The MachineRecord
NHTSA Standing General Order 2021-01

The SGO file, in a form you can search

NHTSA publishes the crash reports as three CSV files of 116 columns each, with several versions of the same report mixed in. This is the same data as one table: driverless systems (ADS) and Level 2 driver assistance side by side, 2021 to today including NHTSA's archive, one row per report at its latest version, every row traceable to its NHTSA report number. Free, CC BY 4.0, refreshed from NHTSA on every pipeline run.

Reports
8612
Fatal
87
Of them Level 2
79
Reporting entities
64
Incidents
2019-08 to 2026-09

8612 reports, showing 7401 to 7500.

Report IDProgramEntityIncidentPlaceVehicleEngagedCrash withSeveritySpeed, mphRoadwayNarrative
13781-4557 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-12 18:12Madera, CA2021 Tesla Model YADASOther Fixed ObjectUnknown52Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4558 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-12 00:18Dallas, TX2021 Tesla Model YADASSUVUnknown14IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4559 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-12 15:37Castro Valley, CA2022 Tesla Model YADASOther Fixed ObjectUnknown40Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4560 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-12 01:01West Covina, CA2022 Tesla Model 3ADASSUVUnknown33IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4564 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-12 06:25Los Angeles, CA2021 Tesla Model YADASUnknownUnknown18Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4565 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-12 16:32Santa Fe, NM2018 Tesla Model 3ADASSUVUnknown26IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4577 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-12 23:59Edgmont Township, PA2021 Tesla Model YADASOther Fixed ObjectUnknown33Rural RoadRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4585 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-12 14:05Los Angeles, CA2021 Tesla Model 3ADASPassenger CarUnknown49Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4586 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-12 15:46Natchitoches, LA2022 Tesla Model YADASOther, see NarrativeUnknown52Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4588 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-12 19:27Long Beach, CA2021 Tesla Model 3ADASPickup TruckUnknown26Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4599 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-12Cima, CA2021 Tesla Model YADASOther, see NarrativeModerate77Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4604 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-12 04:02Marietta, GA2019 Tesla Model 3ADASOther Fixed ObjectMinor21Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-8038 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-12 20:32Goodyear, AZ2022 Tesla Model YUnknown, see NarrativeOther, see NarrativeSerious66Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
28349-4582 v5Level 2Lucid USA, Inc.2022-12 17:04Ventura, CA2023 Lucid Air (All grades)ADASOther Fixed ObjectUnknown43Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30270-4363 v2ADSWaymo LLC2022-12 21:05Phoenix, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSOther Fixed ObjectNo Injuries Reported11Parking Lot
Other than the updated Speed Limit field, the content of this report is unchanged from the initial report submitted on December 5, 2022 [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION]. On December [XXX], 2022 …Other than the updated Speed Limit field, the content of this report is unchanged from the initial report submitted on December 5, 2022 [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION]. On December [XXX], 2022 at 9:05 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a fixed object in a parking lot on the 4100 block of [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound in a parking lot on [XXX] when it approached a parking lot barrier arm. The Waymo AV initially slowed for the arm but then proceeded forward, making contact with it and opening it. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-4505 v2ADSWaymo LLC2022-12 13:50San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Street
Other than updating the Were All Passengers Belted? field, which was initially submitted incorrectly, the content of this report is unchanged from the initial report submitted on December 18, 2022 [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN …Other than updating the Were All Passengers Belted? field, which was initially submitted incorrectly, the content of this report is unchanged from the initial report submitted on December 18, 2022 [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION]. On December [XXX], 2022 at 1:50 PM PST, a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, CA was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] near the intersection with [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX] in autonomous mode when it slowed and stopped for a parallel parking vehicle ahead. A passenger car following the Waymo AV did not stop in time and made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV at a speed of about 7 MPH. At the time of impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode with a test driver present (in the driver's seating position). Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This report was submitted from the Pacific time zone on the required date.
