The MachineRecord
NHTSA Standing General Order 2021-01

The SGO file, in a form you can search

NHTSA publishes the crash reports as three CSV files of 116 columns each, with several versions of the same report mixed in. This is the same data as one table: driverless systems (ADS) and Level 2 driver assistance side by side, 2021 to today including NHTSA's archive, one row per report at its latest version, every row traceable to its NHTSA report number. Free, CC BY 4.0, refreshed from NHTSA on every pipeline run.

Reports
8612
Fatal
87
Of them Level 2
79
Reporting entities
64
Incidents
2019-08 to 2026-09
Clear filters

1995 reports, showing 1501 to 1600.

Report IDCaseProgramEntityIncidentPlaceVehicleEngagedCrash withSeveritySpeed, mphRoadwayNarrative
30270-6352ADSWaymo LLC2023-09 18:26San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On September [XXX], 2023 at 6:26 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. While the Waymo AV was stopped in park …On September [XXX], 2023 at 6:26 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. While the Waymo AV was stopped in park waiting to pick up a passenger near the right side curb of the road on westbound [XXX], a passenger car that was passing the stopped Waymo AV made contact with the rear drivers side of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-6405ADSWaymo LLC2023-09 19:12San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported8Intersection
On September [XXX], 2023 at 7:12 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling westbound on …On September [XXX], 2023 at 7:12 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling westbound on [XXX] and approached the stop sign intersection at [XXX]. As the Waymo AV came to a full stop, a city bus was proceeding through the intersection, traveling eastbound on [XXX]. As the city bus continued to proceed through the intersection, the Waymo AV began to proceed forward. The Waymo AV entered the intersection as the city bus proceeded through and exited the intersection, and at the same time, a passenger car traveling northbound on [XXX] that had been occluded by the city bus had also entered the intersection. The passenger car and the Waymo AV then made contact in the middle of the intersection. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-6514ADSWaymo LLC2023-09 22:48San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSBusNo Injuries Reported0Street
On September [XXX], 2023 at 10:48 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a bus on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped on the right lane of a m…On September [XXX], 2023 at 10:48 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a bus on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped on the right lane of a multi-lane road when a city bus attempted to pass using the adjacent left lane. The rear right fender of the bus made contact with the left rear sensor of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-6515ADSWaymo LLC2023-09 19:41San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Street
On September [XXX], 2023 at 7:41 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was parked facing north on …On September [XXX], 2023 at 7:41 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was parked facing north on [XXX] when a passenger vehicle that was parked on the opposite side of the street started reversing, and reversed into the left rear bumper of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-6517ADSWaymo LLC2023-09 09:24San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported0Street
On September [XXX], 2023 at 9:24 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a truck on [XXX] an [XXX]. The Waymo AV had pulled over to the curb and par…On September [XXX], 2023 at 9:24 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a truck on [XXX] an [XXX]. The Waymo AV had pulled over to the curb and parked on the right side of [XXX] when a truck directly in front of the Waymo AV reversed and made contact with the front of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-6518ADSWaymo LLC2023-09 20:20San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Street
On September [XXX], 2023 at 8:20 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was parked on the right sid…On September [XXX], 2023 at 8:20 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was parked on the right side on [XXX] when a passenger vehicle that had been previously parked in the driveway on the opposite side of the street began reversing and reversed into the left rear door of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-6522 v2ADSWaymo LLC2023-09 21:00San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On September [XXX], 2023 at 9:00 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at the intersection with [XXX]. The Waymo AV was…On September [XXX], 2023 at 9:00 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at the intersection with [XXX]. The Waymo AV was proceeding south on [XXX] in the leftmost lane and entered the slip lane to proceed north on [XXX]. As the Waymo AV came to a stop for a red light at the intersection with [XXX], the front of the passenger car which was following behind the Waymo AV made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. The Waymo AV sustained damage. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. The previously submitted version of this report incorrectly listed the wrong zip code, and "September 20th" was noted as the date of this event in the narrative. This updated submission has been corrected to reflect the correct zip code and date.
