The MachineRecord
NHTSA Standing General Order 2021-01

The SGO file, in a form you can search

NHTSA publishes the crash reports as three CSV files of 116 columns each, with several versions of the same report mixed in. This is the same data as one table: driverless systems (ADS) and Level 2 driver assistance side by side, 2021 to today including NHTSA's archive, one row per report at its latest version, every row traceable to its NHTSA report number. Free, CC BY 4.0, refreshed from NHTSA on every pipeline run.

Reports
8612
Fatal
87
Of them Level 2
79
Reporting entities
64
Incidents
2019-08 to 2026-09

8612 reports, showing 7701 to 7800.

Report IDProgramEntityIncidentPlaceVehicleEngagedCrash withSeveritySpeed, mphRoadwayNarrative
502-3744 v2Level 2Ford Motor Company2022-08 17:00Bloomington, MN2022 Ford ExpeditionADASSUVMinor0Highway / Freeway
10-Day Update on report 502-3744-1 (reported on Sept [XXX], 2022): Ford has received and updated information on the Incident Scene: Coordinates, Surface Condition, Speed Limit and Weather, and vehicle Mileage. 1-Day (…10-Day Update on report 502-3744-1 (reported on Sept [XXX], 2022): Ford has received and updated information on the Incident Scene: Coordinates, Surface Condition, Speed Limit and Weather, and vehicle Mileage. 1-Day (report# 502-3744-1) Narrative: This SGO Report is the official Portal submission emailed to NHTSA on Sept [XXX], 2022, during that time the NHTSA SGO Portal was undergoing maintenance. The driver reported to Ford that they were traveling South on [XXX] while using Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) and Lane Centering Assist (LCA), during traffic congestion the Ford driver applied the brakes and came to a complete stop. The Jeep Wrangler directly behind failed to stop and impacted the right rear of the Ford vehicle, within 30 seconds of Ford vehicle ADAS Level 2 feature deactivation due to brake application. The Jeep suffered front end damage and was towed, and the passenger was taken to the hospital for minor injuries.
502-3864ADSFord Motor Company2022-08 17:55Miami Beach, FL2020 Ford EscapeADSPickup TruckNo Injuries Reported0StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
502-3866ADSFord Motor Company2022-08 12:31Miami, FL2020 Ford EscapeADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
540-3819ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2022-08 07:04San Francisco, CA2020 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported14Street
On September [XXX], 2022, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cru…On September [XXX], 2022, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-3801-1)
540-3820ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2022-08 03:53San Francisco, CA2020 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarMinor0Street
On September [XXX], 2022, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cru…On September [XXX], 2022, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-3806-1)
988-3684 v2ADSPACCAR Incorporated2022-08 18:00Palmer, TX2022 Kenworth T680ADSPickup TruckNo Injuries Reported15Highway / Freeway
Monthly Report Update: A police report was issued after the original SGO incident reports were submitted and described the cause of the collision as the pick-up truck's failure to control its speed before rear-ending the…Monthly Report Update: A police report was issued after the original SGO incident reports were submitted and described the cause of the collision as the pick-up truck's failure to control its speed before rear-ending the Kodiak AV. The content of this report is otherwise unchanged from the initial incident report submitted on August [XXX], 2022. On August [XXX], 2022, Kodiak Robotics, Inc. ("Kodiak") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 (the "Order"). PACCAR, Inc. (Paccar) manufactured the Kodiak-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because Paccar is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, Paccar is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. Paccar has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" field solely to avoid the second submission of nonpublic Kodiak CBI. Paccar is in possession of Kodiak's response to this field and incorporates Kodiak's response into this submission by reference. Paccar's submission is based on facts supplied to Paccar by Kodiak. Paccar has not investigated the alleged incident and has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report.
12381-3438 v2ADSDaimler Trucks North America, LLC2022-07 16:33ALBUQUERQUE, NM2021 FREIGHTLINER CascadiaADSOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries Reported58Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
12381-3536 v2Level 2Daimler Trucks North America, LLC2022-07 03:00Keokuk, IA2022 Freightliner CascadiaADASOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries ReportedHighway / Freeway
On August [XXX], 2022, Daimler Truck was notified of an alleged fire on the rear of the trailer in a 2022 Freightliner Cascadia, that occurred after the vehicle was leaving a repair facility. The incident was alleged to…On August [XXX], 2022, Daimler Truck was notified of an alleged fire on the rear of the trailer in a 2022 Freightliner Cascadia, that occurred after the vehicle was leaving a repair facility. The incident was alleged to happen somewhere on the [XXX] in Keokuk, Iowa. The vehicle has a Detroit Assurance 5.0 system and would have had to have been towed from the incident, so even though we have no allegation that implicates the ADAS system, we are reporting this out of an abundance of caution.