30270-4706ADSWaymo LLC2022-12 16:54San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSSUVNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On December [XXX], 2022 at 4:54 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped facing east on [XXX] beh…On December [XXX], 2022 at 4:54 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped facing east on [XXX] behind stopped traffic in the left-most through lane in autonomous mode. An SUV approached from behind and attempted to change lanes into the left turn lane, making contact with the left rear sensor of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the drivers seating position). Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-4707ADSWaymo LLC2022-12 12:35San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On December [XXX], 2022 at 12:35 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped facing sou…On December [XXX], 2022 at 12:35 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped facing south on [XXX] for a red light in the right lane of the three-lane street while in autonomous mode. A passenger vehicle approached from behind and made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the drivers seating position). The Waymo sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-4708ADSWaymo LLC2022-12 5:18Sacaton, AZ2021 Peterbilt 579 EpiqADSOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries Reported51Highway / Freeway
On December [XXX], 2022 at 5:18 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) Peterbilt Class 8 semi-truck and trailer operating in Sacaton, Arizona was in a collision involving a Class 8 semi-truck and flat-bed trailer o…On December [XXX], 2022 at 5:18 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) Peterbilt Class 8 semi-truck and trailer operating in Sacaton, Arizona was in a collision involving a Class 8 semi-truck and flat-bed trailer on [XXX], near mile marker [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling straight in autonomous mode in the leftmost lane, when the test driver took manual control and attempted a right lane change. As the test driver prepared to make the lane change, there was a Class 8 semi-truck and flat-bed trailer passing in the adjacent right lane. As the Waymo AV test driver initiated the lane change, the Waymo AV made contact with the rear corner of the flat-bed trailer. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was not engaged and a test driver was operating the Waymo AV in manual mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-4710ADSWaymo LLC2022-12 03:15San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On December [XXX], 2022 at 3:15 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle on [XXX] and [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped facing nor…On December [XXX], 2022 at 3:15 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle on [XXX] and [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped facing north on [XXX] for a red light in the right lane of the three-lane street while in autonomous mode. A passenger vehicle approached from behind and stopped behind the Waymo AV before eventually proceeding forward and making contact with the rear of the Waymo AV while the AV was still stopped at the red light. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the drivers seating position). The Waymo sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30412-4511 v2ADSCruise LLC2022-12 23:23San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-4540 v2ADSCruise LLC2022-12 08:50San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarUnknown2StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-4640ADSCruise LLC2022-12 23:51San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported6StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-4642ADSCruise LLC2022-12 23:59San Francisco, CA2022 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported19StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30413-4352ADSMay Mobility2022-12 18:38Ann Arbor, MI2020 Lexus RX450hADSSUVNo Injuries Reported0Street
Operator turned onto [XXX] headed westbound approaching the stop sign at the intersection with [XXX]. In autonomy, the subject vehicle came to a stop. An SUV behind the subject vehicle then rear-ended the subject vehicle…Operator turned onto [XXX] headed westbound approaching the stop sign at the intersection with [XXX]. In autonomy, the subject vehicle came to a stop. An SUV behind the subject vehicle then rear-ended the subject vehicle. No injuries were reported by the operator or the driver of the other vehicle and there was no damage to the SUV and a small crack in the bumper for the subject vehicle.
30413-4378ADSMay Mobility2022-12 09:02Sun City, AZ2021 Toyota SiennaADSMotorcycleNo Injuries Reported0Street
Subject vehicle left the [XXX] headed southwest on [XXX]. Following the [XXX] intersection a motorcycle started following us closely. The subject vehicle came to a stop and the motorcyclist attempted to brake in time, bu…Subject vehicle left the [XXX] headed southwest on [XXX]. Following the [XXX] intersection a motorcycle started following us closely. The subject vehicle came to a stop and the motorcyclist attempted to brake in time, but hit the motorcycle's left mirror/handlebar against the rear passenger-side of the subject vehicle's bumper.