30412-6436ADSCruise LLC2023-09 22:16San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-6438ADSCruise LLC2023-09 17:32San Francisco, CA2022 Cruise AVADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported0StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-6442ADSCruise LLC2023-09 23:56San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported10IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-6446ADSCruise LLC2023-09 09:37San Francisco, CA2020 Cruise AVADSVanNo Injuries Reported10StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-6447ADSCruise LLC2023-09 08:42San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported3IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30531-6354ADSTransdev Alternative Services2023-09 20:34San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSSUVNo Injuries Reported0Street
On September [XXX], 2023 at 8:34 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] near [XXX]. While the Waymo AV was pulled over in the rig…On September [XXX], 2023 at 8:34 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] near [XXX]. While the Waymo AV was pulled over in the right lane on northbound [XXX], an SUV that was passing the parked Waymo AV made contact with the rear driver's side of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was not engaged and a test driver was operating the Waymo AV in manual mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vechile involved was towed away. Transdev may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This is a duplicate of report ID 30270-6351-1.
30531-6533ADSTransdev Alternative Services2023-09 21:00San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On September [XXX], 2023 at 9:00 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at the intersection with [XXX]. The Waymo AV was…On September [XXX], 2023 at 9:00 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at the intersection with [XXX]. The Waymo AV was proceeding south on [XXX] in the leftmost lane and entered the slip lane to proceed north on [XXX]. As the Waymo AV came to a stop for a red light at the intersection with [XXX], the front of the passenger car which was following behind the Waymo AV made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. The Waymo AV sustained damage. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present. Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this crash under Request No 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. This is a duplicate of report ID 30270-6522-1.
30590-6382ADSApple Inc.2023-09 11:33Emeryville, CA2017 Lexus RX 450hADSPickup TruckNo Injuries Reported0Highway / Freeway
Subject vehicle was on a testing mission in Emeryville, CA. The vehicle was traveling Westbound on [XXX] operated by the vehicle's Automated Driving System and supervised by a safety driver in the driver's designated sea…Subject vehicle was on a testing mission in Emeryville, CA. The vehicle was traveling Westbound on [XXX] operated by the vehicle's Automated Driving System and supervised by a safety driver in the driver's designated seating position, and with a safety operator in the front passenger seating position. Subject vehicle decelerated and came to a complete stop in response to traffic. Approximately three seconds later, with traffic remaining stopped ahead, a white Chevrolet Silverado made contact from the rear. Almost simultaneous with the crash, the safety driver disengaged the Automated Driving System through brake pedal force. After the crash, both vehicles proceeded to the side of the road to exchange information, and then took the closest exit to a nearby parking lot. Subject vehicle was towed given damage to the rear window. No injuries were reported, and law enforcement was not called to the scene. In addition to telematics and video, we have photographs of the damaged vehicles.
30610-6373ADSZoox, Inc.2023-09 15:20San Francisco, CA2017 Toyota HighlanderADSVanNo Injuries Reported0Street
A Zoox vehicle in autonomy was slowing to a gradual stop on eastbound [XXX] for a red light at [XXX] when it was rear-ended by vehicle 2 at approximately 10 mph. There was minor damage, no reported injuries, and police w…A Zoox vehicle in autonomy was slowing to a gradual stop on eastbound [XXX] for a red light at [XXX] when it was rear-ended by vehicle 2 at approximately 10 mph. There was minor damage, no reported injuries, and police were not called.
30711-6431ADSPony.ai2023-09 17:02Milpitas, CA2019 Lincoln MKZADSOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries Reported58Highway / Freeway
On September [XXX], 2023, preparing to enter the [XXX] while traveling northbound on the [XXX] in Milpitas, California, a Pony.ai autonomous vehicle ("AV") collided with road debris while operating in supervised autonomo…On September [XXX], 2023, preparing to enter the [XXX] while traveling northbound on the [XXX] in Milpitas, California, a Pony.ai autonomous vehicle ("AV") collided with road debris while operating in supervised autonomous ("Drivered") mode. Immediately prior to the incident, the AV safety driver noticed a flat item in the center part of the AV's lane of travel. The AV safety driver disengaged from autonomous mode and attempted to dodge the debris. However, the debris made contact with the rear bumper, slightly damaging it. Following the collision, the AV safety driver promptly drove the AV to Pony.ai's Fremont facility. There were no injuries reported.
