street
On January [XXX], 2024 at 5:15 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southboun…On January [XXX], 2024 at 5:15 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX] in the leftmost thru lane, adjacent to a dedicated left turn lane on its left. As the Waymo AV approached the intersection with [XXX], it came to a stop behind its lead vehicle. The passenger vehicle behind the Waymo AV then attempted to change lanes into the dedicated left turn lane, and made contact with the rear driver side corner of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-7156ADSWaymo LLC2024-01 8:24Phoenix, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On January [XXX], 2024, at 7:24 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a truck on [XXX] and [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling westbound on [XXX] in the lef…On January [XXX], 2024, at 7:24 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a truck on [XXX] and [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling westbound on [XXX] in the left lane, and came to a stop behind a stopped construction truck. As the Waymo AV came to a stop, the truck began to reverse and then made contact with the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-7158ADSWaymo LLC2024-01 08:57Phoenix, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSSUVNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On January [XXX], 2024 at 7:57 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped at a red light with multiple other…On January [XXX], 2024 at 7:57 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped at a red light with multiple other vehicles on southbound [XXX] at [XXX], when an SUV with a deflated front driver side tire approached the intersection, traveling westbound on [XXX]. The SUV attempted to make a right turn onto northbound [XXX] at a high rate of speed, and entered the oncoming lanes of traffic where the Waymo AV and other vehicles were stopped at southbound [XXX]. The SUV then made contact with another SUV and a passenger vehicle in the left adjacent lane to the Waymo AV, and pushed the other SUV into the side of the Waymo AV (which was still stationary, waiting at the red light). At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The three other vehicles sustained damage, but the Waymo AV did not. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-7159ADSWaymo LLC2024-01 7:41Tempe, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADASSUVNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On January [XXX], 2024 at 7:41 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at the intersection with the on and off ramps for westbound [XXX]. The …On January [XXX], 2024 at 7:41 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at the intersection with the on and off ramps for westbound [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped in traffic for a red light on southbound [XXX] when an SUV approached from behind and made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-7161ADSWaymo LLC2024-01 20:11San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSBusNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On January [XXX], 2024 at 8:12 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a bus on westbound [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped at a stop sign on…On January [XXX], 2024 at 8:12 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a bus on westbound [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped at a stop sign on westbound [XXX] at the intersection with [XXX] when a bus traveling on southbound [XXX] started to make a left turn onto eastbound [XXX], a narrow road. As the bus performed the left turn onto [XXX], the Waymo AV slowly moved forward and to the right, but the left side of the bus made contact with the rear driver side corner of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-7162ADSWaymo LLC2024-01 00:41San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On January [XXX], 2024 at 12:41 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving two passenger vehicles in the intersection of [XXX] at [XXX] and [XXX]. The…On January [XXX], 2024 at 12:41 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving two passenger vehicles in the intersection of [XXX] at [XXX] and [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped on eastbound [XXX] at a red traffic light with vehicles behind it, preparing to make an unprotected left turn onto eastbound [XXX]. When the light turned green, the Waymo AV proceeded into the intersection on [XXX], then stopped to yield to approaching vehicles. A black passenger vehicle two vehicles behind the Waymo AV then overtook both the Waymo AV and the vehicle behind the Waymo AV, and made contact with the front passenger side corner of a white passenger vehicle turning left in the opposite direction (onto westbound [XXX]). The Waymo AV then moved slightly forward, then came to a stop as the white passenger vehicle then moved backward from the collision with the black passenger vehicle. The rear passenger side corner of the white passenger vehicle made contact with the front passenger side of the Waymo AV. The black passenger vehicle left the scene. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV did not sustain damage, but the other two passenger vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30291-7039ADSNuro2024-01 10:49Houston, TX2022 Toyota PriusADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported18Street
On January [XXX], 2024 a Nuro Prius operating in manual mode side-swiped a parked passenger vehicle. The Nuro human operator reported no injuries and the passenger vehicle did not have occupants. No other individuals wer…On January [XXX], 2024 a Nuro Prius operating in manual mode side-swiped a parked passenger vehicle. The Nuro human operator reported no injuries and the passenger vehicle did not have occupants. No other individuals were involved. The Nuro operator, with assistance from nearby neighbors, was able to contact the vehicle owner and exchange information. The damage to both vehicles was minor, and law enforcement was not contacted. Upon further review of the incident data the week of January 22, Nuro determined that the Prius was in autonomous mode approximately 25 seconds prior to the incident. There was no evidence that the autonomous operation had any impact on the incident.
30291-7106ADSNuro2024-01 14:30Mountain View, CA2022 Toyota PriusADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On Friday, January [XXX], 2024 a Nuro Prius operating autonomously with a safety driver present was stopped at a red light at the intersection of [XXX] and [XXX]. A Mazda approaching the intersection failed to completely…On Friday, January [XXX], 2024 a Nuro Prius operating autonomously with a safety driver present was stopped at a red light at the intersection of [XXX] and [XXX]. A Mazda approaching the intersection failed to completely stop and rear-ended the Nuro Prius. No injuries were reported and no VRUs were involved. Both vehicles sustained minor damage. Law enforcement was not involved.
