The MachineRecord
NHTSA Standing General Order 2021-01

The SGO file, in a form you can search

NHTSA publishes the crash reports as three CSV files of 116 columns each, with several versions of the same report mixed in. This is the same data as one table: driverless systems (ADS) and Level 2 driver assistance side by side, 2021 to today including NHTSA's archive, one row per report at its latest version, every row traceable to its NHTSA report number. Free, CC BY 4.0, refreshed from NHTSA on every pipeline run.

Reports
8612
Fatal
87
Of them Level 2
79
Reporting entities
64
Incidents
2019-08 to 2026-09
Clear filters

443 reports, showing 301 to 400.

Report IDCaseProgramEntityIncidentPlaceVehicleEngagedCrash withSeveritySpeed, mphRoadwayNarrative
540-5940ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-06 09:36San Francisco, CA2022 Cruise AVADSOther, see NarrativeUnknown7Street
On July 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured…On July 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-5782-1)
540-5941ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-06 22:37San Francisco, CA2022 Cruise AVADSSUVNo Injuries Reported0Street
On July 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured…On July 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-5828-1)
540-5942ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-06 23:30San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries Reported1Street
On July 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured…On July 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-5831-1)
540-5948ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-06 00:50San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported1Street
On July 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured…On July 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-5832-1)
540-5950ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-06 23:08San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported6Street
On July 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured…On July 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-5833-1)
540-5951ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-06 21:04Austin, TX2023 Cruise AVADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported0Street
On July 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured…On July 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-5836-1)
669-5837ADSHyundai Motor America2023-06 21:42Las Vegas, NV2021 Hyundai IONIQ 5ADSPassenger CarMinor3Intersection
On June 23, 2023, Motional informed HMNA's NASO of a crash incident occurring on June [XXX], 2023, at 9:42 PM PDT, involving a Hyundai IONIQ 5 test vehicle operating in proprietary ADS autonomous mode with a safety drive…On June 23, 2023, Motional informed HMNA's NASO of a crash incident occurring on June [XXX], 2023, at 9:42 PM PDT, involving a Hyundai IONIQ 5 test vehicle operating in proprietary ADS autonomous mode with a safety driver at the wheel and a safety operator in the front passenger seat. According to Motional, the test vehicle was travelling northbound in the left-most of two left turn lanes on a local road at approximately 10 mph. The test vehicle then braked for an approaching taxi in the adjacent lane that appeared to be crossing into the Motional test vehicle's lane and was rear-ended by a silver Toyota from behind. The Toyota vehicle fled the scene of the accident. Hyundai understands that the equipment and software used during the test is proprietary to Motional and not used as OEM equipment in any Hyundai/Genesis vehicle produced for sale to the general public. Hyundai currently does not offer an ADS feature on any vehicle offered for sale in the U.S. market.
30270-5429 v2ADSWaymo LLC2023-05 10:32San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSSUVNo Injuries Reported4Street
The content of this report is unchanged from the initial report submitted on May 4, 2023 [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION]. On May [XXX], 2023 at 10:32 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV…The content of this report is unchanged from the initial report submitted on May 4, 2023 [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION]. On May [XXX], 2023 at 10:32 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling in autonomous mode in the middle lane on westbound [XXX] between [XXX] and [XXX]. A slower traveling van in the left adjacent lane began to initiate a right lane change in front of the Waymo AV, and the Waymo AV test driver transitioned to manual mode and braked. The SUV traveling behind the Waymo AV then made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was not engaged and a test driver was operating the Waymo AV in manual mode. The Waymo AV and SUV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away and because of airbag deployment. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-5456 v2ADSWaymo LLC2023-05 15:27San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSNon-Motorist: CyclistNo Injuries Reported0Street
Other than a correction to the reported mileage, the content of this report is unchanged from the initial report submitted on May 8, 2023 [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION]. On May [XXX], 2023 at …Other than a correction to the reported mileage, the content of this report is unchanged from the initial report submitted on May 8, 2023 [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION]. On May [XXX], 2023 at 3:27 PM PDT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a cyclist on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling westbound in the left lane on [XXX] and had just passed [XXX] when it detected an oncoming pickup truck traveling eastbound in the Waymo AVs lane. The Waymo AV stopped and the pickup truck re-entered the correct lane for eastbound traffic and passed the Waymo AV. The pickup truck was immediately followed by a large group of cyclists traveling eastbound in multiple lanes of the roadway, including the right lanes and on the wrong side of the double-yellow centerline. The Waymo AV remained stopped as the oncoming cyclists rode around both sides of the Waymo AV. One cyclist then made contact with the front of the stationary Waymo AV, and then immediately left the scene. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vulnerable road user was involved. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-5611ADSWaymo LLC2023-05 17:54Phoenix, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries Reported10Parking Lot
On May [XXX], 2023 at 5:54 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona made contact with an asphalt speed bump in a parking lot at [XXX]. The Waymo AV entered the parking lot and the Waymo A…On May [XXX], 2023 at 5:54 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona made contact with an asphalt speed bump in a parking lot at [XXX]. The Waymo AV entered the parking lot and the Waymo AVs undercarriage then made contact with a speed bump (the AV did not contact any vehicle or other road user). At the time of the contact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained undercarriage damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-5612ADSWaymo LLC2023-05 17:34Phoenix, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries Reported8Parking Lot
On May [XXX], 2023 at 5:34 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona made contact with an asphalt speed bump in a parking lot at [XXX]. The Waymo AV entered the parking lot and the Waymo A…On May [XXX], 2023 at 5:34 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona made contact with an asphalt speed bump in a parking lot at [XXX]. The Waymo AV entered the parking lot and the Waymo AVs undercarriage then made contact with a speed bump (the AV did not contact any vehicle or other road user). At the time of the contact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained undercarriage damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-5756ADSWaymo LLC2023-05 13:37Phoenix, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported32Street