30490-4473ADSBeep, Inc.2022-12 17:53Port Saint Lucie, FL2018 Navya ARMAUnknown, see NarrativePassenger CarNo Injuries Reported1Street
On December [XXX], 2022, a Navya ARMA shuttle operated by Beep (VIN 1N9A1SACXJS[XXX]) was involved in a non-injury collision while operating in manual mode on [XXX] in Port Saint Lucie, FL. While driving along [XXX] und…On December [XXX], 2022, a Navya ARMA shuttle operated by Beep (VIN 1N9A1SACXJS[XXX]) was involved in a non-injury collision while operating in manual mode on [XXX] in Port Saint Lucie, FL. While driving along [XXX] under autonomous control, the shuttle encountered a parked vehicle partially blocking its path, requiring disengagement of the autonomous drive system. The safety driver attempted to manually drive the shuttle around the parked vehicle to reengage the autonomous drive system. While manually steering the shuttle around the parked vehicle blocking its path, the shuttle failed to respond to manual control input and steered to the left, impacting a parked vehicle at a low rate of speed on the opposite side of [XXX]. The six passengers onboard alighted the shuttle, an accident report was filed with the local police, and the shuttle was removed from the scene. Initial reports from the onboard safety driver indicated that while steering around the vehicle blocking the shuttle's path, the shuttle became unresponsive to control input. The safety driver released the operator present button on the vehicle controller, which serves as dead man switch however, the vehicle failed to stop. After the incident, further investigation by Navya confirmed that the root cause of the incident was a failure of the Xbox 360 controller used to manually control the vehicle. Contact with the parked vehicle occurred between the time of failure and the vehicle drive system recognizing that the controller had failed an elapsed time of 4.05 seconds. In response to the incident, Beep suspended operation of all Navya ARMA vehicles pending identification and implementation of appropriate solutions to mitigate the risk of this failure leading to future incidents. Subsequent investigation by Beep and Navya determined that the vehicle control software, NavyaDrive, is limited in its ability to monitor the validity of control signal input received from the Xbox 360 controller. As the safety driver began to manually steer the vehicle, the controller failed, sending constant turning input to the vehicle drive system leading to the collision. Though Navya developed software mitigations due to prior issues encountered with the controller, those mitigations were ineffective with respect to the failure leading to the incident on December [XXX]. Further, due to the short time between the controller failing and the collision (2.34sec), the safety driver was unable to identify the controller failure and trigger the emergency stop before the collision occurred. In response to the incident, Navya is integrating a revised manual control system on the ARMA shuttle platform. The revised manual control system utilizes industrial-grade components for improved electromechanical reliability and allows for active monitoring of the control system health, eliminating the root cause of the failure that led to the incident on December [XXX]. Software upgrades of all Navya ARMA vehicles will further reintroduce automated braking function while the ARMA vehicle is under manual control. Beep is working with Navya to retrofit its fleet of ARMA vehicles with the revised manual control system as well as retrain and recertify its safety driver staff on the updated NavyaDrive software. Discussion of the root cause analysis and solution design for the revised manual control system will be provided to NHTSA as a supplement to this report.
30531-4506 v2ADSTransdev Alternative Services2022-12 13:50San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Street
Other than updating the "Were All Passengers Belted?" field, which was initially submitted incorrectly, the content of this report is unchanged from the initial report. On December [XXX], 2022 at 1:50 PM PST, a Waymo A…Other than updating the "Were All Passengers Belted?" field, which was initially submitted incorrectly, the content of this report is unchanged from the initial report. On December [XXX], 2022 at 1:50 PM PST, a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, CA was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] near the intersection with [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX] in autonomous mode when it slowed and stopped for a parallel parking vehicle ahead. A passenger car following the Waymo AV did not stop in time and made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV at a speed of about 7 MPH. At the time of impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode with a test driver present (in the driver's seating position). Both vehicles sustained damage. Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Transdev may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This report is a duplicate of WaymoLLC-20221217-0 (rev.20221217234005).
30531-4719 v4ADSTransdev Alternative Services2022-12 16:54San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I- PaceADSSUVNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
Updated: LATITUDE should read: [XXX] and LONGITUDE should read: [XXX]. Previous updates did not save correct numbers latitude and longitud. On December [XXX], 2022 at 4:54 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") o…Updated: LATITUDE should read: [XXX] and LONGITUDE should read: [XXX]. Previous updates did not save correct numbers latitude and longitud. On December [XXX], 2022 at 4:54 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving an SUV on [XXX] at [XXX].The Waymo AV was stopped facing east on [XXX] behind stopped traffic in the left-most through lane in autonomous mode. An SUV approached from behind and attempted to change lanes into the left turn lane, making contact with the left rear sensor of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the driver's seating position). Both vehicles sustained damage.Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Transdev may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This report is a duplicate of WaymoLLC-20221212-0 (rev.20230117152426).