30792-6492ADSWeRide Corp2023-09 13:54San Francisco, CA2023 Nissan LeafADSSUVNo Injuries Reported0Street
At 1:54pm, a WeRide vehicle (Car 1) was stopped on [XXX] left turning lane to [XXX]. As our vehicle (Car 1) was stopped for red traffic light, the toyota suv (Car 2) approaching from behind collided with our vehicle (Car…At 1:54pm, a WeRide vehicle (Car 1) was stopped on [XXX] left turning lane to [XXX]. As our vehicle (Car 1) was stopped for red traffic light, the toyota suv (Car 2) approaching from behind collided with our vehicle (Car 1). Both parties pulled over both involved vehicles and cooperated to exchange information. The damage sustained to the WeRide vehicle (Car 1) and toyota suv (Car 2) are minor.
33495-6725ADSApollo Autonomous Driving USA2023-09 12:25San Francisco, CA2017 Lincoln MKZ HybridUnknown, see NarrativeSUVNo Injuries Reported5Street
An Apollo autonomous vehicle ("AV") was traveling westbound on [XXX] in San Francisco in autonomous mode and stopped for a double-parked vehicle near [XXX]. An Apollo safety operator disengaged the AV from autonomous mod…An Apollo autonomous vehicle ("AV") was traveling westbound on [XXX] in San Francisco in autonomous mode and stopped for a double-parked vehicle near [XXX]. An Apollo safety operator disengaged the AV from autonomous mode into conventional mode with use of the steering wheel. Then the AV side-swiped the double-parked vehicle while in conventional mode. There were no injuries, and emergency services were not needed. Both the AV and the second vehicle sustained minor damage.
540-6451ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-09 22:16San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Street
On October 12, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the…On October 12, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-6436-1)
540-6453ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-09 17:32San Francisco, CA2022 Cruise AVADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported0Street
On .October 12, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactu…On .October 12, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-6438-1)
540-6462ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-09 23:56San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported10Intersection
On October 12, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactur…On October 12, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-6442-1).
540-6470ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-09 09:37San Francisco, CA2020 Cruise 8AVADSVanNo Injuries Reported10Street
On October 12, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactur…On October 12, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-6446-1).
540-6472ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-09 08:42San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported3Intersection
On October 12, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactur…On October 12, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-6447-1)
30270-6336ADSWaymo LLC2023-08 22:10San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSSUVMinor0Street
On August [XXX], 2023 at 10:09 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped at a red light on eastb…On August [XXX], 2023 at 10:09 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped at a red light on eastbound [XXX] at [XXX]. Shortly after the traffic light turned green and the Waymo AV began to proceed forward, the Waymo AV slowed to a stop. The SUV that was traveling closely behind the Waymo AV made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage, and the trailing SUV left the scene without exchanging information. A passenger in the Waymo AV reported injuries. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-6339ADSWaymo LLC2023-08 19:38Los Angeles, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries Reported7Street
On August [XXX], 2023 at 7:38 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Los Angeles, California was in a collision involving a recycling bin on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was pulling over to the right…On August [XXX], 2023 at 7:38 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Los Angeles, California was in a collision involving a recycling bin on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was pulling over to the right side of the road, when the test driver transitioned to manual mode and made contact with a recycling bin on the right side of the street. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was not engaged and a test driver was operating the Waymo AV in manual mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-6340ADSWaymo LLC2023-08 21:01San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported13Intersection
On August [XXX], 2023 at 9:01 PM a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southwestbound …On August [XXX], 2023 at 9:01 PM a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southwestbound on [XXX] in the second lane from the left as it was approaching [XXX]. As the Waymo AV was proceeding straight through the intersection, the passenger car in the right adjacent lane made a left turn from a straight-only lane onto southeastbound [XXX]. The rear of the passenger car made contact with the front of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was not engaged and a test driver was operating the Waymo AV in manual mode. Both the Waymo AV and the passenger car sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-6341ADSWaymo LLC2023-08 18:11San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries Reported0Street
On August [XXX], 2023, Waymo received notice of an allegation that a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") contributed to a low-speed collision between a fire engine and an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. On August [XXX], 2023…On August [XXX], 2023, Waymo received notice of an allegation that a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") contributed to a low-speed collision between a fire engine and an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. On August [XXX], 2023 at 6:11 PM PT, a Waymo AV operating in San Francisco, California was stopped at a red light in the dedicated left turn lane on the left side of northeast-bound [XXX] at the intersection with [XXX]. While the light was red, a fire engine approached the Waymo AV from behind and the Waymo AV moved forward as far as possible before entering the intersection at [XXX]. After the light turned green and as the Waymo AV was calculating a path into the intersection to clear the way, the fire engine maneuvered around the Waymo AV on the right side. During this maneuver, the right side of the fire engine appears to have made contact with the front left corner of an SUV that was stopped in the through lane to the right of the Waymo AV. The fire engine then proceeded through the intersection, and shortly afterwards, another fire engine and a fire department SUV passed on the left side the Waymo AV of the stopped Waymo AV. The Waymo AV then proceeded through the intersection. At the time of the collision, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The SUV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-6342ADSWaymo LLC2023-08 13:05San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSSUVNo Injuries Reported17Street