30291-7107ADSNuro2024-01 19:24Palo Alto, CA2022 Toyota PriusADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported24Intersection
On Wednesday, January [XXX] at approximately 4:20pm, a Nuro Prius was operating in autonomous mode in Palo Alto. As the Nuro Prius proceeded straight through a three-way intersection with right-of-way, a Honda CR-V on th…On Wednesday, January [XXX] at approximately 4:20pm, a Nuro Prius was operating in autonomous mode in Palo Alto. As the Nuro Prius proceeded straight through a three-way intersection with right-of-way, a Honda CR-V on the perpendicular street failed to stop at the stop sign and ran into the driver-side rear corner of the Nuro vehicle. Both vehicles sustained de minimis damage. Law enforcement was not involved and there were no injuries reported or VRUs present.
30450-6958ADSGhost Autonomy Inc.2024-01 16:48San Jose, CA2017 Toyota CamryADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported11Highway / Freeway
A Ghost ADS-equipped car was driving engaged Northbound on [XXX]. As always, there were two safety drivers in the car. Traffic was moving in all four lanes at or near the speed limit. The Ghost vehicle was in the right-m…A Ghost ADS-equipped car was driving engaged Northbound on [XXX]. As always, there were two safety drivers in the car. Traffic was moving in all four lanes at or near the speed limit. The Ghost vehicle was in the right-middle lane. Another vehicle (the "lead" car) entered into the Ghost car's lane from the right. While there were numerous vehicles ahead of the Ghost car before that vehicle entered the lane, the lead vehicle blocked the view of the lane before it. Throughout the incident, traffic in the other three lanes continued at a steady pace. When the lead vehicle entered into the lane ahead of the Ghost car, the Ghost car applied the brakes to accommodate the intrusion and then continued to match the speed of the lead car. The lead car suddenly slammed the brakes. The Ghost car followed suit, reducing its speed from 19 mps (42.5 mph) to 4.7 mps (10.5 mph) within the next three seconds. The Ghost car was able to match the rapid speed reduction of the lead car and avoid contact. The driver following the Ghost car was not able to respond as quickly as the Ghost ADS. When the following driver began to apply the brakes, the car was about five meters behind and was traveling at 6.5 mps. At the point of impact, the Ghost vehicle was traveling at 4.78 mps (10.7 mph), matching the lead car. There were no injuries. The vehicles suffered only cosmetic damage, the drivers exchanged information, and the Ghost safety drivers returned to home base in conventional mode.
30531-7176ADSTransdev Alternative Services2024-01 3:07Chandler, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSSUVNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On January [XXX], 2024 at 2:07 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Chandler, Arizona was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped for a red light on southbound [X…On January [XXX], 2024 at 2:07 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Chandler, Arizona was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped for a red light on southbound [XXX] when an SUV approached from behind and made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the driver's seating position). Both vehicles sustained damage. Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Transdev may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This is a duplicate of report ID: 30270-7034-1.
30610-6950ADSZoox, Inc.2024-01 21:13San Francisco, CA2017 Toyota HighlanderADSSUVNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
A Zoox vehicle (Vehicle 1) in autonomy was stopped at a red traffic light on northbound [XXX] at the intersection with [XXX] in San Francisco. At that time, an SUV (Vehicle 2), heading southbound on [XXX], failed to sto…A Zoox vehicle (Vehicle 1) in autonomy was stopped at a red traffic light on northbound [XXX] at the intersection with [XXX] in San Francisco. At that time, an SUV (Vehicle 2), heading southbound on [XXX], failed to stop for the red traffic light and entered the intersection, causing a collision with a passenger car (Vehicle 3) that was traveling eastbound on [XXX]. The SUV spun after making contact with the passenger car and collided with the stopped Zoox vehicle, damaging the front bumper on the driver's side and driver's side fender, mirror, and sensors on the Zoox vehicle. The police and EMS personnel were called to the scene. The driver of the SUV left the scene without exchanging information. The passenger car appeared to sustain significant damage to the front end. There were no reported injuries.
30610-7110ADSZoox, Inc.2024-01 14:12San Francisco, CA2017 Toyota HighlanderADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Street
A Zoox vehicle (Vehicle 1) in autonomy was traveling on southbound [XXX] near [XXX] in San Francisco. The Zoox vehicle slowed to a gradual stop with brake and hazard lights activated during a simulated pick up-drop off m…A Zoox vehicle (Vehicle 1) in autonomy was traveling on southbound [XXX] near [XXX] in San Francisco. The Zoox vehicle slowed to a gradual stop with brake and hazard lights activated during a simulated pick up-drop off maneuver when it was rear-ended by a minivan (Vehicle 2). The rear bumper of the Zoox vehicle sustained minor damage. There were no reported injuries, and police were not called. Zoox vehicle camera footage shows that the driver of the minivan may not have been looking ahead at the roadway prior to and at the time of contact.
30610-7111ADSZoox, Inc.2024-01 14:19Paradise, NV2017 Toyota HighlanderADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
A Zoox vehicle (vehicle 1) in autonomy was stopped at a red traffic light on southbound [XXX] at [XXX] when it was rear-ended at low speed by a passenger car (vehicle 2). There was minor damage to the Zoox vehicle. There…A Zoox vehicle (vehicle 1) in autonomy was stopped at a red traffic light on southbound [XXX] at [XXX] when it was rear-ended at low speed by a passenger car (vehicle 2). There was minor damage to the Zoox vehicle. There were no reported injuries and police were not called. Zoox vehicle camera footage shows that the driver of the passenger car may not have been looking ahead at the roadway prior to and at the time of contact.