30531-4720 v2ADSTransdev Alternative Services2022-12 12:35San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
Update: Latitude should read: [XXX] and longitude should read: [XXX]. Previous updates did not save correct numbers. On December [XXX], 2022 at 12:35 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV'') operating in San Franc…Update: Latitude should read: [XXX] and longitude should read: [XXX]. Previous updates did not save correct numbers. On December [XXX], 2022 at 12:35 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV'') operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle on [XXX] at [XXX].The Waymo AV was stopped facing south on [XXX] for a red light in the right lane of the three-lane street while in autonomous mode. A passenger vehicle approached from behind and made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the driver's seating position). The Waymo sustained damage. Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Transdev may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.This report is a duplicate of Waymo LLC WaymoLLC- 20221213-0 (rev.20230117152233).
30531-4721 v3ADSTransdev Alternative Services2022-12 05:18Sacaton, AZ2021 Peterbilt 579 EpiqADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported51Highway / Freeway
Updated: LATITUDE should read: [XXX] and LONGITUDE should read: [XXX]. Previous updates did not save correct numbers. On December [XXX], 2022 at 5:18 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV) Peterbilt Class 8 semi-t…Updated: LATITUDE should read: [XXX] and LONGITUDE should read: [XXX]. Previous updates did not save correct numbers. On December [XXX], 2022 at 5:18 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV) Peterbilt Class 8 semi-truck and trailer operating in Sacaton, Arizona was in a collision involving a Class 8 semi-truck and flat-bed trailer on [XXX], near mile marker [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling straight in autonomous mode in the leftmost lane, when the test driver took manual control and attempted a right lane change. As the test driver prepared to make the lane change, there was a Class 8 semi-truck and flat-bed trailer passing in the adjacent right lane. As the Waymo AV test driver initiated the lane change, the Waymo AV made contact with the rear corner of the flat-bed trailer. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was not engaged and a test driver was operating the Waymo AV in manual mode. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Transdev may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This report is a duplicate of WaymoLLC-20221216-0 (rev.20230117160244).
30531-4726 v2ADSTransdev Alternative Services2022-12 03:15San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
Update: Latitude should read: [XXX] and longitude should read: [XXX]. Previous updates did not save correct numbers. On December [XXX], 2022 at 3:15 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francis…Update: Latitude should read: [XXX] and longitude should read: [XXX]. Previous updates did not save correct numbers. On December [XXX], 2022 at 3:15 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle on [XXX] and [XXX].The Waymo AV was stopped facing north on [XXX] for a red light in the right lane of the three-lane street while in autonomous mode. A passenger vehicle approached from behind and stopped behind the Waymo AV before eventually proceeding forward and making contact with the rear of the Waymo AV while the AV was still stopped at the red light. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the drivers seating position). The Waymo sustained damage. Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Transdev may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This report is a duplicate of WaymoLLC-20221229-0 (rev.20230117153132).
30792-4714ADSWeRide Corp2022-12 16:31Las Vegas, NV2023 Nissan Leaf SV PlusADSSUVNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
At 4:31pm on 12/[XXX]/2023 a Weride safety officer operating a Weride L4 autonomous vehicle (car 1) was in autonomous mode traveling South Bound [XXX] and was stopped at the right turn lane for a red traffic light towar…At 4:31pm on 12/[XXX]/2023 a Weride safety officer operating a Weride L4 autonomous vehicle (car 1) was in autonomous mode traveling South Bound [XXX] and was stopped at the right turn lane for a red traffic light towards [XXX]. While the light was still red, our vehicle slowly moved forward and then yielded for incoming cross traffic. While yielding, the rear vehicle (car 2) behind us accelerated and collided with our vehicle (car 1). The safety driver then disengaged the vehicle as a precautionary measure (car 1) and moved over to examine the minor rear-end collision situation and exchange information with car 2 driver. Since the damage to weride car was minimal, it was driven back in manual mode.