On August [XXX], 2023 at 1:05 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling northbound on [XXX]…On August [XXX], 2023 at 1:05 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling northbound on [XXX]. As the SUV was passing the Waymo AV to the left, it initiated a right lane change. The front of the SUV made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage, and the SUV left the scene without exchanging information. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-6343ADSWaymo LLC2023-08 16:45San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Street
On August [XXX], 2023 at 4:45 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV entered the slip lane which…On August [XXX], 2023 at 4:45 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV entered the slip lane which connects westbound [XXX] to northbound [XXX] and came to a stop to yield to cross-traffic on [XXX]. As the Waymo AV was stopped, the front of the passenger car which was traveling behind the Waymo AV made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the driver's seating position). The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-6344ADSWaymo LLC2023-08 17:48San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSNon-Motorist: CyclistNo Injuries Reported0Street
On August [XXX], 2023 at 5:49 PM PT the mirror of a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, CA was struck by a cyclist on [XXX]. Drive at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped in traffic on eastbound…On August [XXX], 2023 at 5:49 PM PT the mirror of a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, CA was struck by a cyclist on [XXX]. Drive at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped in traffic on eastbound [XXX] Drive at the intersection with [XXX], when a cyclist that had been traveling behind the Waymo AV passed the Waymo AV on the left. As the cyclist passed the Waymo AV, the cyclist made contact with the driver side mirror of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the driver's seating position). The Waymo AV sustained damage and the cyclist did not stop, leaving the scene without exchanging information. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-6346ADSWaymo LLC2023-08 21:55San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported0Street
On August [XXX], 2023 at 9:54 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a heavy truck on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling northbound on […On August [XXX], 2023 at 9:54 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a heavy truck on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling northbound on [XXX] when it approached a heavy truck and trailer that was stopped in the adjacent lane on the left side of the street. As the Waymo began to slowly pass the truck, the truck initiated a reversing turn maneuver into a loading bay on the left side of [XXX]. The Waymo AV then came to a stop, and as the Waymo AV was initiating its own reversing maneuver to clear the path for the truck, the right side of the trailer made contact with the front driver's side corner of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-6347ADSWaymo LLC2023-08 16:38Santa Monica, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported1Traffic Circle
On August [XXX], 2023 at 4:39 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Santa Monica, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traversing a roundabout…On August [XXX], 2023 at 4:39 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Santa Monica, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traversing a roundabout at the intersection of [XXX] at [XXX] when it slowed to a stop for other vehicles approaching and in the roundabout. The front of the passenger car that was in the roundabout behind the Waymo AV made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30412-6020ADSCruise LLC2023-08 09:48San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSSUVNo Injuries Reported5StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-6051ADSCruise LLC2023-08 11:03San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported0IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-6052ADSCruise LLC2023-08 11:41San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported0StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-6139ADSCruise LLC2023-08 07:51San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPickup TruckNo Injuries Reported8StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-6144 v3ADSCruise LLC2023-08 22:22San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSFirst Responder VehicleSerious13IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-6145 v2ADSCruise LLC2023-08 08:45San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSNon-Motorist: CyclistMinor1IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-6158ADSCruise LLC2023-08 00:12San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSVanNo Injuries Reported0IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-6159 v2ADSCruise LLC2023-08 00:19San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarModerate0IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-6160 v2ADSCruise LLC2023-08 00:56San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported13IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-6167 v2ADSCruise LLC2023-08 09:05San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarMinor5StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-6175 v2ADSCruise LLC2023-08 01:42San Francisco, CA2022 Cruise AVADSNon-Motorist: PedestrianModerate1IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-6180 v2ADSCruise LLC2023-08 21:22San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported2Intersection
A Cruise autonomous vehicle ("AV"), operating in driverless autonomous mode, was traveling southbound on [XXX] in the middle lane between [XXX] and [XXX]. At the same time, a backhoe loader was traveling behind and to th…A Cruise autonomous vehicle ("AV"), operating in driverless autonomous mode, was traveling southbound on [XXX] in the middle lane between [XXX] and [XXX]. At the same time, a backhoe loader was traveling behind and to the left of the AV. As the AV approached the intersection with [XXX], the AV began changing lanes into the left lane in front of the backhoe loader. The AV then braked and was hit from behind by the backhoe loader. This caused damage to the AV's rear bumper fascia, rear hatch and glass, rear driver side quarter panel and rear driver side door. Police were called to the scene. The parties exchanged information. There were no reported injuries and the AV was towed from the scene.