30792-7147ADSWeRide Corp2024-01 12:56San Jose, CA2023 Nissan LEAFADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported2Street
At approximately 12:56pm, a WeRide vehicle (car 1) was slowing to a stop ( 3mph) on [XXX] at the intersection of [XXX] to turn left in an effort to yield to crossing pedestrians. At this time a Toyota Prius (car 2) trave…At approximately 12:56pm, a WeRide vehicle (car 1) was slowing to a stop ( 3mph) on [XXX] at the intersection of [XXX] to turn left in an effort to yield to crossing pedestrians. At this time a Toyota Prius (car 2) traveling (10mph) had slammed into car 1's rear - causing damage primarily to car 1. Both parties pulled over to a safe location to exchange information but the driver of car 2 could not provide a valid insurance or registration certificate.
33175-9307ADSMobileye Vision Technologies2024-01 09:00Austin, TX2023 Volkswagen ID.BuzzADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On FEB-2024, Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. ("VW") filed an Incident Report (NHTSA-provided Report ID-1420-7081- the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "SGO"). …On FEB-2024, Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. ("VW") filed an Incident Report (NHTSA-provided Report ID-1420-7081- the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "SGO"). The subject vehicle referred to in the Report contains the Reporter's software and hardware. Since the Reporter is also a Reporting Entity under the SGO, the Reporter hereby submits this report. In order to avoid duplications and additional CBI requests, this submission includes the publicly available information of the Report and incorporates the Report by reference. This submission is based on the information provided to the Reporter by VW. The Reporter currently believes that it has no independent knowledge of the information in this report. From Volkswagen: The subject vehicle was stopped at a traffic light at the corner of [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION] and [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION] (Austin,TX) while traveling westbound on [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION] While ADS was engaged, the subject vehicle was stationary, the passenger car behind the subject vehicle proceeded forward from a stationary position and bumped into the rear bumper of the subject vehicle. The passenger vehicle reversed away from the subject vehicle. The operator of the subject vehicle then turned on the hazard lights, proceeded through the intersection once the light changed to green and turned right onto [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION] in order to check for a safe spot to park. The passenger vehicle, after reversing away from the subject vehicle, did not follow the subject vehicle and instead proceeded to turn right onto [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION]. Once the operator pulled over they then followed protocol to call in the incident, took photos to document, and waited for manager and service to arrive at the scene to verify the damage. There were no known injuries, airbag deployments, or tow-away of anyone involved. There was no significant damage to the subject vehicle and it was driven back to the depot to debrief and provide information to incident response team on the incident.
12381-6889ADSDaimler Trucks North America, LLC2023-12 14:35Vega, TX2023 Freightliner CascadiaADSAnimalNo Injuries Reported65Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30270-6878ADSWaymo LLC2023-12 10:27Phoenix, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPickup TruckNo Injuries Reported23Intersection
On December [XXX], 2023 at 10:27 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a pickup truck being towed on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling eastbound …On December [XXX], 2023 at 10:27 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a pickup truck being towed on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling eastbound on [XXX] in the left lane, with a center left turn lane to the adjacent left, and one lane to the right. The Waymo AV approached a pickup truck being towed backwards and at an angle. The truck towing the pickup truck was traveling straight in the middle turn lane, also traveling eastbound on [XXX], and the pickup truck being towed was partially in the same lane as the Waymo AV and partially in the middle turn lane. As the Waymo AV and combination vehicle approached [XXX], the front left of the Waymo AV made contact with the pickup truck being towed. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV and the pickup truck sustained damage. Several minutes prior, a second collision occurred between another Waymo AV and the pickup being towed, which will be included in the monthly submission. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away as a result of the crash. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-6901ADSWaymo LLC2023-12 15:38Phoenix, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported10Intersection
On December [XXX], 2023 at 2:38 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX]…On December [XXX], 2023 at 2:38 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX] and preparing to make a left turn onto eastbound [XXX]. As it approached the intersection, the Waymo AV slowed to yield to oncoming traffic. As the oncoming traffic passed and the Waymo AV began to initiate the turn, a passenger vehicle approached from behind and made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-6907ADSWaymo LLC2023-12 00:16Scottsdale, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPickup TruckNo Injuries Reported2Street
On December [XXX], 2023 at 11:16 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Scottsdale, Arizona was in a collision involving a pickup truck on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling eastbound on [XXX]…On December [XXX], 2023 at 11:16 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Scottsdale, Arizona was in a collision involving a pickup truck on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling eastbound on [XXX] when it came to a stop behind a pickup truck parked at an angle to the street. As the Waymo AV began to proceed, the pickup truck began to reverse and then made contact with the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and three of the four passengers were wearing seatbelts. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-7006ADSWaymo LLC2023-12 15:23San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSMotorcycleNo Injuries Reported3Street
On December [XXX], 2023 at 3:23 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was struck by a motorcycle on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling westbound on [XXX] when a motor…On December [XXX], 2023 at 3:23 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was struck by a motorcycle on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling westbound on [XXX] when a motorcycle that had been traveling behind the Waymo AV passed the Waymo AV on the left, lane-splitting. As the motorcycle passed the Waymo AV, the motorcycle made contact with the driver side rear sensor of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage, and the motorcycle did not stop, leaving the scene without exchanging information. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-7007ADSWaymo LLC2023-12 15:23San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported0Street
On December [XXX], 2023 at 3:23 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a heavy truck on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling westbound on …On December [XXX], 2023 at 3:23 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a heavy truck on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling westbound on [XXX] following behind a heavy truck. The heavy truck came to a stop, began to back up, proceeded forward, and then stopped again. The Waymo AV came to a stop both times the heavy truck stopped (moving a short distance at a low speed in between the stops). While the Waymo AV remained stopped the second time, the heavy truck began to reverse again and made contact with the front of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-7010ADSWaymo LLC2023-12 22:23Tempe, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSSUVNo Injuries Reported3Intersection