On [XXX], 2023 at 1:37 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle on [XXX] at S [XXX]. While traveling eastbound on [XXX], a passenger vehi…On [XXX], 2023 at 1:37 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle on [XXX] at S [XXX]. While traveling eastbound on [XXX], a passenger vehicle in the oncoming lane veered out of their lane and into the eastbound lane. The vehicle made contact with the left rear door of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The other party immediately left the scene without exchanging information. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-5757ADSWaymo LLC2023-05 21:29Mesa, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries Reported63Highway / Freeway
On [XXX], 2023 at 9:29 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Mesa, Arizona was in a collision involving an object on the [XXX], East of [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling eastbound in the far right lane…On [XXX], 2023 at 9:29 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Mesa, Arizona was in a collision involving an object on the [XXX], East of [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling eastbound in the far right lane on a three-lane stretch of the [XXX] when a load of hay bales fell off a truck traveling in the center lane ahead of the Waymo AV. The front left fender of the Waymo AV made contact with a hay bale. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the drivers seating position). The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-5758ADSWaymo LLC2023-05 20:48San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported6Street
On[XXX], 2023 at 8:48 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle on [XXX] at [XXX}. While traveling west on [XXX}, the Waymo AV was…On[XXX], 2023 at 8:48 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle on [XXX] at [XXX}. While traveling west on [XXX}, the Waymo AV was executing a pullover maneuver in autonomous mode and made contact with the left rear bumper of a parked vehicle. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-5759ADSWaymo LLC2023-05 23:30Tempe, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On [XXX], 2023 at 11:30 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped at a red light at the intersect…On [XXX], 2023 at 11:30 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped at a red light at the intersection of [XXX] at [XXX]. A passenger vehicle that had been previously stopped behind the Waymo AV proceeded forward, making contact with the rear bumper of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the drivers seating position). The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-5760ADSWaymo LLC2023-05 09:42Phoenix, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported0Street
On [XXX], 2023 at 09:42 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a heavy truck on [XXX], just west of [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling westbound on [XXX] whe…On [XXX], 2023 at 09:42 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a heavy truck on [XXX], just west of [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling westbound on [XXX] when it came to a stop, yielding to a U-Haul box truck that was attempting to reverse into a parking lot to the right of the Waymo AV. The truck exited the lot and re-entered the oncoming eastbound lane, making contact with the left front end of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-5762ADSWaymo LLC2023-05 10:56San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSAnimalNo Injuries Reported23Street
On [XXX] at 10:56 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a small dog on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southwest on [XXX] when a small …On [XXX] at 10:56 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a small dog on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southwest on [XXX] when a small dog ran into the street in front of the Waymo AV. The Waymo AV then made contact with the dog, which did not survive. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the drivers seating position). The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30412-5422 v3ADSCruise LLC2023-05 02:44San Francisco, CA2022 Cruise AVADSOther Fixed ObjectMinor7IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-5430 v2ADSCruise LLC2023-05 09:32San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSOther, see NarrativeMinor5IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-5624ADSCruise LLC2023-05 21:24San Francisco, CA2022 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarMinor15StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-5697ADSCruise LLC2023-05 03:34San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported9StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-5708ADSCruise LLC2023-05 00:35Austin, TX2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-5709ADSCruise LLC2023-05 00:35Austin, TX2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported8StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-5710ADSCruise LLC2023-05 23:12Austin, TX2022 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-5711ADSCruise LLC2023-05 00:14Austin, TX2023 Cruise AVADSSUVNo Injuries Reported0StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30413-5633ADSMay Mobility2023-05 16:40Grand Rapids, MN2021 Toyota SiennaADSNon-Motorist: OtherNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On Tuesday May [XXX] at 16:40 local time, the May shuttle was driving Northbound from [XXX] to [XXX] in Grand Rapids, MN, in autonomous mode and was followed by 2 people riding on scooters. As the May shuttle made the tu…On Tuesday May [XXX] at 16:40 local time, the May shuttle was driving Northbound from [XXX] to [XXX] in Grand Rapids, MN, in autonomous mode and was followed by 2 people riding on scooters. As the May shuttle made the turn, the VRUs were traveling in the same direction as the May shuttle on opposite sides of the lane. As the May shuttle completed the turn at 10 MPH, the brakes were applied and the vehicle came to a complete stop because one of the riders attempted to cross over in the lane which caused VRU safety buffer to intersect with vehicle path, which led the vehicle to slow to a stop. The scooter rider contacted the rear left rear bumper of the shuttle. Scooters were traveling at an estimated speed of 12 mph and accelerating.
30531-5440 v2ADSTransdev Alternative Services2023-05 10:32San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSSUVNo Injuries Reported4Street
The content of this report is unchanged from the initial report. On May [XXX], 2023 at 10:32 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [X…The content of this report is unchanged from the initial report. On May [XXX], 2023 at 10:32 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was fraveling in autonomous mode in the middle lane on westbound [XXX] between [XXX] and [XXX]. A slower traveling van in the left adjacent lane began to initiate a right lane change in front of the Waymo AV, and the Waymo AV test driver transitioned to manual mode and braked. The SUV traveling behind the Waymo AV then made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was not engaged and a test driver was operating the Waymo AV in manual mode. The Waymo AV and SUV sustained damage. This is a duplicate of report 30270-5429-1.