30412-6181ADSCruise LLC2023-08 01:39San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSSUVNo Injuries Reported0IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-6268ADSCruise LLC2023-08 20:33San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported8IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-6269ADSCruise LLC2023-08 13:47San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported5IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-6270ADSCruise LLC2023-08 16:06San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarMinor1IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-6271ADSCruise LLC2023-08 14:53San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPickup TruckNo Injuries Reported0IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-6272ADSCruise LLC2023-08 23:34San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSSUVNo Injuries Reported0IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-6275ADSCruise LLC2023-08 22:32San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported0StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-6276ADSCruise LLC2023-08 10:37San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported0IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-6277ADSCruise LLC2023-08 08:37San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported0StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-6278ADSCruise LLC2023-08 16:45San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPickup TruckNo Injuries Reported0StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-6279ADSCruise LLC2023-08 11:59San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported1IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-6280ADSCruise LLC2023-08 22:55San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported6IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-6281ADSCruise LLC2023-08 16:31San Francisco, CA2022 Cruise AVADSPickup TruckNo Injuries Reported1StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-6282ADSCruise LLC2023-08 04:53San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSSUVNo Injuries Reported7IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30450-6116ADSGhost Autonomy Inc.2023-08 14:20Sunol, CA2017 Toyota CamryUnknown, see NarrativeOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries Reported55Highway / Freeway
A Ghost autonomous vehicle was hit by crash debris while traveling on [XXX]. The Ghost vehicle neither hit nor was hit by another vehicle. The Ghost car was traveling in AV mode with two safety drivers. Traffic slowed…A Ghost autonomous vehicle was hit by crash debris while traveling on [XXX]. The Ghost vehicle neither hit nor was hit by another vehicle. The Ghost car was traveling in AV mode with two safety drivers. Traffic slowed quickly, apparently due to a crash ahead of the Ghost car. Consistent with their training, the Ghost driver took control of the car by manually braking and disengaging the autonomous system. The car was traveling 55.3 mph when the driver began to brake. The Ghost car stopped without impacting the preceding car. A Mercedes car immediately following the Ghost car also came to a stop without impacting the Ghost car. Ghost's understanding based on communications at the scene is that a Grand Cherokee traveling behind the Mercedes tried to swerve to avoid impacting the Mercedes but clipped the Mercedes and rolled over. To Ghost's knowledge, nobody in the Grand Cherokee was injured. The Ghost drivers heard a noise and then found that the rear bumper of the Ghost car had been damaged, which Ghost believes resulted from crash debris. The Ghost drivers drove the Ghost car back to the garage in conventional mode.