12381-3557ADSDaimler Trucks North America, LLC2022-07 12:39Santa Rosa, NM2021 Freightliner CascadiaADSOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries Reported51Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
1243-3577 v3Level 2Subaru of America, Inc.2022-07 08:00WV2020 Subaru OutbackADASPole / TreeMinor40UnknownRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
1243-3681 v4Level 2Subaru of America, Inc.2022-07 15:13Mamaroneck, NY2020 Subaru ForesterADASOther Fixed ObjectNo Injuries Reported55Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
1306-3711 v3Level 2Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing2022-07 02:59Goldsboro, NC2021 Toyota CorollaADASUnknownUnknown89Highway / Freeway
On August [XXX], 2022 Toyota received a field report related to this crash. The vehicle was reportedly traveling east on [XXX], when it approached a vehicle travelling the wrong way on the road operated by a drunk driver…On August [XXX], 2022 Toyota received a field report related to this crash. The vehicle was reportedly traveling east on [XXX], when it approached a vehicle travelling the wrong way on the road operated by a drunk driver. The Toyota Corolla driver alleged that they attempted to swerve right to miss the oncoming vehicle, but collided with the vehicle on the driver side. As a result of the collision, the Toyota Corolla allegedly rolled over, landed on its wheels, and contacted a highway barrier. Toyota obtained Vehicle Control History (VCH) and Event Data Recorder (EDR) data from the subject vehicle. VCH provides an approximately 8 second pre-crash data recording, and EDR provides an approximately 4.80 second pre-crash data recording. Based on the data obtained, the following information was observed: Lane Trace Assist (LTA) was engaged during the recording until approximately 6.7 seconds prior to the crash event and Dynamic Radar Cruise Control (DRCC) was engaged during the recording until approximately 5.5 seconds prior to the crash event. ADAS L2 was disengaged approximately 6.7 seconds prior to the crash due to driver steering input exceeding the steering torque override threshold of LTA. The vehicle was traveling at approximately 89 MPH prior to the crash event. As a result of the crash incident, the subject vehicle was towed away from the scene. Injuries to occupants of the subject vehicle were described by the owner as: Driver: Cerebral fluid leaking from nose, Concussion, whiplash, backpain Front Passenger: No injuries reported. This report is a Monthly Update. The original report ID is 1306-3711-1.
1306-3729 v3Level 2Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing2022-07 20:29Catonsville, MD2022 Toyota RAV4 HVUnknown, see NarrativeUnknownNo Injuries Reported9Highway / Freeway
On August [XXX], 2022 Toyota completed a field report related to this crash. The vehicle was reportedly traveling east on [XXX], when it is alleged that it experienced a "loss of stability control" and "swerving back and…On August [XXX], 2022 Toyota completed a field report related to this crash. The vehicle was reportedly traveling east on [XXX], when it is alleged that it experienced a "loss of stability control" and "swerving back and forth" condition, forcing the driver to slow his vehicle. The driver alleged that he brought the vehicle to a stop, and approximately 5 seconds later another vehicle struck the subject vehicle in a rear-end collision. Toyota obtained Vehicle Control History (VCH) and Event Data Recorder (EDR) data from the subject vehicle. VCH provides an approximately 7.5 second pre-crash data recording, and EDR provides an approximately 5 second pre-crash data recording. Based on further analysis of the data obtained, the following information was observed: Dynamic Radar Cruise Control (DRCC) and Lane Trace Assist (LTA) were not engaged during the recording. The vehicle was traveling at approximately 53 MPH prior to applying the brakes. The vehicle was impacted in the rear when it was travelling at approximately 9 MPH. The driver's seat belt status was "OFF" (not buckled). As a result of the crash incident, the subject vehicle was towed away from the scene. This report is a Monthly update. The original report ID is 1306-3729-1.