30531-5768ADSTransdev Alternative Services2023-05 21:29Mesa, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries Reported63Highway / Freeway
On [XXX], 2023 at 9:29 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Mesa, Arizona was ina. collision involving an object on the [XXX], East of [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling eastbound in the far right la…On [XXX], 2023 at 9:29 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Mesa, Arizona was ina. collision involving an object on the [XXX], East of [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling eastbound in the far right lane on a three-lane stretch of the [XXX] when a load of hay bales fell off a truck traveling in the center lane ahead of the Waymo AV. The front left fender of the Waymo AV made contact with a hay bale. At the time of the impact, the Waymo WV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the driver's seating position). The Waymo AV sustained damage. Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General order 2021-01. Transdev may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This is a duplicate of NHTSA Report ID 30270-5757-1.
30531-5769ADSTransdev Alternative Services2023-05 23:30Tempe, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On [XXX] at 11:30 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle on [XXX] at [XXX] Parkway. The Waymo AV was stopped at a red light at the inter…On [XXX] at 11:30 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle on [XXX] at [XXX] Parkway. The Waymo AV was stopped at a red light at the intersection of [XXX] at [XXX] Parkway. A passenger vehicle that had been previously stopped behind the Waymo AV proceeded forward, making contact with the rear bumper of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the driver's seating position). The Waymo AV sustained damage. Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General order 2021-01. Transdev may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This is a duplicate of NHTSA Report ID: 30270-5759-1.
30531-5770ADSTransdev Alternative Services2023-05 10:56San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSAnimalNo Injuries Reported23Street
On [XXX], 2023 at 10:56 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a small dog on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southwest on [XXX] when …On [XXX], 2023 at 10:56 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a small dog on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southwest on [XXX] when a small dog ran into the street in front of the Waymo AV. The Waymo AV then made contact with the dog, which did not survive. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the driver's seating position). The Waymo AV sustained damage. Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Transdev may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This is a duplicate of NHTSA report ID 30270-5762-1.
30610-5714ADSZoox, Inc.2023-05 10:52Paradise, NV2016 Toyota HighlanderADSPassenger CarMinor0Street
A Zoox vehicle in autonomy was stopped in a merge lane, yielding and waiting for cross traffic, when it was rear ended at low speed by a vehicle behind. A Zoox operator reported "slight shoulder pain." Police were not c…A Zoox vehicle in autonomy was stopped in a merge lane, yielding and waiting for cross traffic, when it was rear ended at low speed by a vehicle behind. A Zoox operator reported "slight shoulder pain." Police were not called.
30610-5716ADSZoox, Inc.2023-05 11:40San Francisco, CA2017 Toyota HighlanderADSSUVMinor1Street
A Zoox vehicle in autonomy was coming to a gradual stop for traffic ahead when it was rear ended by vehicle 2 at low speed. There was minor damage to the striking vehicle and police were not called. A Zoox operator repor…A Zoox vehicle in autonomy was coming to a gradual stop for traffic ahead when it was rear ended by vehicle 2 at low speed. There was minor damage to the striking vehicle and police were not called. A Zoox operator reported "sore neck and back".
30792-5565ADSWeRide Corp2023-05 11:41San Francisco, CA2023 Nissan LeafADSNon-Motorist: CyclistNo Injuries Reported0Street
On Monday May [XXX] at 11:41am a Weride autonomous vehicle (Vehicle 1) was in Autonomous Mode stopped at the intersection of [XXX] towards [XXX] appropriately yielding to a illegally U turning skateboard on [XXX] North t…On Monday May [XXX] at 11:41am a Weride autonomous vehicle (Vehicle 1) was in Autonomous Mode stopped at the intersection of [XXX] towards [XXX] appropriately yielding to a illegally U turning skateboard on [XXX] North to South direction in front of the AV (Vehicle 1). While yielding, a bicyclist was coming from behind our AV (Vehicle 1) head was turned left possibly looking for cross traffic. When the cyclist turned his head forward, it was too late to react in time to our stopped vehicle(Vehicle 1) with the given distance and speed they were traveling at in which the cyclist collided with our vehicle (Vehicle 1). Our Weride safety officer immediately disengaged and hand signaled to the bicyclist to pull over to the closest safe place to park as to not obstruct traffic. As our safety officer parked and got out of the car to check on the bicyclist, the bicyclist was already on in motion on his bicycle and "fist bumped" our safety officer while passing by him and leaving the scene without exchanging any information.