30490-6359ADSBeep, Inc.2023-08 17:54San Francisco, CANavya Arma Autonom DLADSPassenger CarNo Injuries ReportedIntersection
VIN # VG9A2CB2CIV[XXX] At approximately 5:54 p.m. on Wednesday, August [XXX], 2023, P84, travelling eastbound on [XXX], approached the three-way stop at [XXX] and [XXX]. P84 arrived at the intersection at the same time …VIN # VG9A2CB2CIV[XXX] At approximately 5:54 p.m. on Wednesday, August [XXX], 2023, P84, travelling eastbound on [XXX], approached the three-way stop at [XXX] and [XXX]. P84 arrived at the intersection at the same time as two other vehicles: a grey van heading northbound on [XXX] and a red sedan heading westbound on [XXX]. The safety driver yielded to the northbound vehicle, which proceeded to make a right-hand turn eastbound onto [XXX]. After allowing the intersection to clear, the safety driver onboard P84 confirmed that it was safe for the shuttle to proceed through the intersection. As the shuttle entered the intersection, a second vehicle travelling northbound on [XXX], a white sedan, entered the intersection intending a left-hand turn onto westbound [XXX]. Both vehicles entered the intersection simultaneously, subsequently colliding at a low rate of speed in the middle of the intersection. At approximately 5:57 p.m., the Beep Command Center (BCC) was informed by the safety driver that P84 was involved in a minor collision with another vehicle at the intersection of [XXX] and [XXX]. The incident response protocol was initiated, and a supervisor dispatched to the scene. Local law enforcement (San Francisco Police Department) was contacted to report the collision but declined to respond given the minor nature of the collision, directing both parties to exchange information. After the Beep supervisor arrived on scene at approximately 6:49 p.m., the safety driver and supervisor removed the shuttle from the roadway and exchanged insurance information with the driver of the other vehicle. Damage to both vehicles was noted to be very minor. The shuttle sustained light scuffs, chips, and small paint transfer. The other vehicle sustained a small dent on the fender. Neither vehicle required towing, and both were safely driven from the scene. Beeps safety driver was subsequently subjected to a standard post-collision drug & alcohol screening which has since cleared. Contributing Factors Based on an analysis of the available evidence, Beep has determined the following factors may have contributed to the higher likelihood of a collision occurring in this instance: 1.The white sedan failed to yield to P84 in accordance with California state law governing intersection priority. 2.The slight bend in P84s path to accommodate the lane shift through the intersection may have reduced the available stopping distance as the white sedan was not perceived as an obstacle in P84s path until it proceeded further into the intersection. Incident Findings Beep developed the following findings regarding this incident: 1.P84 behaved as expected, detecting and maintaining awareness of the white sedan in the moments preceding the collision, commanding hard braking maneuver, and achieving a 3m/s2 deceleration rate once the white sedan encroached on P84s path. 2.The safety driver observed California state law and had the right of way when releasing P84 into the intersection. 3.The safety driver could have avoided the collision by using the emergency stop. The safety driver indicated that they were aware of the other vehicle through the duration of the incident and were aware of the proper procedure in this scenario but panicked in the moment. Mitigation: Implement a priority zone to account for the slight bend in the shuttles path and for future vehicles that may fail to yield.
30792-6114ADSWeRide Corp2023-08 13:45San Francisco, CA2023 Nissan LEAFUnknown, see NarrativePickup TruckNo Injuries Reported0Street
At 1:45pm, a WeRide vehicle (Car 1) was parked at a [XXX] parking meter - between [XXX] and [XXX] when another vehicle (Car 2) began reversing in front of the vehicle in question. The reversing vehicle (Car 2) ultimatel…At 1:45pm, a WeRide vehicle (Car 1) was parked at a [XXX] parking meter - between [XXX] and [XXX] when another vehicle (Car 2) began reversing in front of the vehicle in question. The reversing vehicle (Car 2) ultimately collided with the front left corner of the WeRide vehicle (Car 1), causing minor damage to the front bumper. The reversing vehicle (Car 2) did not have any damage. Both drivers were able to confer with one another seconds after the incident took place. The reversing vehicle's driver did not possess any form of insurance or registration. WeRide vehicle (Car 1) ADS was not engaged.
540-6036ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-08 09:48San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSSUVNo Injuries Reported5Street
On August 7, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured…On August 7, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-6020-1).
540-6056ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-08 11:41San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported0Street
On August 11 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured…On August 11 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-6052-1)
540-6057ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-08 11:03San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On August 11, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufacture…On August 11, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-6051-1).
540-6148 v3ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-08 22:22San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSFirst Responder VehicleSerious13Intersection
On September 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an update Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) m…On September 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an update Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-6144-3).
540-6151 v2ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-08 08:45San Frabcisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSNon-Motorist: CyclistMinor1Intersection
On August 25, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed a 10 Day Update Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM…On August 25, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed a 10 Day Update Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-6145-2)
540-6152ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-08 07:51San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPickup TruckNo Injuries Reported8Street
On August 18, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufacture…On August 18, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-6139-1)
540-6161ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-08 00:12San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSVanNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On August 22, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufacture…On August 22, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-6158-1)
540-6162 v2ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-08 00:19San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarModerate0Intersection
On September 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an update Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) m…On September 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an update Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-6159-2)
540-6163 v2ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-08 00:56San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported13Intersection
On September 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an updated Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) …On September 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an updated Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-6160-2)
540-6178 v2ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-08 01:42San Francisco, CA2022 Cruise AVADSNon-Motorist: PedestrianModerate1Intersection
On September 5, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed a 10 Day Update Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (…On September 5, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed a 10 Day Update Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-6175-2).