540-4483 v2Level 2General Motors, LLC2022-12 16:27Millersville, MA2018 Cadillac CT6ADASSUVNo Injuries Reported65Highway / Freeway
The subject vehicle, a 2018 Cadillac CT6, was sideswiped by an SUV on a three lane highway. GM's current understanding of the crash is based on OnStar telematics data and the driver's statements after the crash to an On…The subject vehicle, a 2018 Cadillac CT6, was sideswiped by an SUV on a three lane highway. GM's current understanding of the crash is based on OnStar telematics data and the driver's statements after the crash to an OnStar representative. The subject vehicle was traveling northbound on [XXX] in Millersville, Maryland in the center lane of a three lane highway. Super Cruise was functionally engaged and active 8 seconds prior to the crash. There was also an override event 7 seconds prior to the crash, indicating driver took control of steering wheel. An SUV, also traveling northbound on [XXX], departed from the left hand lane and contacted the driver's side of the subject vehicle. The driver of the subject vehicle was buckled at the time of the incident. The driver side roof rail air bag, seat side air bag and seat belt pretensioner deployed. There were no other occupants in the subject vehicle. No injuries were reported. There is no updated information for the 10 day report.
540-4524 v2ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2022-12 23:23San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Street
On December 28, 2022, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed a 10 day update report to an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM…On December 28, 2022, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed a 10 day update report to an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-4511-2)
540-4541 v3ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2022-12 08:50San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarUnknown2Street
On December 30, 2022 GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed 10 day update report to an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) m…On December 30, 2022 GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed 10 day update report to an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-4540-2). This 10 day update is a correction to 10 Day Update Report 540-4541-2. The Investigator Name under Post-Crash Information was added.
540-4670ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2022-12 23:51San Francisco, CA2023 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported6Street
On January 13, 2023 GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-op…On January 13, 2023 GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-4640-1)
540-4671ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2022-12 23:59San Francisco, CA2022 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported19Street
On January 13, 2023 GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-op…On January 13, 2023 GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-4642-1)
1243-4347 v3Level 2Subaru of America, Inc.2022-11 07:30Covington, LA2020 Subaru ForesterADASPickup TruckSerious84Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
1243-4978 v3Level 2Subaru of America, Inc.2022-11 00:30Shallotte, NC2021 Subaru OutbackADASOther, see NarrativeModerate74Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
1306-4286 v2Level 2Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing2022-11 13:30Hopkins, KY2021 Toyota VenzaADASOther Fixed ObjectUnknown60Highway / Freeway
The entries in this report are based on unconfirmed allegations. Toyota received a contact on Nov. [XXX], 2022 in which the customer stated that, "he had an accident, and it was a total loss and he wanted to let Toyota k…The entries in this report are based on unconfirmed allegations. Toyota received a contact on Nov. [XXX], 2022 in which the customer stated that, "he had an accident, and it was a total loss and he wanted to let Toyota know he had a newborn and his wife and him is okay. Guest sts he wanted to thank Toyota and he will buy Toyota again." The customer alleged, "he had the lane assistance on and he was looking at his son and he just flipped 3 times and then someone had to come help." The customer also stated, "The vehicle was towed away from the scene and the customer's wife went to the hospital." Through additional communication with the customer on Nov. [XXX], 2022, Toyota was informed that cruise control was alleged to have been engaged during the incident. This report is a 10-Day update. The original report ID is 1306-4286-1.
1306-4287 v3Level 2Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing2022-11 03:28McDonald, NC2022 Lexus RX450hLADASOther Fixed ObjectUnknown69Highway / Freeway
The entries in this report are based on unconfirmed allegations. Toyota received a contact on Nov. [XXX], 2022 in which the customer stated that while driving southbound on [XXX], about 1 mile from [XXX], "He fell asleep…The entries in this report are based on unconfirmed allegations. Toyota received a contact on Nov. [XXX], 2022 in which the customer stated that while driving southbound on [XXX], about 1 mile from [XXX], "He fell asleep while using lane assist and cruise control, the vehicle was practically driving itself. He hit 2 highway rails on his drivers side and the passenger side going 70 mph." He indicated that he wanted, "someone at Lexus to explain how his vehicle's airbags did not deploy going 70mph on cruise control and lane assist." Additionally, the customer stated, "He and his friend that was in the passenger seat are slightly injured...he called 911 and they had a local tow service tow the vehicle to a lot." The customer stated that his driver seat belt was on, and that an occupant was in the rear seat laying down without the seat belt fastened. The customer also stated, "He and his friend that was in the passenger seat are slightly injured." and that, "knees are bothering the driver." On Nov. 18, 2022, Toyota conducted further review of the customer's statement and determined that the crash was reportable. On Nov. 30, 2022, Toyota received a field report related to the incident, which included Vehicle Control History (VCH) and Event Data Recording (EDR). VCH provides an approximately 7.7 second pre-crash recording, and EDR provides an approximately 4.8 second pre-crash recording. From the data, Toyota observed that Lane Trace Assist (LTA) and Dynamic Radar Cruise Control (DRCC) were engaged in the moments leading up to the crash event. LTA was engaged from the start of the recording until approximately 6.1 seconds prior to the crash event, at which point driver steering input disengaged the system. Prior to disengagement of LTA, the VCH recording shows the driver's hands were detected on the steering wheel. DRCC was engaged from the start of the recording until the crash event. This report is a Monthly Update. The original report ID is 1306-4287-1.