On December [XXX], 2023 at 10:23 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped behind a motorcycle at a red light…On December [XXX], 2023 at 10:23 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped behind a motorcycle at a red light heading southeast on [XXX] as it approached the intersection at [XXX]. While the traffic light was still red, the motorcycle moved forward, and the Waymo AV slowly nudged closer to the stop line. An SUV approached from behind and made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the drivers seating position). Both vehicles sustained damage, and the SUV left the scene without exchanging information. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-7012ADSWaymo LLC2023-12 19:02Tempe, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported33Intersection
On December [XXX], 2023 at 7:02 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX] in …On December [XXX], 2023 at 7:02 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX] in the rightmost lane of three lanes in the southbound direction. After the Waymo AV crossed the intersection with [XXX], an SUV in the leftmost lane initiated a right lane change in front of a passenger car in the middle lane. The passenger car in the middle lane then moved into the rightmost lane, and the passengers side of the passenger car made contact with the front drivers side of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-7013ADSWaymo LLC2023-12 10:25Phoenix, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPickup TruckNo Injuries Reported35Street
On December [XXX], 2023 at 10:25 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a pickup truck being towed on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southboun…On December [XXX], 2023 at 10:25 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a pickup truck being towed on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX] in the left lane, with a center left turn lane to the adjacent left, and one lane to the right. The Waymo AV approached a pickup truck being towed backwards and at an angle. The truck towing the pickup truck was traveling straight in the middle turn lane, also traveling southbound on [XXX], and the pickup truck being towed was partially in the same lane as the Waymo AV and partially in the middle turn lane. As the Waymo AV and combination vehicle were proceeding straight, the front left of the Waymo AV made contact with the pickup truck being towed. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV and the pickup truck sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-7014ADSWaymo LLC2023-12 13:46San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Street
On December [XXX], 2023 at 1:46 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was parked on eastbound […On December [XXX], 2023 at 1:46 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was parked on eastbound [XXX] near the entrance to a parking garage on its right side. As a passenger car that was exiting the parking garage made a left turn, the drivers side of the passenger car made contact with the front of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage and the passenger car left the scene without exchanging information. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-7015ADSWaymo LLC2023-12 12:18San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On December [XXX], 2023 at 12:18 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a heavy truck on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was making a left turn from …On December [XXX], 2023 at 12:18 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a heavy truck on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was making a left turn from a dedicated left turn lane on [XXX] into the rightmost lane of two lanes in the southwest-bound direction of [XXX]. A heavy truck was making the same left turn in front of the Waymo AV. The heavy truck had made the turn onto [XXX] and was partially in the rightmost lane and partially in the leftmost lane of southwest-bound [XXX] when the Waymo AV initiated its left turn into the rightmost lane on southwest-bound [XXX] and came to a stop just after entering the rightmost lane because the heavy truck had come to a stop. While the Waymo AV remained stopped, the heavy truck began to reverse and then made contact with the front of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-7017ADSWaymo LLC2023-12 22:48Phoenix, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported13Intersection
On December [XXX], 2023 at 10:48 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX] w…On December [XXX], 2023 at 10:48 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX] when it began to brake for a red light as it approached the intersection of [XXX] . The passenger car that was traveling directly behind the Waymo AV then made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-7018ADSWaymo LLC2023-12 14:00Phoenix, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPickup TruckNo Injuries Reported0Street
On December [XXX], 2023 at 2:00 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a pickup truck on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was parked at the curb on the right…On December [XXX], 2023 at 2:00 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a pickup truck on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was parked at the curb on the right side of [XXX] when a pickup truck that had been previously parked in the driveway on the opposite side of the street began reversing and reversed into the drivers side door of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-7019ADSWaymo LLC2023-12 17:09San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported12Street
On December [XX], 2023 at 5:09 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling in the left…On December [XX], 2023 at 5:09 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling in the leftmost lane of southbound [XXX] when it began to brake as vehicles ahead of it slowed to make unprotected left turns onto eastbound [XXX]. A passenger car that had been traveling in the right adjacent lane behind the Waymo AV initiated a left lane change, and the front of the passenger car made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-7020ADSWaymo LLC2023-12 16:32Tempe, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSSUVNo Injuries Reported0Parking Lot
On December [XXX], 2023 at 4:32 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving an SUV inside a parking lot on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped near the en…On December [XXX], 2023 at 4:32 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving an SUV inside a parking lot on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped near the entrance of the parking lot, yielding to pedestrians crossing in front of it, when an SUV that was parked in a parking spot to the right of the Waymo AV began reversing. The drivers side rear of the SUV then made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-7021ADSWaymo LLC2023-12 23:48San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSSUVNo Injuries Reported0Street
On December [XXX], 2023 at 11:48 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX…On December [XXX], 2023 at 11:48 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX] when it came to a stop to pick up a passenger. As an oncoming SUV proceeded straight past the Waymo AV, the drivers side rear of the SUV made contact with the drivers side rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30330-6882ADSTORC Robotics, Inc.2023-12 14:35Vega, TX2023 Freightliner CascadiaADSAnimalNo Injuries Reported65Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30410-6792ADSMotional2023-12 13:24Las Vegas, NV2022 Hyundai Ioniq 5ADSSUVNo Injuries Reported0IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30531-7022ADSTransdev Alternative Services2023-12 22:23Tempe, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSSUVNo Injuries Reported3Intersection
On December [XXX], 2023 at 10:23 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped behind a motorcycle at a red ligh…On December [XXX], 2023 at 10:23 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped behind a motorcycle at a red light heading southeast on [XXX] as it approached the intersection at [XXX]. While the traffic light was still red, the motorcycle moved forward, and the Waymo AV slowly nudged closer to the stop line. An SUV approached from behind and made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the driver's seating position). Both vehicles sustained damage, and the SUV left the scene without exchanging information. Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Transdev may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30630-6900ADSAmbarella2023-12 16:00Las Vegas, NV2020 Lexus RX450HADSSUVNo Injuries Reported18Street