13781-10625Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 01:21Chicago, IL2021 Tesla Model YADASUnknownUnknown24UnknownRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3298 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 21:30Sacaton, AZ2022 Tesla Model 3ADASUnknownUnknown61Rural RoadRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3299 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 11:42Blue Springs, MO2020 Tesla Model YADASUnknownUnknownUnknownRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3300 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 21:43DuPont, WA2021 Tesla Model 3ADASPassenger CarUnknown78Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3301 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 11:46Santa Monica, CA2021 Tesla Model 3ADASOther Fixed ObjectUnknown20IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3302 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 12:10Miami, FL2021 Tesla Model YADASOther Fixed ObjectUnknown29Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3303 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 06:50Brussels, WI2020 Tesla Model 3ADASAnimalUnknown70Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3304 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 06:28Weverton, MD2019 Tesla Model 3ADASAnimalUnknown73Rural RoadRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3305 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 08:42West Hill, PA2014 Tesla Model SADASUnknownUnknown71UnknownRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3306 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 05:27Gallatin, TN2020 Tesla Model 3ADASOther, see NarrativeUnknown65Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3317 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 17:51Desert Hot Springs, CA2022 Tesla Model 3ADASPassenger CarUnknown41IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3318 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 18:18Emeryville, CA2020 Tesla Model YADASPassenger CarUnknown18Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3325Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 23:52Norcross, GA2019 Tesla Model 3ADASUnknownUnknownUnknownRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3327 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 17:57Gainesville, FL2015 Tesla Model SADASHeavy TruckFatality64Parking LotRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3331 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 00:51New Hope, AZ2020 Tesla Model YADASUnknownUnknown65Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3332 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 11:46Riverside, CA2021 Tesla Model YADASMotorcycleFatalityHighway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3333 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 14:50Los Angeles, CA2021 Tesla Model YADASVanUnknown63Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3334 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 04:35Fort McDowell, AZ2016 Tesla Model SADASUnknownUnknown62Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3358 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 02:25Woodbridge, MD2020 Tesla Model 3ADASPickup TruckUnknown54Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3359 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 23:00Stockton, CA2021 Tesla Model YADASOther Fixed ObjectUnknown62Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3360 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 07:26Atlanta, GA2022 Tesla Model 3ADASPassenger CarUnknown60Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3361 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 22:07Fairhope, AL2020 Tesla Model 3ADASSUVUnknown25IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3362 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 14:04Chicago, IL2015 Tesla Model SADASUnknownUnknown23UnknownRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3363 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 02:50Marietta, GA2021 Tesla Model YADASOther Fixed ObjectUnknown14Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3365 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 01:03Los Angeles, CA2021 Tesla Model 3ADASOther Fixed ObjectUnknown80Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3366 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 21:16Dallas, TX2018 Tesla Model SADASPickup TruckUnknown45Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3390 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 20:55Silver Lake, WI2020 Tesla Model XADASUnknownUnknown62UnknownRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3424 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 22:58Los Angeles, CA2020 Tesla Model 3ADASPassenger CarUnknown35Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3425 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 17:06Irondale, AL2019 Tesla Model 3ADASOther Fixed ObjectUnknown47Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3449 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07Naperville, IL2018 Tesla Model 3ADASUnknownUnknown47StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3457 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 21:51Long Beach, CA2019 Tesla Model 3ADASPassenger CarUnknown59Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3458 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 21:27Atwater, CA2021 Tesla Model YADASPassenger CarUnknown20Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3459 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 09:47Freedom Township, OH2020 Tesla Model YADASUnknownUnknown35Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3460 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 14:28Sausalito, CA2021 Tesla Model 3ADASOther Fixed ObjectUnknown96Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3461 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 11:24South Riding, VA2020 Tesla Model 3ADASUnknownUnknown52Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3462 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 05:40San Ygnacio, TX2021 Tesla Model 3ADASPole / TreeUnknown65Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3463 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 04:21Land O' Lakes, FL2020 Tesla Model 3ADASUnknownUnknown34Rural RoadRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3467 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 15:43Upton, KY2021 Tesla Model YADASOther Fixed ObjectUnknown53Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3468 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 22:14Falmouth, VA2016 Tesla Model SADASUnknownUnknown60Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3469 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 00:28Afton, NY2021 Tesla Model 3ADASUnknownUnknown74Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3480 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 00:47Avondale, AZ2015 Tesla Model SADASUnknownUnknown40Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3485 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 04:20UNK2018 Tesla Model SADASOther Fixed ObjectUnknownHighway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3488 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 07:08Bluffdale, UT2020 Tesla Model 3ADASMotorcycleFatality61Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3489 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 18:58Pleasant Hill, CA2018 Tesla Model XADASUnknownUnknown79Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3490 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 20:54Athens, NY2016 Tesla Model SADASUnknownUnknown55UnknownRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3506 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 14:47Diamond Bar, CA2016 Tesla Model XADASUnknownUnknown51Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3509 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 14:52Orlando, FL2019 Tesla Model 3ADASOther Fixed ObjectUnknown70Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3510 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 21:29Creola, AL2021 Tesla Model YADASUnknownUnknown78Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3511 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 13:01Dallas, TX2021 Tesla Model 3ADASPickup TruckUnknown44Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3512 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 09:14Camarillo, CA2020 Tesla Model 3ADASUnknownUnknown34UnknownRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3517 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 19:29Sandia Park, NM2019 Tesla Model 3ADASSUVUnknown20Rural RoadRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
13781-3518 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-07 09:36Dallas, TX2017 Tesla Model XADASFirst Responder VehicleUnknown15Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
28349-3493 v4Level 2Lucid USA, Inc.2022-07 03:58Belmont, CA2022 Lucid DreamADASPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported70Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30270-3323 v2ADSWaymo LLC2022-07 15:26San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported3Intersection
The content of this report is unchanged from the initial report submitted on July [XXX], 2022 [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION]. On July [XXX], 2022 at 3:26 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Way…The content of this report is unchanged from the initial report submitted on July [XXX], 2022 [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION]. On July [XXX], 2022 at 3:26 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, CA was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling westbound on [XXX] when it detected a siren from a nearby emergency vehicle. As the Waymo AV slowed, a passenger vehicle made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the drivers seating position). Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This report was submitted from the Eastern time zone on the required date.