540-5425 v3ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-05 02:44San Francisco, CA2022 Cruise AVADSOther Fixed ObjectMinor7Intersection
On May 12, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an updated Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Crui…On May 12, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an updated Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-5422-3)
540-5445 v2ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-05 09:32San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSOther, see NarrativeMinor5Intersection
On May 10, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed a 10-day updated Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured th…On May 10, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed a 10-day updated Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-5430-2)
540-5639ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-05 21:24San Drancisco, CA2022 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarMinor15Street
On May 26, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured …On May 26, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-5624-1)
540-5726ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-05 03:34San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported9Street
On June 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured…On June 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-5697-1)
540-5729ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-05 00:35Austin, TX2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Street
On June 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured…On June 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-5708-1)
540-5730ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-05 00:35Austin, TX2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported8Street
On June 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured…On June 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-5709-1)
540-5731ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-05 23:12Austin, TX2022 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Street
On June 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured…On June 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-5710-1)
540-5735ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-05 00:14Austin, TX2023 Cruise AVADSSUVNo Injuries Reported0Street
On June 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured…On June 14, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Second Amended Standing General Order 2021-01, dated April 5, 2023 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-5711-1)
30270-5202 v2ADSWaymo LLC2023-04 10:46San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
The content of this report is unchanged from the initial report submitted on April 6, 2023 [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION]. On April [XXX], 2023 at 10:46 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waym…The content of this report is unchanged from the initial report submitted on April 6, 2023 [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION]. On April [XXX], 2023 at 10:46 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX] in the leftmost lane as it was approaching the intersection with [XXX]. The signal for traffic proceeding south on [XXX] was green for the Waymo AV as it approached the intersection. As the Waymo AV approached, an individual riding a motorized scooter traveling north on [XXX] proceeded to turn left onto westbound [XXX], across the paths of the Waymo AV and other oncoming vehicles. The Waymo AV began to brake, and the Waymo AV test driver transitioned to manual mode and brought the Waymo AV to a stop. A passenger car traveling directly behind the Waymo AV then made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. The individual riding the scooter was not contacted by the Waymo AV or any other vehicle. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was not engaged and a test driver was operating the Waymo AV in manual mode. Both the Waymo AV and the passenger car sustained damage, and the individual on the motorized scooter left the scene. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a Vulnerable Road User was involved. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-5208 v2ADSWaymo LLC2023-04 10:48San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported0Street
The content of this report is unchanged from the initial report submitted on [XXX], 2023 [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION]. On April [XXX], 2023 at 10:48 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo …The content of this report is unchanged from the initial report submitted on [XXX], 2023 [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION]. On April [XXX], 2023 at 10:48 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a heavy truck on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was proceeding northwest on [XXX] near the intersection with [XXX] when it came to a stop to yield to a heavy truck traveling southeast on [XXX]. As the heavy truck drove past the Waymo AV, the drivers side section of the heavy truck made contact with the rear drivers side sensor of the Waymo AV. The heavy truck then left the scene. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-5584ADSWaymo LLC2023-04 22:56San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PACEADSSUVNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On April [XXX], 2023 at 10:56 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. While traveling northwest on [XXX], the Waymo AV ca…On April [XXX], 2023 at 10:56 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. While traveling northwest on [XXX], the Waymo AV came to a stop to yield to an oncoming SUV in a narrow passageway. The SUV proceeded around the Waymo AV and made contact with the left rear sensor housing of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the drivers seating position). The driver of the SUV stopped briefly but left before sharing their information. The Waymo sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-5586ADSWaymo LLC2023-04 17:29Santa Monica, CA2021 Jaguar I-PACEADSSUVNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On April [XXX], 2023 at 5:29 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Santa Monica, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southwest on [XXX] in th…On April [XXX], 2023 at 5:29 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Santa Monica, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southwest on [XXX] in the rightmost lane as it was approaching the intersection with [XXX]. The signal for traffic proceeding southwest on [XXX] was red as the Waymo AV approached the intersection and came to a stop. The signal for traffic proceeding southwest on [XXX] then turned green, and traffic in adjacent lanes began moving while the Waymo AV waited for traffic in its lane to begin to move. The SUV that had been stopped directly behind the Waymo AV began moving forward and the front of the SUV made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the drivers seating position). The Waymo sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-5588ADSWaymo LLC2023-04 15:43Tempe, AZ2017 Chrysler PacificaADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported5Intersection
On April [XXX], 2023 at 3:43 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX] in the …On April [XXX], 2023 at 3:43 PM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX] in the rightmost lane as it was approaching the intersection with [XXX]. After the Waymo AV entered the right-turn lane, a passenger car began to exit from the shopping center driveway to the right of the Waymo AV. The Waymo AV began to brake as the passenger car began to turn in front of the AV onto [XXX]. The passenger car's front bumper made contact with the front right corner of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV did not sustain damage the passenger car sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-5591ADSWaymo LLC2023-04 8:02Phoenix, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PACEADSVanNo Injuries Reported1Intersection
On April [XXX], 2023 at 8:02 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a van on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling northbound on [XXX] in the leftmost…On April [XXX], 2023 at 8:02 AM PT a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a van on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling northbound on [XXX] in the leftmost lane as it was approaching the intersection with [XXX]. The signal for traffic proceeding north on [XXX] was yellow as the Waymo AV approached the intersection. The Waymo AV slowed, preparing to stop, and a van traveling directly behind the Waymo AV then made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both the Waymo AV and the van sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-5592ADSWaymo LLC2023-04 17:29San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PACEADSSUVNo Injuries Reported0Street