The subject vehicle began its testing drive from the Embassy Suites parking lot with the subject vehicle engaged in autonomous mode. Two operators were seated in the front seats of the subject vehicle. At the start of …The subject vehicle began its testing drive from the Embassy Suites parking lot with the subject vehicle engaged in autonomous mode. Two operators were seated in the front seats of the subject vehicle. At the start of the route the operators confirmed that all the ADS hardware and software were working properly. The subject vehicle drove south on [XXX] toward [XXX] and then turned right on [XXX]. After making the right turn onto [XXX], the operators of the subject vehicle noticed a stopped car (the Honda Pilot) on the stop line of the exit of a parking area of a retail center waiting to enter onto [XXX]. The subject vehicle was driving in the far right lane with the flow of traffic at approximately 30km/h (18mph). As the subject vehicle passed in front of the Honda Pilot, the Honda Pilot began to exit the parking lot without yielding. The Honda Pilot's front bumper collided with the right rear part of the subject vehicle, causing damage to the right rear body and rear right wheel of the subject vehicle. The damage to the right rear wheel of the subject vehicle required tow truck assistance. The Honda Pilot sustained damage to its front bumper but did not require tow truck assistance. No persons have reported injuries. No other vehicles or other property were involved in the incident. On the scene of the incident, the driver of the Honda Pilot admitted fault for the accident to the subject vehicle's operators.
669-6808ADSHyundai Motor America2023-12 13:24Las Vegas, NV2022 Hyundai IONIQ 5ADSSUVNo Injuries Reported0IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30270-6765ADSWaymo LLC2023-11 17:40Scottsdale, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On November [XXX], 2023 at 5:40 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Scottsdale, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] and [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling northbound on [XXX…On November [XXX], 2023 at 5:40 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Scottsdale, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] and [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling northbound on [XXX] and was approaching the intersection with [XXX], when it detected an approaching emergency vehicle, which was traveling southbound on [XXX] and approaching the intersection with [XXX]. The Waymo AV braked to a stop soon after passing the nearside crosswalk in an attempt to keep the intersection clear for the emergency vehicle. A passenger vehicle approached from behind and then made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-6838ADSWaymo LLC2023-11 10:09Tempe, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries Reported2Parking Lot
On November [XXX] , 2023 at 10:09 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving a chain in a parking lot at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling in a parking lot at [XX…On November [XXX] , 2023 at 10:09 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving a chain in a parking lot at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling in a parking lot at [XXX] when it made contact with a hanging chain separating a section of the parking lot. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-6839ADSWaymo LLC2023-11 15:44San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On November [XXX], 2023 at 3:44 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped in the rightmost…On November [XXX], 2023 at 3:44 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped in the rightmost non-HOV lane on northbound [XXX] waiting for the intersection at [XXX] to clear during a green light. The passenger car behind the Waymo AV was rear-ended by a pickup truck, causing the front of the passenger car to make contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the drivers seating position). All three vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-6853ADSWaymo LLC2023-11 04:06Austin, TX2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPickup TruckNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On November [XXX], 2023 at 4:06 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Austin, Texas was in a collision involving a pickup truck on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX] and sto…On November [XXX], 2023 at 4:06 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Austin, Texas was in a collision involving a pickup truck on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX] and stopped at a red light on [XXX], preparing to make a right turn onto southbound [XXX]. A pickup truck approached from behind and made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the drivers seating position). Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-6854ADSWaymo LLC2023-11 21:36Tempe, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries Reported10Parking Lot
On November [XXX], 2023 at 8:36 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving an automatic gate at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling northbound through a parking lot…On November [XXX], 2023 at 8:36 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving an automatic gate at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling northbound through a parking lot at an apartment complex, heading toward [XXX]. An automatic gate was closing as the Waymo AV approached, and the gate made contact with the rear side sensors of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-6855ADSWaymo LLC2023-11 15:46San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSVanNo Injuries Reported0Street
On November [XXX], 2023 at 3:46 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a van on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX] i…On November [XXX], 2023 at 3:46 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a van on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX] in the middle lane in stop-and-go traffic. It had just passed [XXX] when it initiated a left lane change, planning to proceed ahead of a van in the adjacent left lane. As the Waymo AV nudged into the adjacent lane, the van accelerated and its front passenger side quarter panel made contact with the Waymo AVs driver side quarter panel. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-6857ADSWaymo LLC2023-11 19:59Los Angeles, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On November [XXX], 2023 at 7:59 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Los Angeles, California was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped for a red ligh…On November [XXX], 2023 at 7:59 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Los Angeles, California was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped for a red light facing southeast on [XXX] at [XXX] when a passenger vehicle approached from behind and made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the drivers seating position). The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30490-6590ADSBeep, Inc.2023-11 11:02Orlando, FLNavya ARMA AutonomADSBusNo Injuries Reported6Intersection
At approximately 11:02 a.m. on Saturday, November [XXX], 2023, at [XXX] near [XXX] in the City of Orlando, a Beep-operated autonomous shuttle (P139) was involved in a collision with a City of Orlando LYNX bus resulting i…At approximately 11:02 a.m. on Saturday, November [XXX], 2023, at [XXX] near [XXX] in the City of Orlando, a Beep-operated autonomous shuttle (P139) was involved in a collision with a City of Orlando LYNX bus resulting in moderate damage to the shuttle and minor damage to the Lynx bus. There were no injuries reported. Local police responded to the scene and conducted a traffic investigation. The Beep shuttle was towed from the scene for transport to the maintenance facility. The LYNX bus did not require towing and drove from the scene.