30270-3324 v2ADSWaymo LLC2022-07 00:57Tempe, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSOther, see NarrativeUnknown0Street
The content of this report is unchanged from the initial report submitted on July [XXX] 2022 [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION]. On July [XXX], 2022 at 12:57 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Wa…The content of this report is unchanged from the initial report submitted on July [XXX] 2022 [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION]. On July [XXX], 2022 at 12:57 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") was traveling eastbound on [XXX] in autonomous mode when a pedestrian entered the roadway from the center median. The test driver then disengaged autonomous mode and braked to a stop as the pedestrian began to run toward the Waymo AV. The pedestrian stood in front of the vehicle, then jumped onto the hood of the Waymo AV and used their body to break the Waymo AV's windshield. The pedestrian was apprehended soon after by nearby police. The Waymo AV test driver was not physically injured but was taken to a nearby hospital out of an abundance of caution. The Waymo AV sustained major damage to its windshield. Waymo is reporting this event to ensure official notification to the agency of a notable event. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available.
30270-3338 v2ADSWaymo LLC2022-07 09:04Phoenix, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarMinor13Intersection
The content of this report is unchanged from the initial report submitted on July [XXX] 2022 [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION]. On July [XXX], 2022 at 9:04 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waym…The content of this report is unchanged from the initial report submitted on July [XXX] 2022 [REDACTED, MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION]. On July [XXX], 2022 at 9:04 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle on [XXX] and [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX] in autonomous mode and turning left onto eastbound [XXX]. As the Waymo AV initiated the left turn, a passenger vehicle that had been following the Waymo AV made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the drivers seating position). Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away and the Waymo AV test driver reported minor injuries. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This report was submitted from the Eastern time zone on the required date.
30270-3625ADSWaymo LLC2022-07 10:08San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSVanNo Injuries Reported0Parking Lot
On July [XXX], 2022 at 10:08 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a van in a parking lot near [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV came to a stop whil…On July [XXX], 2022 at 10:08 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle ("Waymo AV") operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a van in a parking lot near [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV came to a stop while yielding for an oncoming van in a narrow passageway in a parking lot. While attempting to pass the Waymo AV, the van made contact with the sensor housing on the left rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was stationary and engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the driver's seating position). Both vehicles sustained minor damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This report was submitted from the Eastern time zone on the required date.
30270-3628ADSWaymo LLC2022-07 06:54San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarMinor0Intersection
On July [XXX], 2022 at 6:54 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on the [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped in the dedicat…On July [XXX], 2022 at 6:54 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on the [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped in the dedicated left turn lane facing north on the [XXX], awaiting a green signal for a protected left turn onto [XXX]. The signal for traffic proceeding north on the [XXX] turned green, and traffic in adjacent lanes began moving. The left turn arrow signal for the dedicated turn lane occupied by the Waymo AV remained red. The passenger car that had been stopped directly behind the Waymo AV began moving forward. The front of the passenger car made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV, immediately after which the passenger car left the scene. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the drivers seating position). The Waymo AV sustained minor damage and the Waymo AV test driver reported lower back pain. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This report was submitted from the Eastern time zone on the required date.
30270-3633ADSWaymo LLC2022-07 23:23San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported9Street
On July [XXX], 2022 at 11:23 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling north on [XXX] i…On July [XXX], 2022 at 11:23 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling north on [XXX] in the rightmost lane when a passenger car approached the Waymo AV from behind on the left. Just after passing the Waymo AV, the passenger car veered across the path of the Waymo AV into the entrance of a gas station on the right hand side of the roadway. The right rear corner of the passenger vehicle made contact with the front left corner of the Waymo AV, immediately after which the passenger car left the scene. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was not engaged and a test driver was operating the Waymo AV in manual mode. The Waymo AV sustained minor damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This report was submitted from the Eastern time zone on the required date.
30270-3635ADSWaymo LLC2022-07 02:50San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported12Intersection
On July [XXX], 2022 at 2:18 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling west on [XXX] and…On July [XXX], 2022 at 2:18 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling west on [XXX] and preparing to make a left turn onto [XXX] to travel south. A passenger car passed the Waymo AV and the vehicle directly behind the Waymo AV by crossing into and driving in the opposing lane of traffic. As the passenger vehicle passed the Waymo on the left, the right side of the passenger vehicle made contact with the front left corner of the Waymo AV, immediately after which the passenger car left the scene. At the time of impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was not engaged and a test driver was operating the Waymo AV in manual mode. The Waymo AV sustained minor damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This report was submitted from the Eastern time zone on the required date.