On April [XXX], 2023 at 5:29 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling east on [XXX] between [XXX…On April [XXX], 2023 at 5:29 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling east on [XXX] between [XXX] and [XXX] when it approached an SUV that was stopped in the lane in front of the Waymo AV. The Waymo AV began passing the stopped SUV on the left when the SUV began reversing in the lane. The Waymo AV then stopped behind and to the left of the SUV, and the SUV continued reversing and began a turning maneuver to enter a parking space. The left side of the SUV made contact with the front right corner of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV was stopped and the AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-5593ADSWaymo LLC2023-04 13:53San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PACEADSSUVNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On April [XXX], 2023 at 1:53 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. While the Waymo AV was parked at the right side cu…On April [XXX], 2023 at 1:53 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. While the Waymo AV was parked at the right side curb of the road on [XXX], an SUV that was passing the parked Waymo AV in the rightmost lane made contact with the rear drivers side of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV did not sustain damage the SUV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30412-5220 v2ADSCruise LLC2023-04 4:45San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported3IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-5287 v2ADSCruise LLC2023-04 03:15Austin, TX2022 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-5288 v2ADSCruise LLC2023-04 03:15Austin, TX2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported9StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-5458ADSCruise LLC2023-04 00:35San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSSUVNo Injuries Reported0StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-5459ADSCruise LLC2023-04 23:35San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries Reported10IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-5460ADSCruise LLC2023-04 20:13San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-5461ADSCruise LLC2023-04 21:59San Francisco, CA2022 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported4IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-5462ADSCruise LLC2023-04 14:58Mesa, AZ2020 Cruise AVADSOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries Reported34StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30413-5396ADSMay Mobility2023-04 16:16Ann Arbor, MI2020 Lexus RX450hADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported18Street
On Friday April [XXX] at 16:16 local time, the May shuttle was driving Westbound on [XXX] in Ann Arbor, MI in autonomous mode and was followed by another vehicle. The following vehicle was traveling approximately twice a…On Friday April [XXX] at 16:16 local time, the May shuttle was driving Westbound on [XXX] in Ann Arbor, MI in autonomous mode and was followed by another vehicle. The following vehicle was traveling approximately twice as fast as the May shuttle and catching up to the May shuttle from behind. The May shuttle began to slow for traffic ahead, which was stopping for a red light, but the following vehicle did not decelerate. While slowing, the May shuttle identified a bollard on the side of the road as a likely pedestrian and added a safety buffer which intersected with the predicted trajectory of the shuttle. This caused the shuttle to increase deceleration to avoid the projected collision with the buffer. The following vehicle started braking late and impacted the May shuttle from behind with a relative velocity of 6.2 m/s. Re-simulation of this event with a future software version shows that the May shuttle would have decelerated less abruptly.
30531-5205 v2ADSTransdev Alternative Services2023-04 10:46San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
The content of this report is unchanged from the initial report. On April [XXX], 2023 at 10:46 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenge…The content of this report is unchanged from the initial report. On April [XXX], 2023 at 10:46 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX] in the leftmost lane as it was approaching the intersection with [XXX]. The signal for traffic proceeding south on [XXX] was green for the Waymo AV as it approached the intersection. As the Waymo AV approached, an individual riding a motorized scooter traveling north on [XXX] proceeded to turn left onto westbound [XXX], across the paths of the Waymo AV and other oncoming vehicles. The Waymo AV began to brake, and the Waymo AV test driver transitioned to manual mode and brought the Waymo AV to a stop. A passenger car traveling directly behind the Waymo AV then made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. The individual riding the scooter was not contacted by the Waymo AV or any other vehicle. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was not engaged and a test driver was operating the Waymo AV in manual mode. Both the Waymo AV and the passenger car sustained damage, and the individual on the motorized scooter left the scene. Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this crash under Request No 1 of Standing General Order 2021 01 because a Vulnerable Road User was involved. Transdev may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This is a duplicate of report ID 30531-5088-1.
30531-5604ADSTransdev Alternative Services2023-04 17:29Santa Monica, CA2021 Jaguar I-PACEADSSUVNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On April [XXX], 2023 at 5:29 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Santa Monica, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southwest on [XXX] in th…On April [XXX], 2023 at 5:29 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Santa Monica, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southwest on [XXX] in the rightmost lane as it was approaching the intersection with [XXX]. The signal for traffic proceeding southwest on [XXX] was red as the Waymo AV approached the intersection and came to a stop. The signal for traffic proceeding southwest on [XXX] then turned green, and traffic in adjacent lanes began moving while the Waymo AV waited for traffic in its lane to begin to move. The SUV that had been stopped directly behind the Waymo AV began moving forward and the front of the SUV made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the driver's seating position). The Waymo sustained damage. Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Transdev may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This report is a duplicate of report ID 30270-5586-1.
30531-5605ADSTransdev Alternative Services2023-04 22:56San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PACEADSSUVNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On April [XXX], 2023 at 10:56 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. While traveling northwest on [XXX], the Waymo AV …On April [XXX], 2023 at 10:56 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. While traveling northwest on [XXX], the Waymo AV came to a stop to yield to an oncoming SUV in a narrow passageway. The SUV proceeded around the Waymo AV and made contact with the left rear sensor housing of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the driver's seating position). The driver of the SUV stopped briefly but left before sharing their information. The Waymo sustained damage. Transdev Alternative Serivces is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Transdev may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This is a duplicate of report ID 30270-5584-1.
30610-5232 v2ADSZoox, Inc.2023-04 11:19San Francisco, CA2017 Toyota HighlanderADSOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
A Zoox vehicle in autonomy was proceeding northbound on [XXX] in stop-and-go traffic through an active construction zone. At the same time, an e-scooter traveling near the right curb was passing other slow traffic behind…A Zoox vehicle in autonomy was proceeding northbound on [XXX] in stop-and-go traffic through an active construction zone. At the same time, an e-scooter traveling near the right curb was passing other slow traffic behind the Zoox vehicle. Before the e-scooter could also pass the Zoox vehicle on the right, the e-scooter weaved away from the curb, seemingly to avoid a drainage grate, and came within a close following distance behind the Zoox vehicle. As the Zoox vehicle came to a stop again for traffic ahead the e-scooter rider did not stop, and the e-scooter made contact with the right rear tail light of the Zoox vehicle. The e-scooter rider remained upright, did not stop to exchange information, and immediately rode off while the Zoox vehicle was still stopped. There were no injuries and police were not called. The damage to the Zoox vehicle was limited to a cracked tail light lens. This 10-Day update provides complete information for this incident.