30490-6821ADSBeep, Inc.2023-11 11:02Orlando, FL2020 Navya ARMAADSBusNo Injuries Reported6Intersection
At approximately 11:02 a.m. on Saturday, November [XXX], 2023, at [XXX] near [XXX] in the City of Orlando, a Beep-operated autonomous shuttle (P139) was involved in a collision with a City of Orlando LYNX bus resulting i…At approximately 11:02 a.m. on Saturday, November [XXX], 2023, at [XXX] near [XXX] in the City of Orlando, a Beep-operated autonomous shuttle (P139) was involved in a collision with a City of Orlando LYNX bus resulting in moderate damage to the shuttle and minor damage to the Lynx bus. There were no injuries reported. Local police responded to the scene and conducted a traffic investigation. The Beep shuttle was towed from the scene for transport to the maintenance facility. The LYNX bus did not require towing and drove from the scene. Monthly update to previously submitted report 30490-6590-1.
30530-6818ADSAurora Operations, Inc.2023-11 09:56Ranger, TX2023 Peterbilt 579ADSPickup TruckNo Injuries Reported67Highway / Freeway
This incident occurred near Ranger, TX on [XXX] at approximately 9:56 am CT on Nov. [XXX], 2023. The Aurora vehicle was operating in autonomy at the time. Conditions were overcast, with light rain. As the Aurora vehicle …This incident occurred near Ranger, TX on [XXX] at approximately 9:56 am CT on Nov. [XXX], 2023. The Aurora vehicle was operating in autonomy at the time. Conditions were overcast, with light rain. As the Aurora vehicle was driving in its lane at 67 mph, a Ford pick-up truck overtaking the Aurora vehicle in the rightmost lane at approximately 80 mph appears to have hydroplaned, lost control, and hit the passenger-side rear portion of the trailer. Before the collision, the Aurora Driver detected the pick-up trucks encroachment into the Aurora vehicles lane and initiated a nudge to the left to provide space. This was insufficient to completely avoid the collision, and the pick-up truck made contact with the passenger side rear of the trailer. The Aurora Driver detected the collision and made the decision to initiate an incident response, but before it could execute that response, the Vehicle Operator took over control of the system and proceeded in manual. The Vehicle Operator received the notification that a collision had been detected and was initiating an incident response. The Vehicle Operator did not visually observe the collision and therefore assumed the reaction of the Aurora Driver to be a software anomaly worth escalated attention, rather than the correct detection of a collision and thus reported the incident through our escalated annotation protocol, rather than through our incident response protocols. We identified the incident at approximately 8:45 am CT on December [XXX], 2023, through a review of our data logs. At this time, we are not aware of any injuries and, from camera footage, the pick-up truck also appears to have left the scene of the incident. There is also no indication of any cargo or major trailer damage.
30531-6862ADSTransdev Alternative Services2023-11 15:44San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On November [XXX], 2023 at 3:44 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped in the rightmo…On November [XXX], 2023 at 3:44 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped in the rightmost non-HOV lane on northbound [XXX] waiting for the intersection at [XXX] to clear during a green light. The passenger car behind the Waymo AV was rear-ended by a pickup truck, causing the front of the passenger car to make contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the driver's seating position). All three vehicles sustained damage. Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Transdev may supplement or correct its reporting. This is a duplicate of report ID 30270-6839-1.
30531-6863ADSTransdev Alternative Services2023-11 04:06Austin, TX2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPickup TruckNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On November [XXX], 2023 at 4:06 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Austin, Texas was in a collision involving a pickup truck on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX] and s…On November [XXX], 2023 at 4:06 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Austin, Texas was in a collision involving a pickup truck on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX] and stopped at a red light on [XXX], preparing to make a right turn onto southbound [XXX]. A pickup truck approached from behind and made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the driver's seating position). Both vehicles sustained damage. Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Transdev may supplement or correct its reporting in the future. This report is a duplicate of report ID 30270-6853-1.
30531-6864ADSTransdev Alternative Services2023-11 19:59Los Angeles, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On November [XXX], 2023 at 7:59 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Los Angeles, California was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped for a red li…On November [XXX], 2023 at 7:59 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Los Angeles, California was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped for a red light facing southeast on [XXX] at [XXX] when a passenger vehicle approached from behind and made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the driver's seating position). The Waymo AV sustained damage. Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Transdev may supplement or correct its reporting in the future. This is a duplicate of report ID: 30270-6857-1.