30270-3636ADSWaymo LLC2022-07 02:50Tempe, AZ2017 Chrysler PacificaADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Parking Lot
On July [XXX], 2022 at 2:50 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle in a parking lot at the corner of [XXX] and [XXX]. The Waymo AV was st…On July [XXX], 2022 at 2:50 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle in a parking lot at the corner of [XXX] and [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped to pick up a passenger when a passenger vehicle, parked perpendicular and to the right of the Waymo AV, reversed out of a parking spot. The rear of the passenger vehicle made contact with the front passenger side corner of the Waymo AV as the passenger was closing the door on the driver side of the Waymo AV prior to fastening their seat belt. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the drivers seating position). Both vehicles sustained damage. Waymo is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Waymo may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This report was submitted from the Eastern time zone on the required date.
30330-3482 v2ADSTORC Robotics, Inc.2022-07 16:33ALBUQUERQUE, NM2021 FREIGHTLINER CASCADIAADSOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries Reported58Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30330-3561ADSTORC Robotics, Inc.2022-07 12:39Santa Rosa, NM2021 FREIGHTLINER CASCADIAADSOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries Reported51Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-3580ADSCruise LLC2022-07 2:57San Francisco, CA2022 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-3581ADSCruise LLC2022-07 22:46San Francisco, CA2020 Cruise AVADSSUVNo Injuries Reported6IntersectionRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-3582ADSCruise LLC2022-07 1:39San Francisco, CA2020 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported12StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30412-3584ADSCruise LLC2022-07 00:27San Francisco, CA2020 Cruise AVADSOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries Reported0StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
30531-3328 v2OTHERTransdev Alternative Services2022-07 15:26San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceUnknown, see NarrativePassenger CarNo Injuries Reported3Intersection
The content of this report is unchanged from the initial report submitted. On July [XXX], 2022 at 3:26 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, CA was in a collision involving a passenger …The content of this report is unchanged from the initial report submitted. On July [XXX], 2022 at 3:26 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, CA was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling westbound on [XXX] when it detected a siren from a nearby emergency vehicle. As the Waymo AV slowed, a passenger vehicle made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the drivers seating position). Both vehicles sustained damage. Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away. Transdev may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This report is a duplicate to the report submitted by Waymo LLC WaymoLLC-[XXX].
30531-3329 v2OTHERTransdev Alternative Services2022-07 00:57Tempe, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceUnknown, see NarrativeOther, see NarrativeUnknown0Street
The content of this report is unchanged from the initial report submitted. On July [XXX], 2022 at 12:57 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) was traveling eastbound on [XXX] in autonomous mode when a pedestrian e…The content of this report is unchanged from the initial report submitted. On July [XXX], 2022 at 12:57 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) was traveling eastbound on [XXX] in autonomous mode when a pedestrian entered the roadway from the center median. The test driver then disengaged autonomous mode and braked to a stop as the pedestrian began to run toward the Waymo AV. The pedestrian stood in front of the vehicle, then jumped onto the hood of the Waymo AV and used their body to break the Waymo AVs windshield. The pedestrian was apprehended soon after by nearby police. The Waymo AV test driver was not physically injured but was taken to a nearby hospital out of an abundance of caution. The Waymo AV sustained major damage to its windshield. Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this event to ensure official notification to the agency of a notable event. Transdev may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This report is a duplicate to WaymoLLC-[XXX].
30531-3342 v2ADSTransdev Alternative Services2022-07 9:04Phoenix, AZ2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarMinor13Intersection
The content of this report is unchanged from the original report. On July [XXX], 2022 at 9:04 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle on…The content of this report is unchanged from the original report. On July [XXX], 2022 at 9:04 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in Phoenix, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle on [XXX] and [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling southbound on [XXX] in autonomous mode and turning left onto eastbound [XXX]. As the Waymo AV initiated the left turn, a passenger vehicle that had been following the Waymo AV made contact with the rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AVs Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the drivers seating position). Both vehicles sustained damage. Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this crash under Request No. 1 of Standing General Order 2021-01 because a vehicle involved was towed away and the Waymo AV test driver reported minor injuries. Transdev may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This report is a duplicate of WaymoLLC-[XXX].
30531-3661ADSTransdev Alternative Services2022-07 02:50Tempe, AZ2017 Chrysler PacificaADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Parking Lot
On July [XXX], 2022 at 2:50 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehice ("Waymo AV") operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle in a parking lot at the corner of [XXX] and [XXX]. The Waymo AV was s…On July [XXX], 2022 at 2:50 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehice ("Waymo AV") operating in Tempe, Arizona was in a collision involving a passenger vehicle in a parking lot at the corner of [XXX] and [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped to pick up a passenger when a passenger vehicle, parked perpendicular and to the right of the Waymo AV, reversed out of a parking spot. The rear of the passenger vehicle made contact with the front passenger side corner of the Waymo AV as the passenger was closing the door on the driver side of the Waymo AV prior to fastening their seat belt. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the driver's seating position). Both vehicles sustained damage. Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Transdev may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This report is a duplicate of 30270-3636-1.