1306-4389 v2ADSToyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing2022-11 15:43Ann Arbor, MI2020 Lexus RX450HUnknown, see NarrativeNon-Motorist: CyclistNo Injuries Reported4Intersection
This report is being submitted because May Mobility notified Toyota on Dec. 9, 2022 of 1-Day Report submission 30413-4170-1,related to an incident that occurred on Nov. [XXX], 2022. Toyota has no additional information o…This report is being submitted because May Mobility notified Toyota on Dec. 9, 2022 of 1-Day Report submission 30413-4170-1,related to an incident that occurred on Nov. [XXX], 2022. Toyota has no additional information on this incident beyond what was submitted in the aforementioned 1-Day Report. Please refer to the report from May Mobility for details. This report is a 10 Day update. The original report ID is 1306-4389-1.
1306-4427 v2Level 2Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing2022-11 13:11Novi, MI2022 Lexus NX350ADASPassenger CarUnknown31Highway / Freeway
On December 13, 2022 Toyota received a field report related to this crash incident, in which the owner's allegation was related to airbag non-deployment. During the crash event, the vehicle was rear-ended by an SUV, then…On December 13, 2022 Toyota received a field report related to this crash incident, in which the owner's allegation was related to airbag non-deployment. During the crash event, the vehicle was rear-ended by an SUV, then crashed into the back of a passenger car. There were no allegations made related to the operation of the ADAS systems. However, upon obtaining and reviewing VCH and EDR data from the crash event, Toyota became aware that the vehicle was operating with ADAS L2 engagement in the moments leading up to the crash event. VCH provides an approximately 9 second pre-crash data recording, and EDR provides an approximately 4.8 second pre-crash data recording. Based on the data obtained, the following information was observed: Lane Trace Assist (LTA) was engaged during the recording until approximately 4 seconds prior to the crash event. Dynamic Radar Cruise Control (DRCC) was engaged during the recording until approximately 2.4 seconds prior to the crash event, at which point the PCS Alarm (FCW) was activated. The vehicle was traveling at approximately 70 MPH prior to applying the brakes. As a result of the crash incident, the vehicle was towed away from the scene. The owner alleged the vehicle's driver was experiencing, "back pain and headaches." This report is a 10-Day update. The original report ID is 1306-4427-1.
13781-4153 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 22:37Sacramento, CA2020 Tesla Model YADASOther Fixed ObjectUnknown21Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4155 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 02:28Los Angeles, CA2022 Tesla Model 3ADASPassenger CarUnknown42Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4156 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 06:26Midland, VA2020 Tesla Model YADASOther Fixed ObjectUnknown40Rural RoadRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4166 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 20:50Stevensville, MD2022 Tesla Model YADASUnknownUnknown1Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4181 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 23:08Princeton, TX2017 Tesla Model 3ADASSUVUnknown48Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4182 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 09:33Los Angeles, CA2019 Tesla Model 3ADASOther Fixed ObjectUnknown59Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4183 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 22:04Costa Mesa, CA2023 Tesla Model XADASPassenger CarUnknown7Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4184 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 23:10Houston, TX2021 Tesla Model SADASHeavy TruckUnknown48Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4185 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 23:32Grants Pass, OR2022 Tesla Model SADASUnknownUnknown16Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4186 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 09:13Phoenix, AZ2017 Tesla Model XADASOther Fixed ObjectUnknown22StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4187 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 12:20Austin, TX2018 Tesla Model XADASSUVUnknown32StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4188 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 20:50Daphne, AL2022 Tesla Model YADASHeavy TruckUnknown4Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4189 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 02:28Hawthorne, CA2020 Tesla Model YADASSUVUnknown21Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4190 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 15:29Houston, TX2021 Tesla Model YADASOther, see NarrativeUnknown22StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4191 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 13:11Fullerton, CA2020 Tesla Model 3ADASOther Fixed ObjectUnknown26Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4192 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 11:01Los Angeles, CA2022 Tesla Model 3ADASOther Fixed ObjectUnknown36Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4193 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 16:40San Bernardino, CA2022 Tesla Model 3ADASOther Fixed ObjectUnknown17Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4194 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 15:26Dos Palos, CA2021 Tesla Model YADASOther, see NarrativeUnknown29Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4195 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 23:08Marfa, TX2022 Tesla Model XADASPassenger