988-6859ADSPACCAR Incorporated2023-11 09:56Ranger, TX2023 Peterbilt 579ADSPickup TruckNo Injuries Reported67Highway / Freeway
Reference: Aurora Operations, Inc. NHTSA-Provided Report # 30530-6818-1 This incident occurred near Ranger, TX on [XXX] approximately 9:56 am CT on November [XXX], 2023. The Aurora vehicle was operating in autonomy at t…Reference: Aurora Operations, Inc. NHTSA-Provided Report # 30530-6818-1 This incident occurred near Ranger, TX on [XXX] approximately 9:56 am CT on November [XXX], 2023. The Aurora vehicle was operating in autonomy at the time. Conditions were overcast, with light rain. As the Aurora vehicle was driving in its lane at 67 mph, a Ford pick-up truck overtaking the Aurora vehicle in the rightmost lane at approximately 80 mph appears to have hydroplaned, lost control, and hit the passenger-side rear portion of the trailer. Before the collision, the Aurora Driver detected the pick-up truck's encroachment into the Aurora vehicle's lane and initiated a nudge to the left to provide space. This was insufficient to completely avoid the collision, and the pickup truck made contact with the passenger side rear of the trailer. The Aurora Driver detected the collision and made the decision to initiate an incident response, but before it could execute that response, the Vehicle Operator took over control of the system and proceeded in manual. The Vehicle Operator received the notification that a collision had been detected and was initiating an incident response. The Vehicle Operator did not visually observe the collision and therefore assumed the reaction of the Aurora Driver to be a software anomaly worth escalated attention, rather than the correct detection of a collision and thus reported the incident through our escalated annotation protocol, rather than through our incident response protocols. We identified the incident at approximately 8:45 am CT on December [XXX], 2023 through a review of our data logs. At this time, we are not aware of any injuries and, from camera footage, the pick-up truck also appears to have left the scene of the incident. There is also no indication of any cargo or major trailer damage.
30270-6385 v2ADSWaymo LLC2023-10 17:47San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Street
Other than correcting the Pre-Crash Speed of the Waymo AV, the content of this report is unchanged from the initial report submitted on October 2, 2023 [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION]. On Octob…Other than correcting the Pre-Crash Speed of the Waymo AV, the content of this report is unchanged from the initial report submitted on October 2, 2023 [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION]. On October [XXX], 2023 at 5:47 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] near [XXX] and [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling westbound on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV then began to turn right from [XXX] into a parking lot at [XXX]. As the Waymo AV began to enter the parking lot, it stopped for an approaching skateboarder. The passenger car traveling behind the Waymo AV then made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vulnerable road user influenced the driving task of a vehicle involved. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-6529 v2ADSWaymo LLC2023-10 9:24San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSNon-Motorist: CyclistNo Injuries Reported13Intersection
The content of this report is unchanged from the initial report submitted on October 18, 2023 [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION]. On October [XXX], 2023 at 9:24 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (W…The content of this report is unchanged from the initial report submitted on October 18, 2023 [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION]. On October [XXX], 2023 at 9:24 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a cyclist on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was in autonomous mode on eastbound [XXX] preparing to make a right turn onto southbound [XXX] and had stopped to yield, first for pedestrians to cross [XXX] and then for a cyclist approaching from behind traveling eastbound on the sidewalk of [XXX]. As the pedestrians finished crossing [XXX] but before the cyclist had reached [XXX], the Waymo AV test driver took manual control of the Waymo AV and began to accelerate and perform the right turn onto [XXX]. After the Waymo AV entered the crosswalk, the cyclist entered the crosswalk and made contact with the passengers rear quarter panel of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was not engaged and a test driver was operating the Waymo AV in manual mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vulnerable road user was involved. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-6548ADSWaymo LLC2023-10 18:53Phoenix, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries Reported8Street
On October [XXX], 2023 at 6:53 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona experienced underbody damage in a construction zone on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling through a const…On October [XXX], 2023 at 6:53 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona experienced underbody damage in a construction zone on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling through a construction zone on eastbound [XXX] and prepared to make a left turn onto northbound [XXX]. The Waymo AV entered a lane undergoing construction on [XXX], encountered a section of roadway that had been removed, and the front drivers side wheel dropped off the paved roadway. At the time of the event, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-6561ADSWaymo LLC2023-10 13:29Phoenix, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries Reported19Street
On October [XXX], 2023 at 1:29 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving an automatic gate in a parking lot driveway at Central High School. The Waymo AV exit…On October [XXX], 2023 at 1:29 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving an automatic gate in a parking lot driveway at Central High School. The Waymo AV exited a parking lot at Central High School and was traveling eastbound toward [XXX], when the passengers side sensors and side mirror made contact with an automatic gate that was in the process of closing. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-6661ADSWaymo LLC2023-10 08:03San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPickup TruckNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On October [XXX], 2023 at 8:03 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a pickup truck on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was proceeding north on [XXX]…On October [XXX], 2023 at 8:03 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a pickup truck on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was proceeding north on [XXX] in the rightmost lane when it came to a stop at the intersection with [XXX] as a result of a stop sign that had been leaned against a barrier near the corner of the intersection and was visible from the roadway. The front of the pickup truck traveling behind the Waymo AV made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01.
30270-6662ADSWaymo LLC2023-10 17:42San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Street
On October [XXX], 2023 at 5:42 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV came to a stop in the rightmo…On October [XXX], 2023 at 5:42 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV came to a stop in the rightmost travel lane heading south on [XXX] at [XXX], behind a van that was unloading passengers and cargo in the travel lane. As the Waymo AV was awaiting an opportunity to maneuver into the left lane to pass the van, the passenger car behind the Waymo AV maneuvered into the left lane to pass both vehicles. As the passenger car passed the Waymo AV, the drivers side of the passenger car made contact with the rear left corner of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01.