30531-3662ADSTransdev Alternative Services2022-07 02:50San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported12Intersection
On July [XXX], 2022 at 2:18 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling west on [XXX] and…On July [XXX], 2022 at 2:18 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling west on [XXX] and preparing to make a left turn onto [XXX] to travel south. A passenger car passed the Waymo AV and the vehicle directly behind the Waymo AV by crossing into and driving in the opposing lane of traffic. As the passenger vehicle passed the Waymo on the left, the right side of the passenger vehicle made contact with the front left corner of the Waymo AV, immediately after which the passenger car left the scene. At the time of impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was not engaged and a test driver was operating the Waymo AV in manual mode. The Waymo AV sustained minor damage. Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Transdev may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This report is a duplicate of 30270-3635-1.
30531-3663ADSTransdev Alternative Services2022-07 23:23San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported9Street
On July [XXX], 2022 at 11:23 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling north on [XXX] i…On July [XXX], 2022 at 11:23 PM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was traveling north on [XXX] in the rightmost lane when a passenger car approached the Waymo AV from behind on the left. Just after passing the Waymo AV, the passenger car veered across the path of the Waymo AV into the entrance of a gas station on the right hand side of the roadway. The right rear corner of the passenger vehicle made contact with the front left corner of the Waymo AV, immediately after which the passenger car left the scene. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was not engaged and a test driver was operating the Waymo AV in manual mode. The Waymo AV sustained minor damage. Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Transdev may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This report is a duplicate of 30270-3633-1.
30531-3664ADSTransdev Alternative Services2022-07 06:54San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSPassenger CarMinor0Intersection
On July [XXX], 2022 at 6:54 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehice (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on the [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped in the dedicated…On July [XXX], 2022 at 6:54 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehice (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a passenger car on the [XXX] at [XXX]. The Waymo AV was stopped in the dedicated left turn lane facing north on the [XXX], awaiting a green signal for a protected left turn onto [XXX]. The signal for traffic proceeding north on the [XXX] turned green, and traffic in adjacent lanes began moving. The left turn arrow signal for the dedicated turn lane occupied by the Waymo AV remained red. The passenger car that had been stopped immediately after which the passenger car left the scene. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the driver's seating position). The Waymo AV sustained minor damage and the Waymo AV test driver reported lower back pain. Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Transdev may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This report is a duplicate of 30270-3628-1.
30531-3665ADSTransdev Alternative Services2022-07 10:08San Francisco, CA2021 Jaguar I-PaceADSVanNo Injuries Reported0Parking Lot
On July [XXX], 2022 at 10:08 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a van in a parking lot near [XXX] at [XXX]t. The Waymo AV came to a stop while…On July [XXX], 2022 at 10:08 AM PST a Waymo Autonomous Vehicle (Waymo AV) operating in San Francisco, California was in a collision involving a van in a parking lot near [XXX] at [XXX]t. The Waymo AV came to a stop while yielding for an oncoming van in a narrow passageway in a parking lot. While attempting to pass the Waymo AV, the van made contact with the sensor housing on the left rear of the Waymo AV. At the time of the impact, the Waymo AV's Level 4 ADS was stationary and engaged in autonomous mode, and a test driver was present (in the driver's seating position). Both vehicles sustained minor damage. Transdev Alternative Services is reporting this crash under Request No. 2 of Standing General Order 2021-01. Transdev may supplement or correct its reporting with additional information as it may become available. This report is a duplicate of 30270-3625-1.
30610-3508 v2ADSZoox, Inc.2022-07 14:30San Francisco, CA2016 Toyota HighlanderADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported1Intersection
A Zoox vehicle in autonomy was proceeding straight on [XXX] in San Francisco, Ca when a passenger vehicle turning left from [XXX] on to [XXX] struck the rear of the Zoox vehicle damaging the sensors. There were no injuri…A Zoox vehicle in autonomy was proceeding straight on [XXX] in San Francisco, Ca when a passenger vehicle turning left from [XXX] on to [XXX] struck the rear of the Zoox vehicle damaging the sensors. There were no injuries and the police were not called. Zoox is submitting this updated report to correct a previous reporting error in the HIGHEST INJURY SEVERITY field.