540-6189 v2ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-08 21:22San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported2Intersection
On September 26, 2024, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an updated Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) …On September 26, 2024, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an updated Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-6180-2)
540-6190ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-08 01:39San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSSUVNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On August 29, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufacture…On August 29, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-6181-1)
540-6293 v2ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-08 14:53San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPickup TruckNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On September 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufact…On September 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-6271-1)
540-6294 v2ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-08 16:06San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarMinor1Intersection
On September 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufact…On September 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-6270-1)
540-6295ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-08 20:33San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported8Intersection
On September 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufact…On September 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-6268-1)
540-6302ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-08 13:47San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported5Intersection
On September 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufact…On September 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-6269-1)
540-6304 v2ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-08 09:05San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarMinor5Street
On October 13, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Updated Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) ma…On October 13, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Updated Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-6167-2)
540-6306ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-08 22:32San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported0Street
On September 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufact…On September 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-6275-1)
540-6307ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-08 23:34San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSSUVNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On September 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufact…On September 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-6272-1)
540-6308ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-08 10:37San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On September 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufact…On September 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-6276-1)
540-6311ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-08 11:59San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported1Intersection
On September 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufact…On September 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-6279-1)
540-6313ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-08 16:45San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPickup TruckNo Injuries Reported0Street
On September 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufact…On September 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-6278-1)
540-6315ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-08 22:55San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported6Intersection
On September 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufact…On September 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-6280-1)
540-6316ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-08 16:31San Francisco, CA2022 Cruise AVADSPickup TruckNo Injuries Reported1Street
On September 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufact…On September 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-6281-1)
540-6317ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-08 08:37San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported0Street
On September 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufact…On September 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-6277-1)
540-6318ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-08 04:53San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSSUVNo Injuries Reported7Intersection
On September 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufact…On September 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order") General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-6282-1)
855-6288ADSMercedes-Benz USA, LLC2023-08 13:40Los Angeles, CA2021 Mercedes-Benz S 580 4MaticADSVanMinor0Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30270-5855 v2ADSWaymo LLC2023-07 15:08Los Angeles, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSNon-Motorist: CyclistNo Injuries Reported2Intersection
The content of this report is unchanged from the initial report submitted on July 10, 2023 [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION]. On July [XXX], 2023 at 3:08 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo A…The content of this report is unchanged from the initial report submitted on July 10, 2023 [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION]. On July [XXX], 2023 at 3:08 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Los Angeles, California was in a collision involving a cyclist on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX] and preparing to make a right turn onto westbound [XXX]. As the Waymo AV was yielding to cross-traffic and preparing to make a right turn, a cyclist was traveling eastbound on [XXX] and heading the wrong way in the bike lane. The cyclist then turned left, northbound, onto [XXX], continuing to travel the wrong direction in the bike lane. As the Waymo AV slowly proceeded forward, the cyclist passed the Waymo AV and made contact with the rear passenger side sensor of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the drivers seating position). The Waymo AV sustained damage and the cyclist did not stop, leaving the scene without exchanging information. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a cyclist was involved. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-5998ADSWaymo LLC2023-07 15:04San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPickup TruckNo Injuries Reported9Intersection