30270-6663ADSWaymo LLC2023-10 16:10San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported1Street
On October [XXX], 2023 at 4:10 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, CA was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. As the Waymo AV was traveling northeast on [XXX] …On October [XXX], 2023 at 4:10 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, CA was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. As the Waymo AV was traveling northeast on [XXX] approaching the intersection with [XXX], it began passing a passenger car that was stopped on the other half of the roadway with its front partially in a perpendicular parking space and the rest of the vehicle perpendicular across part of the travel lane. While the Waymo AV was passing the passenger car, the passenger car initiated a reversing maneuver into the lane where the Waymo AV was passing, and the rear right corner of the passenger car made contact with the left side of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The passenger car sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01.
30270-6664ADSWaymo LLC2023-10 18:02Phoenix, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSVanNo Injuries Reported0Parking Lot
On October [XXX], 2023 at 6:02 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a shuttle van in a parking lot at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped in the parking lot …On October [XXX], 2023 at 6:02 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a shuttle van in a parking lot at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped in the parking lot at [XXX] when a shuttle van passed the Waymo AV. As the van was passing behind the Waymo AV, the right side of the van made contact with the rear left corner of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01.
30270-6665ADSWaymo LLC2023-10 07:48San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSSUVNo Injuries Reported23Intersection
On October [XXX], 2023 at 7:48 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling westbound on [XXX] in…On October [XXX], 2023 at 7:48 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling westbound on [XXX] in the rightmost lane. As the SUV in the left adjacent lane traveling alongside the Waymo AV initiated a right lane change, the front passengers side of the SUV made contact with the front drivers side of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was not engaged as the test driver transitioned the Waymo AV to manual mode just before the contact. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01.
30270-6666ADSWaymo LLC2023-10 17:14San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSVanNo Injuries Reported0Street
On October [XXX], 2023 at 5:14 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a van on [XXX] near [XXX] The Waymo AV had stopped for a drop-off on northbo…On October [XXX], 2023 at 5:14 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a van on [XXX] near [XXX] The Waymo AV had stopped for a drop-off on northbound [XXX] and yielded to a van traveling south on [XXX] after the passengers had exited. The van attempted to slowly pass the Waymo AV, and as it did so, the rear drivers side tire and rear bumper of the van made contact with the front drivers side tire of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The van sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01.
30270-6667ADSWaymo LLC2023-10 03:11San Francisco, CA2023 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported1Street
On October [XXX], 2023 at 3:11 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, CA was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling slowly (less than 5 …On October [XXX], 2023 at 3:11 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, CA was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling slowly (less than 5 miles per hour) west on [XXX] near [XXX] in heavy pedestrian traffic in the street when it stopped to yield to a crossing pedestrian. The front of the passenger car traveling behind the Waymo AV made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01.
30270-6668ADSWaymo LLC2023-10 11:04Tempe, AZ2023 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported3Intersection
On October [XXX], 2023 at 11:04 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Tempe, AZ was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] and [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southeast on [XXX] when it s…On October [XXX], 2023 at 11:04 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Tempe, AZ was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] and [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southeast on [XXX] when it slowed to stop for a red traffic light at the intersection with [XXX]. The front of the passenger car that was traveling behind the Waymo AV made contact with the rear of the Wamyo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01.
30391-6563ADSKodiak Robotics2023-10 15:08Fort Worth, TX2019 Kenworth Motor Truck Co T680ADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported34Highway / Freeway
On October [XXX], 2023 at 3:08 PM CT a tractor-trailer entered the lane of a Kodiak Autonomous Vehicle (Kodiak AV) Kenworth Class 8 semi-truck and made minor contact. The Kodiak AV was driving westbound on [XXX] in Fort …On October [XXX], 2023 at 3:08 PM CT a tractor-trailer entered the lane of a Kodiak Autonomous Vehicle (Kodiak AV) Kenworth Class 8 semi-truck and made minor contact. The Kodiak AV was driving westbound on [XXX] in Fort Worth, Texas near [XXX]. The Kodiak AV was operating with a safety driver (in the drivers seating position), who transitioned the vehicle from autonomous to manual mode approximately 5 seconds prior to impact, due to the other truck encroaching on the Kodiak AVs lane. At the time of impact, the Kodiak AV was in manual mode. No injuries occurred in the incident. The Kodiak AV pulled over after the incident, and the other driver continued down the road. The Kodiak AV's mirror-mounted SensorPod sustained minor scratches. Kodiak may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.

What this table is and is not. Rows are the operators' own filings, not verified cases, and a filing does not establish fault. NHTSA redacts most Level 2 narratives as confidential business information, so the text column is empty for most Tesla rows; the structured columns are not redacted. When one crash is filed by several entities, an operator and the fleet owner for example, NHTSA gives the filings one same_incident_id; the "one row per incident" view collapses them into a single row at the highest severity any filer alleged, with the count of filings and every report number beside it, so a count of incidents or deaths is not inflated by duplicate filings. The table joins NHTSA's current files (incidents from June 2025, after the third amended order) with its 2021-2025 archive, which used an older layout: severity labels, roadway and weather fields differ between the two sets, and the source_set column in the CSV says which one a row came from. Level 2 reports are shown here because the file contains them, but they are not cases in the register, which counts a vehicle as a robot only when nobody inside is responsible for driving. Source: NHTSA SGO 2021-01. On 7 November 2026 we filed a public comment built on this table in the California Public Utilities Commission's Rulemaking R.12-12-011, asking for machine-readable mileage files and a crosswalk between the Commission's incident categories and the SGO definitions. The themed reading of the driverless narratives is on the reports page.