CarUnknown33StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4196 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 03:21San Diego, CA2021 Tesla Model YADASOther Fixed ObjectUnknown28Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4197 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 10:06Vista, CA2020 Tesla Model YADASOther Fixed ObjectUnknown44Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4205 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 15:23San Diego, CA2021 Tesla Model 3ADASOther Fixed ObjectUnknown68Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4206 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 06:06Moscow, ID2018 Tesla Model 3ADASUnknownUnknown72UnknownRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4265 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 16:27Los Angeles, CA2021 Tesla Model 3ADASPassenger CarUnknown51Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4266 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 18:50Bethesda, MD2021 Tesla Model YADASOther Fixed ObjectUnknown74Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4279 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 22:04Fremont, CA2020 Tesla Model 3ADASHeavy TruckUnknown48Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4280 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 15:19Encinitas, CA2020 Tesla Model 3ADASSUVUnknown56Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4284 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 10:00Tinton Falls, NJ2021 Tesla Model YADASVanUnknown52Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4288 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 10:36West Islip, NY2022 Tesla Model 3ADASOther, see NarrativeUnknown67Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4289 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 19:29Fresno, CA2021 Tesla Model YADASOther Fixed ObjectUnknown64Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4290 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11Morrisdale, PA2022 Tesla Model SADASUnknownNo Injuries ReportedHighway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4293 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 13:20Maumee, OH2020 Tesla Model 3ADASFirst Responder VehicleUnknown15Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4296 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 13:20Maumee, OH2020 Tesla Model 3ADASFirst Responder VehicleUnknown15Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4297 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 10:37Norwalk, CA2021 Tesla Model 3ADASOther Fixed ObjectUnknown30IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4298 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 01:37East Palo Alto, CA2018 Tesla Model 3ADASPassenger CarUnknown26Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4299 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 16:23Houston, TX2021 Tesla Model YADASOther Fixed ObjectUnknown55Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4300 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 03:55West Palm Beach, FL2021 Tesla Model YADASOther Fixed ObjectUnknown46Traffic CircleRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4301 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 03:47Vancouver, WA2022 Tesla Model YADASUnknownUnknown19StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4302 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 23:18Los Angeles, CA2022 Tesla Model YADASPassenger CarUnknown53Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4304 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 00:52Irvine, CA2022 Tesla Model YADASOther Fixed ObjectUnknown63Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4327 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 16:22Commerce, CA2018 Tesla Model 3ADASPassenger CarUnknown18Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4328 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 05:40Culver City, CA2016 Tesla Model XADASUnknownUnknown46Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4333 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 07:08Clovis, CA2020 Tesla Model 3ADASOther, see NarrativeUnknown35StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4334 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 15:52Charlotte, NC2021 Tesla Model YADASOther, see NarrativeUnknown54Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4335 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 19:32Irvine, CA2021 Tesla Model 3ADASSUVUnknown35StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4336 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 00:47Colorado Springs, CO2021 Tesla Model YADASPassenger CarUnknown24StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4337 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 21:54Milpitas, CA2020 Tesla Model 3ADASPassenger CarUnknown46StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4338 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 20:39San Francisco, CA2021 Tesla Model SADASPassenger CarUnknown7Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4340 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 05:31Orlando, FL2018 Tesla Model XADASSUVUnknown45IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-4341 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-11 09:41Metairie, LA2022 Tesla Model YADASUnknownUnknown53Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30270-4482ADSWaymo LLC2022-11 16:30San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSSUVNo Injuries Reported2Street