On July [XXX], 2023 at 3:04 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a pickup truck on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was parallel parked along the cu…On July [XXX], 2023 at 3:04 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a pickup truck on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was parallel parked along the curb on eastbound [XXX] at [XXX] when it began to pull away from the curb and into traffic. As the Waymo AV pulled away from the curb, a pickup truck that was traveling behind the Waymo AV then made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the drivers seating position). Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-6129ADSWaymo LLC2023-07 13:13San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported4Street
On July [XXX], 2023 at 1:13 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XX…On July [XXX], 2023 at 1:13 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX] in autonomous mode when it began to brake as it approached a stopped van on the oncoming side of the narrow roadway. The Waymo AV test driver transitioned to manual mode and began proceeding straight when the passenger side front sensor housing of the Waymo AV made contact with the driver side mirror of a passenger car parked along the curb on southbound [XXX]. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was not engaged and a test driver was operating the Waymo AV in manual mode. Both the Waymo AV and the passenger car sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-6130ADSWaymo LLC2023-07 10:13San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSSUVNo Injuries Reported1Intersection
On July [XXX], 2023 at 10:13 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. While completing a right turn from [XXX] onto [XXX] i…On July [XXX], 2023 at 10:13 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. While completing a right turn from [XXX] onto [XXX] in autonomous mode, the Waymo AV slowed to a stop while entering a narrow roadway. The test driver transitioned the vehicle to manual mode and proceeded forward, making contact with a parked SUV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was not engaged and a test driver was operating the Waymo AV in manual mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-6132ADSWaymo LLC2023-07 9:51San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On July [XXX], 2023 at 9:51 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The collision occurred while the Waymo AV w…On July [XXX], 2023 at 9:51 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The collision occurred while the Waymo AV was stopped in the leftmost lane of a two-lane, one-way road at the intersection of [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was facing a green light, but stopped before entering the intersection because traffic was stacked on the other side of the intersection, leaving no space for the AV. When the light turned yellow, a passenger car that had been stopped behind the Waymo AV passed the Waymo AV on the left and proceeded into the intersection. While passing the Waymo AV, the passenger cars rear passenger side door made contact with the driver side rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The passenger car did not stop but appears to have sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-6133ADSWaymo LLC2023-07 11:11San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSSUVNo Injuries Reported0Street
On July [XXX], 2023 at 11:11 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] east of [XXX]. The Waymo AV was facing east, waiting to merge t…On July [XXX], 2023 at 11:11 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] east of [XXX]. The Waymo AV was facing east, waiting to merge to the left back into eastbound traffic on [XXX], and stopped to the left of the right turn slip lane on [XXX], with stopped traffic to the right. After waiting to merge, the Waymo AV started reversing to reroute and while doing so, a sensor on the right front of the Waymo AV made contact with the left rear side of an SUV in the right turn lane. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The SUV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-6134ADSWaymo LLC2023-07 14:57Santa Monica, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSNon-Motorist: CyclistNo Injuries Reported0Street
On July [XXX], 2023 at 2:57 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Santa Monica, California was in a collision involving a cyclist on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped in traffic on southwestbo…On July [XXX], 2023 at 2:57 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Santa Monica, California was in a collision involving a cyclist on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped in traffic on southwestbound [XXX] when a cyclist that had been traveling behind the Waymo AV passed the Waymo AV on the right. As the cyclist passed the Waymo AV, the cyclist made contact with the front passenger side sensor of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the drivers seating position). The Waymo AV sustained damage and the cyclist did not stop, leaving the scene without exchanging information. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30412-5848ADSCruise LLC2023-07 22:47San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPickup TruckNo Injuries Reported4StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-5968ADSCruise LLC2023-07 23:08San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSSUVMinor15IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-5981ADSCruise LLC2023-07 01:56San Francisco, CA2022 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-5982 v2ADSCruise LLC2023-07 06:41San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarUnknown0IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information

What this table is and is not. Rows are the operators' own filings, not verified cases, and a filing does not establish fault. NHTSA redacts most Level 2 narratives as confidential business information, so the text column is empty for most Tesla rows; the structured columns are not redacted. When one crash is filed by several entities, an operator and the fleet owner for example, NHTSA gives the filings one same_incident_id; the "one row per incident" view collapses them into a single row at the highest severity any filer alleged, with the count of filings and every report number beside it, so a count of incidents or deaths is not inflated by duplicate filings. The table joins NHTSA's current files (incidents from June 2025, after the third amended order) with its 2021-2025 archive, which used an older layout: severity labels, roadway and weather fields differ between the two sets, and the source_set column in the CSV says which one a row came from. Level 2 reports are shown here because the file contains them, but they are not cases in the register, which counts a vehicle as a robot only when nobody inside is responsible for driving. Source: NHTSA SGO 2021-01. On 7 November 2026 we filed a public comment built on this table in the California Public Utilities Commission's Rulemaking R.12-12-011, asking for machine-readable mileage files and a crosswalk between the Commission's incident categories and the SGO definitions. The themed reading of the driverless narratives is on the reports page.