540-5227 v2ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-04 4:45San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported3Intersection
On April 18, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed a 10 day update to an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufact…On April 18, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed a 10 day update to an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file:30412-5220-2)
540-5296 v2ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-04 03:15Austin, TX2022 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Street
On April 24, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed a 10-day updated Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured …On April 24, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed a 10-day updated Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file:30412-5287-2)
540-5297 v2ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-04 03:15Austin, TX2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported9Street
On April 24, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed a 10-day updated Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured …On April 24, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed a 10-day updated Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file:30412-5288-2)
540-5488ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-04 00:35San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSSUVNo Injuries Reported0Street
On May 12, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-opera…On May 12, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-5458-1)
540-5489ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-04 23:35San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries Reported10Intersection
On May 12, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-opera…On May 12, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-5459-1)
540-5490ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-04 20:13San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Street
On May 12, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-opera…On May 12, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-5460-1)
540-5491ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-04 21:59San Francisco, CA2022 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported4Intersection
On May 12, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-opera…On May 12, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-5461-1)
540-5492ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-04 14:58Mesa, AZ2020 Cruise AVADSOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries Reported34Street
On May 12, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-opera…On May 12, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-5462-1)
669-5206 v3ADSHyundai Motor America2023-04 15:45Gahanna, OH2023 Hyundai Santa FeADASSUVNo Injuries Reported70Highway / Freeway
A company associate was operating the subject Santa Fe vehicle heading north on the [XXX] with the Highway Drive Assist ("HDA") feature engaged. A Nissan vehicle merged into the subject vehicle's lane and made contact wi…A company associate was operating the subject Santa Fe vehicle heading north on the [XXX] with the Highway Drive Assist ("HDA") feature engaged. A Nissan vehicle merged into the subject vehicle's lane and made contact with the driver's side of the Santa Fe resulting in a crash. The Hyundai vehicle was immobilized requiring towing assistance. No airbags allegedly deployed during the crash. A police report was filed with Gahanna Police Department and the report number is 23GAH.8195.AC. NASO is in process of retrieving the police report. 10-Day Update to 669-5206-1: No new information received. Monthly Update to 669-5206-2: According to the police report, the Santa Fe was travelling in the left lane of the road when the Nissan vehicle attempted a lane change directly into their lane of travel making contact with the Santa Fe's right side. The police report also indicated that no autonomous driving function was engaged in the Santa Fe vehicle at the time of the incident. The operator of the Nissan vehicle was cited for an unspecified charge.
30270-5114 v2ADSWaymo LLC2023-03 20:04San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries ReportedStreet
The content of this report is unchanged from the initial report submitted on March 21, 2023 [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION]. On March [XXX], 2023 at approximately 8:04 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous…The content of this report is unchanged from the initial report submitted on March 21, 2023 [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION]. On March [XXX], 2023 at approximately 8:04 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a pothole on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling in the second lane on a four-lane section of northbound [XXX] when the passenger side rear tire made contact with a pothole. The tire began to deflate and the Waymo AV pulled over on a side street. At the time of impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-5318ADSWaymo LLC2023-03 20:26San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSOther Fixed ObjectNo Injuries Reported2Parking Lot
On March [XXX], 2023 at 8:27 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco was in a collision involving a fixed object on [XXX] near [XXX]. As the Waymo AV was leaving a parking lot to turn left…On March [XXX], 2023 at 8:27 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco was in a collision involving a fixed object on [XXX] near [XXX]. As the Waymo AV was leaving a parking lot to turn left onto [XXX], the front of the Waymo AV made contact with a chain that was connected between a parking lot road sign and a temporary pole. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The road sign fell down due to tension on the chain. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-5319ADSWaymo LLC2023-03 12:03Phoenix, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported0Street
On March [XXX], 2023 at 12:03 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a heavy truck on [XXX] between [XXX] and [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound …On March [XXX], 2023 at 12:03 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a heavy truck on [XXX] between [XXX] and [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX] when it approached a heavy truck and trailer that was positioning to reverse perpendicularly across [XXX] to back into an adjacent driveway. The Waymo AV stopped and the truck and trailer began reversing across [XXX]. The rear passengers side corner of the truck then made contact with the front drivers side corner of the stationary Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-5320ADSWaymo LLC2023-03 21:28San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On March [XXX], 2023 at 9:28 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped in the dedicated l…On March [XXX], 2023 at 9:28 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped in the dedicated left turn lane facing west on [XXX], awaiting a green signal to turn onto [XXX]. The signal for traffic proceeding west on [XXX] turned green, and traffic in adjacent lanes began moving. The left turn arrow signal for the dedicated turn lane occupied by the Waymo AV remained red. The passenger car that had been stopped directly behind the Waymo AV began moving forward. The front of the passenger car made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the drivers seating position). The passenger car sustained minor damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-5322ADSWaymo LLC2023-03 2:19San Bruno, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries Reported64Highway / Freeway
On March [XXX], 2023 at 2:19 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Bruno, CA was in a collision involving road debris on [XXX] at the interchange ramp for [XXX] ([XXX]). The Waymo AV was travelin…On March [XXX], 2023 at 2:19 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Bruno, CA was in a collision involving road debris on [XXX] at the interchange ramp for [XXX] ([XXX]). The Waymo AV was traveling south on [XXX] in the rightmost exit lane for [XXX] towards [XXX] when it made contact with road debris (tire scrap). At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the drivers seating position). The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-5323ADSWaymo LLC2023-03 17:10San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported8Intersection