On November [XXX], 2022 at 4:30 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a parked SUV near [XXX]. While reversing in manual on a narrow road, the fr…On November [XXX], 2022 at 4:30 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a parked SUV near [XXX]. While reversing in manual on a narrow road, the front right radar of the Waymo AV made contact with the taillight of a parked SUV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was not engaged and a test driver was operating the Waymo AV in manual mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-4484ADSWaymo LLC2022-11 08:48Phoenix, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSHeavy TruckNo Injuries Reported0Street
On November [XXX], 2022 at 8:48 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a garbage truck on the 500 block of [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling eastbound on […On November [XXX], 2022 at 8:48 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a garbage truck on the 500 block of [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling eastbound on [XXX] when it encountered a stopped garbage truck traveling westbound. The Waymo AV pulled to the right side of the street and stopped, unable to proceed past the garbage truck and an SUV parked parallel to the curb. The garbage truck then attempted to pass between the Waymo AV and a parked passenger vehicle to the right of the garbage truck, and the garbage truck made contact with the left rear corner of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode and the Waymo AV was stationary. The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-4485ADSWaymo LLC2022-11 09:34San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On November [XXX], 2022 at 9:34 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped in traffic on n…On November [XXX], 2022 at 9:34 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped in traffic on northbound [XXX] in autonomous mode. A passenger car that had been stopped behind the Waymo AV passed on the left side, crossing the double yellow line and making contact with the Waymo AVs rear left sensor housing. The passenger car immediately left the scene. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the drivers seating position). The Waymo AV sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30413-4170ADSMay Mobility2022-11 15:43Ann Arbor, MI2020 Lexus RX450HUnknown, see NarrativeNon-Motorist: CyclistNo Injuries Reported4Intersection
Operator was approaching stop sign at the intersection of [XXX] westbound and [XXX] northbound, which is a planned disengagement (this unprotected turn is outside of our ODD). If left in autonomy, the vehicle would have …Operator was approaching stop sign at the intersection of [XXX] westbound and [XXX] northbound, which is a planned disengagement (this unprotected turn is outside of our ODD). If left in autonomy, the vehicle would have come to a full stop before the stop line and remained stopped until the operator took over. 6 seconds prior to incident, operator took the vehicle over manually before it could have stopped in autonomy. Operator moved the vehicle manually passed the stop line, colliding with a bicyclist's back tire. No injuries reported from the bicyclist or the operator and no damage to the vehicle or bicycle.
30531-4492 v2ADSTransdev Alternative Services2022-11 16:30San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSSUVNo Injuries Reported2Street
Corrected the latitude and longitude. Nothing else was updated. On November [XXX], 2022 at 4:30 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a parked SU…Corrected the latitude and longitude. Nothing else was updated. On November [XXX], 2022 at 4:30 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a parked SUV near [XXX]. While reversing in manual on a narrow road, the front right radar of the Waymo AV made contact with the taillight of a parked SUV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was not engaged and a test driver was operating the Waymo AV in manual mode. Both vehicles sustained damage. Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Transdev may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This report is a duplicate of WaymoLLC-20221103-0 (rev.20221215142403).
30531-4494ADSTransdev Alternative Services2022-11 9:34San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Intersection
On November [XXX], 2022 at 9:34 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped in traffic on n…On November [XXX], 2022 at 9:34 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped in traffic on northbound [XXX] in autonomous mode. A passenger car that had been stopped behind the Waymo AV passed on the left side, crossing the double yellow line and making contact with the Waymo AVs rear left sensor housing. The passenger car immediately left the scene. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the drivers seating position). The Waymo AV sustained damage. Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Transdev may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This is a duplicate of report WaymoLLC-20221108-0 (rev.20221215145119).

What this table is and is not. Rows are the operators' own filings, not verified cases, and a filing does not establish fault. NHTSA redacts most Level 2 narratives as confidential business information, so the text column is empty for most Tesla rows; the structured columns are not redacted. The table joins NHTSA's current files (incidents from June 2025, after the third amended order) with its 2021-2025 archive, which used an older layout: severity labels, roadway and weather fields differ between the two sets, and the source_set column in the CSV says which one a row came from. Level 2 reports are shown here because the file contains them, but they are not cases in the register, which counts a vehicle as a robot only when nobody inside is responsible for driving. Source: NHTSA SGO 2021-01. The themed reading of the driverless narratives is on the reports page.