540-3643ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2022-07 2:57San Francisco, CA2022 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported0Street
On August [XXX], 2022 GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-…On August [XXX], 2022 GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-3580-1)
540-3644ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2022-07 22:46San Francisco, CA2020 Cruise AVADSSUVNo Injuries Reported6Intersection
On August [XXX, 2022, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-…On August [XXX, 2022, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-3581-1)
540-3645ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2022-07 1:39San Francisco, CA2020 Cruise AVADSPassenger CarNo Injuries Reported12Street
On August [XXX], 2022, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise…On August [XXX], 2022, GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-3582-1)
540-3647ADSGeneral Motors, LLC2022-07 00:27San Francisco, CA2020 Cruise AVADSOther, see NarrativeNo Injuries Reported0Street
On August [XXX], GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-opera…On August [XXX], GM Cruise Holdings LLC ("Cruise") filed an Incident Report (the "Report") under the Standing General Order 2021-01 dated June 29, 2021 (the "Order"). General Motors LLC (GM) manufactured the Cruise-operated motor vehicle involved in the incident summarized in the Incident Report. Because GM is also a Reporting Entity under the Order, GM is submitting a duplicate of the redacted public copy of the Report. GM has selected "Unknown" in the "ADS version" and "ODD time" fields solely to avoid a second submission of nonpublic Cruise CBI GM is in possession of Cruise's responses to these fields, and incorporates Cruise's responses into this submission by reference. GM's submission is based on facts supplied to GM by Cruise. GM has not investigated the alleged incident and currently believes, based on a reasonable inquiry, that it has no independent knowledge of the facts in the Report. (Reference file: 30412-3584-1)
62-3538Level 2Honda (American Honda Motor Co.)2022-07Chicago, IL2020 Honda CivicUnknown, see NarrativePickup TruckNo Injuries ReportedHighway / FreewayThe customer reported that a speeding truck rear-ended him while driving on a highway. The customer alleges that the Lane Keep Assist System and Adaptive Cruise Control were engaged.
945-3951 v2Level 2Nissan North America, Inc.2022-07 17:00UNK2021 Nissan Rogue SVADASOther Fixed ObjectMinor45Unknown
8/[XXX]/2022: The customer called Consumer Affairs to report an incident on 7/[XXX]/2022. The customer alleged an "autopilot malfunction" caused the vehicle to move to the opposite side of traffic flow and hit two curves…8/[XXX]/2022: The customer called Consumer Affairs to report an incident on 7/[XXX]/2022. The customer alleged an "autopilot malfunction" caused the vehicle to move to the opposite side of traffic flow and hit two curves. There was no report of transport to a hospital for medical treatment, fatality, vehicle tow-away, air bag deployment, or vulnerable road user. Customer refused to respond to additional questions to schedule an inspection and terminated the call. 9/[XXX]/2022: The customer called Consumer Affairs alleging that while traveling 45-47 mph she attempted to disengage "autopilot" by pressing the brake in order to make a left turn. The speed was not reduced and the vehicle traveled to the left side of the road in the oncoming lane and hit the curb with the left side of the vehicle. There was no report of transport to a hospital for medical treatment, fatality, vehicle tow-away, air bag deployment, or vulnerable road user. 10/[XXX]/2022: The customer was called by Consumer Affairs to discuss a vehicle inspection. During the call, she reported the vehicle hit some items on the side of the road, the wheels were bent, and the driver's door would not open properly. The customer reported that the vehicle was towed and that repairs are close to being completed. In addition, she reported that although she was not injured, she went to the doctor and hospital for exacerbation of pre-existing conditions. 10/[XXX]/2022 Update: On October [XXX], 2022, Nissan inspected the vehicle at an independent repair facility, which is the location that the customer had the vehicle directly towed to after the incident. From pictures provided by the repair facility, Nissan identified possible damage to the center of the vehicle's left front wheel, a broken lower front control arm, a bent tie rod end, and the strut. No other incident-related body damage is visible in the photographs. The photos appear to show that the vehicle experienced a localized impact to the wheel, which generated force into in the location of the lower control arm. During Nissan's in-person inspection of the vehicle, the vehicle repairs were near completion. In particular, the left front wheel was not available to Nissan at the time of inspection. Vehicle mileage at the time of inspection was 14,326. No data retrieval or ECU resets were performed by Nissan. As of this report, the vehicle has not been taken to a Nissan dealer. Based on the photos reviewed and Nissan's inspection, the localized impact was insufficient to trigger an EDR recordable event. Therefore, Nissan is unable to determine customer inputs to the vehicle at the time of the incident. Separately, no event was recorded within the PPA system, indicating that PPA was not active at the time of the event.