On March [XXX], 2023 at 5:10 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] between [XXX] and [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling …On March [XXX], 2023 at 5:10 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] between [XXX] and [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling north on [XXX] in autonomous mode, merging into the rightmost lane. As the Waymo AV merged, the test driver transitioned from autonomous mode to manual mode and began accelerating. The front of the Waymo AV made contact with the rear of a passenger car that was stopped in the rightmost lane. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was not engaged and a test driver was operating the Waymo AV in manual mode. Both the Waymo AV and the passenger car sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-5324ADSWaymo LLC2023-03 19:00Tempe, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarMinor1Street
On March [XXX], 2023 at 7:00 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX] b…On March [XXX], 2023 at 7:00 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX] behind traffic that was backed up from the intersection with [XXX]. As the Waymo AV was accelerating from a stop, a passenger vehicle approached the Waymo AV from behind and made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the drivers seating position). The Waymo AV test driver reported having a minor injury and the passenger vehicle left the scene. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-5325ADSWaymo LLC2023-03 10:43Los Angeles, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSSUVNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On March [XXX], 2023 at 10:43 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Los Angeles, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped in the center lane of a thre…On March [XXX], 2023 at 10:43 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Los Angeles, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped in the center lane of a three-lane road behind a passenger vehicle for a red light facing southwest on [XXX] at [XXX] in autonomous mode. The light turned green while cross-traffic remained backed up in the intersection. The Waymo AV nudged forward and slowed to a stop, yielding for the blocking cross traffic. An SUV that had been stopped behind the Waymo AV proceeded forward and made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the drivers seating position). The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-5326ADSWaymo LLC2023-03 13:35Tempe, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported2Intersection
On March [XXX], 2023 at 1:35 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] and [XXX]. While attempting a right turn in autonomous mode from…On March [XXX], 2023 at 1:35 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] and [XXX]. While attempting a right turn in autonomous mode from westbound [XXX] onto northbound [XXX], the Waymo AV was yielding to traffic approaching from the left. As the Waymo AV attempted to proceed, the test driver transitioned to manual mode and brought the Waymo AV to a stop. A passenger car behind the Waymo AV proceeded forward and made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was not engaged and a test driver was operating the Waymo AV in manual mode. The Waymo AV and the passenger vehicle sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30412-4960 v2ADSCruise LLC2023-03 01:06San Francisco, CA2022 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported3IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-4996 v2ADSCruise LLC2023-03 13:01Tempe, AZ2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarMinor6IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-5101 v2ADSCruise LLC2023-03 3:26San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported21IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-5136 v2ADSCruise LLC2023-03 04:29San Francisco, CA2022 Cruise AVADSOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries Reported15StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-5140 v2ADSCruise LLC2023-03 14:46San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSBusNo Injuries Reported10StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-5229ADSCruise LLC2023-03 04:23San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported0IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-5240ADSCruise LLC2023-03 23:51San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported0StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-5241ADSCruise LLC2023-03 21:49San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries Reported10StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-5242ADSCruise LLC2023-03 03:20San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries Reported12StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-5243ADSCruise LLC2023-03 23:30San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30530-5289ADSAurora Operations, Inc.2023-03 08:01Weatherford, TX2022 Peterbilt 579mADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported65Highway / Freeway
At 8:01 AM CDT on 3/[XXX]/23, an Aurora Class 8 truck was traveling westbound in autonomy mode on [XXX] near [XXX] when a passing vehicle encroached on the Aurora trucks lane. The Aurora truck nudged right for the vehicl…At 8:01 AM CDT on 3/[XXX]/23, an Aurora Class 8 truck was traveling westbound in autonomy mode on [XXX] near [XXX] when a passing vehicle encroached on the Aurora trucks lane. The Aurora truck nudged right for the vehicle encroaching on the lane. This vehicle continued to veer toward Aurora's truck at over 65 miles per hour, causing a collision. Aurora disengaged autonomy before impact and pulled to the shoulder along with the involved vehicle. Both vehicles were able to be driven from the scene, and there were no reported injuries.
30531-5328 v2ADSTransdev Alternative Services2023-03 21:28San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On March [XXX], 2023 at 9:28 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped in the dedicated…On March [XXX], 2023 at 9:28 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped in the dedicated left turn lane facing west on [XXX], awaiting a green signal to turn onto [XXX]. The signal for traffic proceeding west on [XXX] turned green, and traffic in adjacent lanes began moving. The left turn arrow signal for the dedicated turn lane occupied by the Waymo AV remained red. The passenger car that had been stopped directly behind the Waymo AV began moving forward. The front of the passenger car made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was prest (in the driver's seat). Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this crash under Request no. 2 of Standing Gneral Order 2021-01. Transdev may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This is a duplicate of 30270-5320-1.
30531-5329 v2ADSTransdev Alternative Services2023-03 2:19San Bruno, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries Reported64Highway / Freeway
On March [XXX], 2023 at 2:19 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV" ) operating in San Bruno, CA was in a collision involving road debris on [XXX] at the interchange ramp for [XXX] ([XXX]). The Waymo AV was travel…On March [XXX], 2023 at 2:19 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV" ) operating in San Bruno, CA was in a collision involving road debris on [XXX] at the interchange ramp for [XXX] ([XXX]). The Waymo AV was traveling south on [XXX] in the rightmost exit lane for [XXX] towards [XXX] when it made contact with road debris (tire scrap). At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the driver's seating position). The Waymo AV sustained damage. Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General 2021-01. Transdev may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This is a duplicate of 30270-5322-1.