945-4252Level 2Nissan North America, Inc.2022-07 17:00Grovetown, GA2021 Nissan Rogue SVADASOther Fixed ObjectMinor45Unknown
8/[XXX]/2022: The customer called Consumer Affairs to report an incident on 7/[XXX]/2022. The customer alleged an autopilot malfunction caused the vehicle to move to the opposite side of traffic flow and hit two curves. …8/[XXX]/2022: The customer called Consumer Affairs to report an incident on 7/[XXX]/2022. The customer alleged an autopilot malfunction caused the vehicle to move to the opposite side of traffic flow and hit two curves. There was no report of transport to a hospital for medical treatment, fatality, vehicle tow-away, air bag deployment, or vulnerable road user. Customer refused to respond to additional questions to schedule an inspection and terminated the call. 9/[XXX]/2022: The customer called Consumer Affairs alleging that while traveling 45-47 mph she attempted to disengage autopilot by pressing the brake in order to make a left turn. The speed was not reduced and the vehicle traveled to the left side of the road in the oncoming lane and hit the curb with the left side of the vehicle. There was no report of transport to a hospital for medical treatment, fatality, vehicle tow-away, air bag deployment, or vulnerable road user. 10/[XXX]/2022: The customer was called by Consumer Affairs to discuss a vehicle inspection. During the call, she reported the vehicle hit some items on the side of the road, the wheels were bent, and the drivers door would not open properly. The customer reported that the vehicle was towed and that repairs are close to being completed. In addition, she reported that although she was not injured, she went to the doctor and hospital for exacerbation of pre-existing conditions. On October [XXX], 2022, Nissan inspected the vehicle at an independent repair facility, which is the location that the customer had the vehicle directly towed to after the incident. From pictures provided by the repair facility, Nissan identified possible damage to the center of the vehicles left front wheel, a broken lower front control arm, a bent tie rod end, and the strut. No other incident-related body damage is visible in the photographs. The photos appear to show that the vehicle experienced a localized impact to the wheel, which generated force into in the location of the lower control arm. During Nissans in-person inspection of the vehicle, the vehicle repairs were near completion. In particular, the left front wheel was not available to Nissan at the time of inspection. Vehicle mileage at the time of inspection was 14,326. No data retrieval or ECU resets were performed by Nissan. As of this report, the vehicle has not been taken to a Nissan dealer. Based on the photos reviewed and Nissans inspection, the localized impact was insufficient to trigger an EDR recordable event. Therefore, Nissan is unable to determine customer inputs to the vehicle at the time of the incident. Separately, no event was recorded within the PPA system, indicating that PPA was not active at the time of the event. November [XXX], 2022: Based on the information provided from the customer, the PPA system was not being used on a limited access road, which is outside of the limitations of the ODD.
10039-3261 v4Level 2BMW of North America, LLC2022-06 13:27Watermill, NY2022 BMW 540iUnknown, see NarrativeHeavy TruckMinorHighway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
1243-4332 v2Level 2Subaru of America, Inc.2022-06 12:24Younger Creek, KY2021 Subaru OutbackADASAnimalNo Injuries Reported70Highway / FreewayRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information
1306-3573 v2Level 2Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing2022-06 07:00Fairfield, TX2021 Toyota Sienna HVADASPassenger CarUnknown77Highway / Freeway
One June [XXX], 2022 Toyota received an allegation related to this crash from the owner of the vehicle through a call to the Toyota Brand Engagement Center. At the time of initial contact and description of the incident,…One June [XXX], 2022 Toyota received an allegation related to this crash from the owner of the vehicle through a call to the Toyota Brand Engagement Center. At the time of initial contact and description of the incident, no allegations related to the operation of Lane Trace Assist, lane centering, or ADAS L2 functions were communicated. On July [XXX], 2022 a field report regarding this crash incident was completed. On August [XXX], as part of a review of a field report created for the incident, Toyota became aware of vehicle data indicating that the vehicle was operating with ADAS L2 engagement in the moments leading up to the crash event. Toyota obtained Vehicle Control History (VCH) and Event Data Recorder (EDR) data from the subject vehicle. VCH provides an approximately 6.75 second pre-crash data recording, and EDR provides an approximately 4.85 second pre-crash data recording. Based on the data obtained, the following information was observed: Dynamic Radar Cruise Control (DRCC) and Lane Trace Assist (LTA) were engaged during the recording until approximately 1.75 seconds prior to the crash event, at which point the Pre-Collision System Alarm activated, disengaging the DRCC and LTA. The vehicle was traveling at approximately 77 MPH prior to the crash event. The owner of the subject vehicle alleged that the passenger vehicle it impacted was "a slow moving vehicle." As a result of the crash incident, multiple airbags deployed in the subject vehicle and it was towed away from the scene. Injuries to occupants of the subject vehicle were described by the owner as: Driver: bruising, Front Passenger: burst fracture in spine, Rear Passenger 1: Bruising, Rear Passenger 2: Bruising. This report is a 10 Day update. The original report ID is 1306-3573-1.
13781-3077 v2Level 2Tesla, Inc.2022-06 13:56Carrboro, NC2015 Tesla Model SADASUnknownUnknown36StreetRedacted by NHTSA as confidential business information

What this table is and is not. Rows are the operators' own filings, not verified cases, and a filing does not establish fault. NHTSA redacts most Level 2 narratives as confidential business information, so the text column is empty for most Tesla rows; the structured columns are not redacted. The table joins NHTSA's current files (incidents from June 2025, after the third amended order) with its 2021-2025 archive, which used an older layout: severity labels, roadway and weather fields differ between the two sets, and the source_set column in the CSV says which one a row came from. Level 2 reports are shown here because the file contains them, but they are not cases in the register, which counts a vehicle as a robot only when nobody inside is responsible for driving. Source: NHTSA SGO 2021-01. The themed reading of the driverless narratives is on the reports page.