30531-5330 v2ADSTransdev Alternative Services2023-03 17:10San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported8Intersection
On March [XXX], 2023 at 5:10 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] between [XXX] and [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling…On March [XXX], 2023 at 5:10 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] between [XXX] and [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling north on [XXX] in autonomous mode, merging into the rightmost lane. As the Waymo AV merged, the test driver transitioned from autonomous mode to manual mode and began accelerating. The front of the Waymo AV made contact with the rear of a passenger car that was stopped in the rightmost lane. At the time of the impact, the Waymo's Level 4 ADS was not engaged and a test driver was operating the Waymo AV in manual mode. Both the Waymo AV and the passenger car sustained damage. Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this crash under Request no. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Transdev may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This is a duplicate of 30270-5323-1.
30531-5331ADSTransdev Alternative Services2023-03 19:00Tempe, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarMinor1Street
On March [XXX], 2023 at 7:00 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX]…On March [XXX], 2023 at 7:00 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle on [XXX] near [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX] behind traffic that was backed up from the intersection with [XXX]. As the Waymo AV was accelerating from a stop, a passenger vehicle approached the Waymo AV from behind and made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and. a test driver was present (in the driver's seating position). The Waymo AV test driver reported having a minor injury and the passenger vehicle left the scene. Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this crash under Request no. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Transdev may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This report is a duplicate of 30270-5324-1.
30531-5335ADSTransdev Alternative Services2023-03 10:43Los Angeles, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSSUVNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On March [XXX], 2023 at 10:43 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Los Angeles, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped in the center lane of a th…On March [XXX], 2023 at 10:43 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Los Angeles, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped in the center lane of a three-lane road behind a passenger vehicle for a red light facing southwest on [XXX] at [XXX] in autonomous mode. The light turned green while cross-traffic remained backed up in the intersection. The Waymo AV nudged forward and slowed to a stop, yielding for the blocking cross traffic. An SUV that had been stopped behind the Waymo AV proceeded forward and made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the driver's seating position). The Waymo AV sustained damage. Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this crash under Request no. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Transdev may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This is a duplicate of 30270-5325-1.
30531-5336ADSTransdev Alternative Services2023-03 13:35Tempe, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported2Intersection
On March [XXX], 2023 at 1:35 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] and [XXX]. While attempting a right turn in autonomous mode fr…On March [XXX], 2023 at 1:35 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] and [XXX]. While attempting a right turn in autonomous mode from westbound [XXX] onto northbound [XXX], the Waymo AV was yielding to traffic approaching from the left. As the Waymo AV attempted to proceed, the test driver transitioned to manual mode and brought the Waymo AV to a stop. A passenger car behind the Waymo AV proceeded forward and made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was not engaged and a test driver was operating the Waymo AV in manual mode. The Waymo AV and the passenger vehicle sustained damage. Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this crash under Request no. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Transdev may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This is a duplicate of 30270-5326-1.
30610-5224ADSZoox, Inc.2023-03 22:45Paradise, NV2016 Toyota HighlanderADSOther Fixed ObjectNo Injuries Reported4Street
A Zoox vehicle in autonomous mode was traveling northbound on an access road towards [XXX] in Las Vegas, Nevada, when the driver disengaged for a vehicle in the oncoming lane rounding a tight curve. Approximately eleven …A Zoox vehicle in autonomous mode was traveling northbound on an access road towards [XXX] in Las Vegas, Nevada, when the driver disengaged for a vehicle in the oncoming lane rounding a tight curve. Approximately eleven seconds after disengaging, the driver proceeded in manual mode making a right turn and struck the curb at low speed. There were no injuries and police were not called.
30610-5225 v2ADSZoox, Inc.2023-03 14:40Paradise, NV2016 Toyota HighlanderADSPickup TruckNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
A Zoox vehicle in autonomous mode was stopped in a merge lane from northbound [XXX] onto [XXX] yielding and waiting for cross traffic. As it began to creep forward, it again came to a stop and it was struck by the vehicl…A Zoox vehicle in autonomous mode was stopped in a merge lane from northbound [XXX] onto [XXX] yielding and waiting for cross traffic. As it began to creep forward, it again came to a stop and it was struck by the vehicle behind at low speed. There were no injuries and police were not called. This report was updated to change the mileage section to "Highlander".
540-4965 v2ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2023-03 01:06San Francisco, CA2022 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported3Intersection
On March 15, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-ope…On March 15, 2023, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-4960-2)

What this table is and is not. Rows are the operators' own filings, not verified cases, and a filing does not establish fault. NHTSA redacts most Level 2 narratives as confidential business information, so the text column is empty for most Tesla rows; the structured columns are not redacted. When one crash is filed by several entities, an operator and the fleet owner for example, NHTSA gives the filings one same_incident_id; the "one row per incident" view collapses them into a single row at the highest severity any filer alleged, with the count of filings and every report number beside it, so a count of incidents or deaths is not inflated by duplicate filings. The table joins NHTSA's current files (incidents from June 2025, after the third amended order) with its 2021-2025 archive, which used an older layout: severity labels, roadway and weather fields differ between the two sets, and the source_set column in the CSV says which one a row came from. Level 2 reports are shown here because the file contains them, but they are not cases in the register, which counts a vehicle as a robot only when nobody inside is responsible for driving. Source: NHTSA SGO 2021-01. On 7 November 2026 we filed a public comment built on this table in the California Public Utilities Commission's Rulemaking R.12-12-011, asking for machine-readable mileage files and a crosswalk between the Commission's incident categories and the SGO definitions. The themed reading of the driverless narratives is on the reports page.